Statement of Claim - Singapore Supreme Court Lawsuit

Statement of Claim

Plaintiff

1) I, Frank Lee

• 1a) I’ve been told that I was born on May 26^th 1989 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, with the umbilical cord wrapped around my neck three times, and that I spent the first week of my life in an incubator.

• 1b) Sam Cho @ Dentons Rodyk Singapore helped me execute a deed poll on August 15^th 2024, to change my legal name in Singapore from Frank Christiaan Peelen to Frank Lee.

• 1c) My FIN is REDACTED, but the Ministry of Manpower has refused to recognize what is my legal name in Singapore, and so the name stated on my Employment Pass is Frank Christiaan Peelen.

• 1d) The Netherlands does not allow its citizens to choose their own names (its name change process requires giving the government 5 names from which the government will choose a new name), so I’m in the process of obtaining a St. Kitts and Nevis citizenship by investment, in order to obtain a passport reflecting my chosen name Frank Lee. Once obtained, I will abandon my Dutch citizenship and be able to have my Employment Pass updated. This should all happen before the end of 2026.

• 1e) My address is REDACTED.

• 1f) The following is a link to my autobiography:
  https://franklee1111.blogspot.com/2025/05/frank-lee-autobiography.html

• 1g) My X is https://x.com/FrankLeeSG

• 1h) My phone number is REDACTED

• 1i) My email address is REDACTED

• 1j) Any party that would like a digital copy of this document can request one via email.

• 1k) There is a letter to all parties in this lawsuit attached to this SoC in Appendix M on pages 92-93.

HC/OC 122/2026

2) I first filed a lawsuit against the Institute of Mental Health, as well as Daniel Rouquette, in the Singapore Supreme Court on February 4^th 2026.

3) The decision to discontinue that lawsuit was made during a case conference on March 26^th. The reason for doing so was because it was simpler and quicker to file a new lawsuit than to amend that lawsuit’s Originating Claim + Statement of Claim.

“The Truth About Psychiatry” – My 41-page affidavit that outlines how psychiatry is harming human beings

4) I first filed “The Truth About Psychiatry” to the Singapore Supreme Court on March 16^th in support of a summons for an injunction against the Institute of Mental Health in HC/OC 122/2026.

5) The injunction asked the court to order the Institute of Mental Health to stop confining and “treating” individuals against their wills, unless there is clear and concise evidence that an individual is likely to end its life in the near future, in order to reduce the amount of harm psychiatry is causing Singapore citizens.

6) When the decision was made to discontinue HC/OC 122/2026, “The Truth About Psychiatry” had neither been accepted nor rejected by the court.

7) “The Truth About Psychiatry” is attached to this SoC in Appendix N on pages 94-134.

8) The following is a brief summary of the most important facts that I have outlined in “The Truth About Psychiatry”.

• 8a) Psychiatric drugs are not medicine. They are drugs that alter the chemical compositions of ~500 trillion synaptic clefts in the human brain, and thereby rewire human brains and alter human beings.

• 8b) The existence of a human “mind” and the existence of diseases of such a mind are beliefs, not facts.

• 8c) Psychiatry is neither a science nor a form of medicine or healthcare. It can be looked at as either a system of beliefs and delusions making it a religion, or as an evil and illegal branch of philosophy.

• 8d) Psychiatrists are neither doctors nor scientists. They’re individuals who’ve read books and attended lectures on psychiatry, and received a degree stating that.

• 8e) The facilities society refers to as “Mental Health Hospitals” are not hospitals. They are more accurately referred to as Involuntary Human Alteration Facilities.

• 8f) It is logically impossible to confine an individual to an Involuntary Human Alteration Facility for the deemed protection of others and act in its best interest. It is therefore illegal to lock someone up in an Involuntary Human Alteration Facility for the deemed protection of others.

• 8g) Psychiatry is harmful to human beings, and therefore also to Singapore citizens.

• 8h) Every single day, the brains of hundreds of innocent Singapore citizens are rewired against their wills, without any evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with their brains.

• 8i) Urgent measures need to be taken to protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry.

9) To first-time readers of this SoC: I strongly suggest you read “The Truth About Psychiatry” next, before continuing on to read the rest of this SoC. That way, this SoC will make more sense than if you read it start to finish.

Defendants

10) The Institute of Mental Health (the IMH for short)

• 10a) The IMH is the first and primary defendant in this lawsuit.

• 10b) It is a public institution in Singapore.

• 10c) It is thought of as a “Mental Health Hospital”, but it is not a hospital and more accurately referred to as an Involuntary Human Alteration Facility.

• 10d) It is located at 10 Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 539747 Singapore.

• 10e) Its UEN is 52930996C.

• 10f) Every single day, the IMH rewires the brains of hundreds of Singapore citizens against their wills without any evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with their brains.

• 10g) The IMH hates Phyllis and I, and arguably all human beings.

• 10h) There is a letter to the IMH attached to this SoC in Appendix C on page 78.

11) The Ministry of Health (the MoH for short)

• 11a) The MoH is the second defendant in this lawsuit.

• 11b) It is a department of the Singapore government.

• 11c) It is located at 16 College Road, College of Medicine Building, 169854 Singapore.

• 11d) Its UEN is T08GA0015H.

• 11e) I believe that the MoH is unaware of the fact that the IMH is rewiring the brains of hundreds of Singapore citizens each and every day, without any evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with the brains of those Singapore citizens.

• 11f) The above is not good for the health of Singapore citizens, which the MoH looks after.

• 11g) My primary reason for including the MoH as a defendant in this lawsuit is to make it aware of how the IMH is harming the health of Singapore citizens.

• 11h) There is a letter to the MoH’s employees attached to this SoC in Appendix D on page 79.

12) The Attorney-General’s Chambers (the AGC for short)

• 12a) The AGC is the third defendant in this lawsuit.

• 12b) It is a public institution in Singapore.

• 12c) It is located at 1 Upper Pickering Street, 058288 Singapore.

• 12d) Its UEN is T08GA0001H.

• 12e) I believe that the AGC is unaware of the fact that the IMH is a criminal institution that every single day violates numerous Human Rights Laws, Articles of Singapore’s Constitution, and various other laws in Singapore.

• 12f) The above is against Singapore’s laws, which the AGC states it’s the steward of.

• 12g) My primary reason for including the AGC as a defendant in this lawsuit is to make it aware of how the IMH is in violation of Singapore’s laws and a detriment to Singapore’s public interest.

• 12h) There is a letter to the AGC’s employees attached to this SoC in Appendix E on page 80.

13) Lawrence Shyun Tsai Wong

• 13a) Lawrence is the fourth defendant in this lawsuit.

• 13b) He is a male Singapore citizen.

• 13c) Lawrence is Singapore’s Prime Minister and Minister of Finance.

• 13d) Lawrence works at Prime Minister’s Office, Istana, Orchard Road, 238823 Singapore.

• 13e) I believe that Lawrence is unaware of the fact that psychiatry is causing severe harm to Singapore citizens through primarily the IMH, but also through private psychiatrists.

• 13f) I believe that the above is the #1 most urgent and important issue in Singapore, which I believe should be the primary focus of Singapore’s PM.

• 13g) My primary reason for including Lawrence as a defendant in this lawsuit is to make him aware of how psychiatry is harming Singapore citizens.

• 13h) There is a letter to Lawrence attached to this SoC in Appendix F on pages 81-82.

14) Ye Kung Ong

• 14a) Ye Kung is the fifth defendant in this lawsuit.

• 14b) He is a male Singapore citizen.

• 14c) Ye Kung is Singapore’s Minister of Health.

• 14d) Ye Kung works at 16 College Road, College of Medicine Building, 169854 Singapore.

• 14e) I believe that Ye Kung is unaware of the fact that psychiatry is causing severe harm to the health of Singapore citizens through primarily the IMH, but also through private psychiatrists.

• 14f) I believe that the above is the #1 most urgent and important issue to the health of Singapore citizens, which I believe should be the primary focus of Singapore’s Minister of Health.

• 14g) My primary reason for including Ye Kung as a defendant in this lawsuit is to make him aware of how psychiatry is harming the health of Singapore citizens.

• 14h) There is a letter to Ye Kung attached to this SoC in Appendix G on page 83.

15) Lucien Wong

• 15a) Lucien is the sixth defendant in this lawsuit.

• 15b) He is a male Singapore citizen.

• 15c) Lucien is Singapore’s Attorney-General.

• 15d) Lucien works at 1 Upper Pickering Street, 058288 Singapore.

• 15e) I believe that Lucien is unaware of the fact that there is more criminal activity going on at the IMH than in the rest of Singapore combined.

• 15f) If I were Singapore’s Attorney-General, I would want to be made aware of the above.

• 15g) My primary reason for including Lucien as a defendant in this lawsuit is to make him aware of all the crimes going on at the IMH.

• 15h) There is a letter to Lucien attached to this SoC in Appendix H on pages 84-86.

16) Phyllis REDACTED

• 16a) Phyllis is the seventh defendant in this lawsuit.

• 16b) She is a female Singapore citizen.

• 16c) Her NRIC is REDACTED.

• 16d) Phyllis grew up at REDACTED.

• 16e) Phyllis is super smart, really pretty, and simply the best.

• 16f) Phyllis loves me.

• 16g) There is a letter to Phyllis attached to this SoC in Appendix I on pages 87-88.

17) Charmaine REDACTED

• 17a) Charmaine is the eight defendant in this lawsuit.

• 17b) She is a female Hong Kong citizen.

• 17c) She works as a lawyer at REDACTED.

• 17d) Charmaine and I met on March 9^th 2023 while I was traveling in Hong Kong.

• 17e) We have not met since. We video called twice and we texted sporadically until early December 2024. It was then that Charmaine found out via Instagram that I was being confined to the IMH. I have not had contact with Charmaine since.

• 17f) Charmaine is extremely intelligent and indescribably awesome.

• 17g) Charmaine loves me.

• 17h) There is a letter to Charmaine attached to this SoC in Appendix J on page 89.

18) Laura REDACTED

• 18a) Laura is the ninth defendant in this lawsuit.

• 18b) She is a female Singapore citizen.

• 18c) She works as a recruiter at REDACTED.

• 18d) Laura and I met on November 12^th 2023.

• 18e) We have not met since, and we have not had any contact since November 15^th 2023. Laura checked my Telegram stories from when I started posting them in November 2024 until I stopped posting them in August 2025, and via those found out that I was confined to the IMH.

• 18f) Laura has a heart made of gold. She might be the kindest person I know.

• 18g) Laura loves me.

• 18h) There is a letter to Laura attached to this SoC in Appendix K on page 90.

19) Lynette REDACTED

• 19a) Lynette is the tenth defendant in this lawsuit.

• 19b) She is a female Singapore citizen.

• 19c) Her NRIC is REDACTED.

• 19d) She works as a business development manager at REDACTED.

• 19e) Lynette used to be a yoga instructor at REDACTED until right after my 3^rd release from the IMH in May 2025.

• 19f) I attended her classes from late 2022 until she quit in May 2025.

• 19g) Through her yoga classes, Lynette saved my life in 2024 and 2025. I strongly believe I would’ve killed myself if not for her.

• 19h) Lynette’s vibes are the best vibes, and I miss her yoga classes.

• 19i) Lynette loves me.

• 19j) There is a letter to Lynette attached to this SoC in Appendix L on page 91.

Other individuals

20) Dalilah

• 20a) Dalilah is a female Singapore citizen.

• 20b) To the best of my knowledge, Phyllis considered Dalilah to be her best friend from May 2021 to July 2024.

• 20c) I cannot credibly comment on Phyllis’ relationship with Dalilah thereafter.

21) Geraldine Hiff Goh

• 21a) Geraldine is a female Singapore citizen.

• 21b) I met Geraldine in August 2016.

• 21c) Geraldine and I dated very casually from August 2016 to June 2017. We saw each other weekly for the first month, but less than once a month in the ten months thereafter.

• 21d) After I left Singapore in June 2017, Geraldine and I continued to text every now and then. She got married to an abusive man, she had a child named Tessa, and she separated from her husband. I remember 90% of our conversations consisting of I giving her parenting advice. Geraldine had a super traumatizing childhood, and I was worried for Tessa being raised by a single parent with mountains of trauma, and so I tried my best to help.

• 21e) I removed Geraldine from my life in October 2024 for reasons detailed later in this SoC.

22) Daniel Pierre Noel Henri Rouquette

• 22a) Daniel is a male French citizen.

• 22b) He resides in Singapore at 80A Telok Blangah Street 31 #24-107, 101080 Singapore.

• 22v) His NRIC is S8787780I.

• 22d) I met Daniel in 2016.

• 22e) I considered Daniel to be a friend until November 21^st 2024.

• 22f) Daniel deeply hates me.

23) Jane Ng

• 23a) If I’m not mistaken, Jane is a female Singapore citizen with Malaysian parents.

• 23b) Daniel and Jane are married.

• 23c) The house she and Daniel live in (80A Telok Blangah Street 31 #24-107, 101080 Singapore) is in her name.

• 23d) I considered Jane to be a good friend until she visited me with Daniel in the IMH on Sunday July 21^st 2024.

• 23e) For most of the time I knew Daniel and Jane, I was somewhat closer to Jane than to Daniel.

24) Linda Wan Koh

• 24a) Linda is a female Singapore citizen.

• 24b) She worked as, and perhaps still works as, a counselor.

• 24c) I paid her in exchange for therapy sessions from January 2021 to October 2023, and from May 2024 to November 2024.

• 24d) I barely spoke with Linda during these sessions. 90% of the sessions were non-talk therapy.

• 24e) Linda deeply hates me.

25) Tom Peelen

• 25a) Tom is a male Dutch citizen.

• 25b) I lived in the same house as Tom from my birth in 1989 until I moved out in 2007.

• 25c) The IMH has gone on the record stating Tom is my father and family. Tom is neither my father nor family.

• 25d) To say that Tom was completely absent during my childhood would be closer to the truth than to say he was largely absent.

• 25e) After I moved out, I had little contact with Tom. I occasionally went out to dinners and movies with him until I moved to London in 2011, but thereafter we spoke very infrequently.

• 25f) I helped Tom lose weight by taking him running, and I inspired him to start exercising and taking care of his health.

• 25g) I also inspired Tim to start dating again after he got divorced from his ex-wife Janny.

• 25h) Tom loaned me money in 2016-2018 so I didn’t have to sell my investments.

• 25i) I never had any sort of emotional connection with Tom, because every time I tried to open up to him and share things about myself, he had forgotten about them 2-3 weeks later.

• 25j) I blocked Tom and removed him from my life without warning in February 2021, because I felt strongly that it was the only way I could focus on myself and heal from my childhood traumas.

• 25k) I reached out to Tom again via email in June 2024 explaining to him how his actions during my childhood had negatively impacted me. Tom never responded. As such, the last contact I had with Tom was sometime before February 2021.

• 25l) The last time I met Tom was in November 2019.

• 25m) Tom does not care about me.

26) Janny Timmer

• 26a) Janny is a female Dutch citizen.

• 26b) I had the displeasure of living in the same house as Janny from my birth in 1989 until I moved out in 2007.

• 26c) The IMH has gone on the record stating Janny is my mother and family. Janny is neither my mother nor family.

• 26d) Janny frequently abandoned me during the first five years of my life. I have multiple memories of early childhood abandonments. The worst memory I have is one from when I was 3~5 years old. I remember Janny took me to a large house of her friend in Voorschoten. I had already been traumatized, because I was too scared to go play with the other children, out of a fear that Janny would leave me. I was then ensured that she would not leave and that it was safe for me to go play. After playing for a while with the other children, I asked where Janny was, and I was told she had left. The rest of my memory is blank, but I believe I was made to stay there overnight.

• 26e) I continued to have contact with Janny after I moved out via phone calls and infrequent visits to where she lived. I was her main emotional support after she got divorced from her ex-husband Tom. I encouraged her to fight for an equal share in the divorce proceedings, and at times I spent up to 3 hours on the phone with her.

• 26f) After I lost my virginity in June/July 2017, Janny asked me during a phone call how I had gotten my throat infection. I shared with her that I thought I had gotten it from kissing/oral sex. She then asked me whether it had been with a boy or a girl, in spite of I frequently talking to her about girls. After I told her that it had been with a girl, Janny immediately asked me whether I had paid for it. From one moment to the next, I went from believing I had a mother to realising I had never had one.

• 26g) Even after this, I continued to have occasional phone calls with Janny. She often made unprompted assumptions about my emotions and feelings without me having shared about those with her, which is an invasion of privacy and a form of emotional manipulation. At times I tried to explain this to her, but she never stopped violating my emotional boundaries.

• 26h) I blocked Janny in February 2021 without warning, because I felt terrible every time I got a notification from her, and it felt impossible to heal from my childhood traumas otherwise.

• 26i) I sent Janny the same email I sent Tom in June 2024, explaining how she had harmed and hurt me throughout my life. In this email, I advised her to do therapy and even offered to pay for her therapy. Janny responded ignoring everything I had shared, and told me that no matter how much I hate her, she will also love me, thereby stating that to her:
  - Abandonment
  - Emotional abuse/neglect/manipulation
  - Violation of emotional boundaries (emotional rape)
  - Asking your child whether it paid for sex after it shares with you that it has lost its virginity
  - And many more
  are forms of love. And that:
  - Offering to pay for someone’s therapy in spite of the abovementioned crimes
  - And honesty
  are forms of hatred.

• 26j) Since my 3^rd release from the IMH in May 2025, Janny has continued to send emotionally manipulative emails to an old email account I rarely check. In spite of everything, I have responded to a few of her emails since then, in attempt to get her to understand that she hates me, and is incapable of respecting my boundaries, and such. I’ve told her repeatedly to leave me alone, but she has still not learned to respect my boundaries. I’m intending to delete the email address, but I may still need some of the old emails in it as evidence for this lawsuit.

• 26k) The last time I met Janny was in May 2018.

• 26l) It’s very possible that no one has ever hated any one as much as Janny hates me.

27) Daphne Peelen

• 27a) Daphne is a female Dutch citizen.

• 27b) I lived in the same house as Daphne from her birth in 1991 until I moved out in 2007.

• 27c) The IMH has gone on the record stating Daphne is my sister and family. Daphne is neither my sister nor family.

• 27d) I have not had much contact with Daphne since I moved out. Some years there were a few phone calls, but no more.

• 27e) I blocked Daphne in February 2021 without warning, because although, from my perspective, she also suffered severely at the hands of Janny and Tom, even to the point of being sick for multiple years after I had moved out, she is a mini-version of Janny, and so I had to block her for my own protection.

• 27f) I contacted Daphne again in late May 2024 via Instagram, but within 2-3 messages she started emotionally abusing me. When I pointed this out to her, she said she’d get back to me, but she never did, and so I blocked her some months after. I have not had contact with Daphne since late May 2024.

• 27g) The last time I met Daphne was in the summer of 2019.

28) Wijnand Peelen

• 28a) Wijnand is a male Dutch citizen.

• 28b) I lived in the same house as Wijnand from his birth in 1994 until I moved out in 2007.

• 28c) The IMH has gone on the record stating Wijnand is my brother and family. Wijnand is neither my brother nor family.

• 28d) I had little contact with Wijnand after I moved out. It was so infrequent that I barely remember. I believe we didn’t speak for years at times.

• 28e) I did not block Wijnand in February 2021 like I did Janny, Tom, and Daphne. We continued to text 2-3 times a year.

• 28f) In late 2023, I reached out to Wijnand. After making him promise that he would not share about me with his parents, we started talking a little bit more.

• 28g) In February 2024, Wijnand saw me cry when we were at the Marina Barrage, after I told him about my childhood traumas and about Janny asking me whether I had paid for sex.

• 28h) In the 7 years prior to my first confinement to the IMH on July 19^th 2024, I only met Wijnand twice in November 2019 and in February 2024.

• 28i) I blocked Wijnand on Instagram in mid-August 2024 for a host of reasons, among which were Wijnand having broken his late-2023 promise to me and having shared with his parents about me. And Wijnand having admitted over an Instagram voice call that he had told the IMH that all of my childhood traumas were “weird ideas”, in spite of having seen me cry about them.

• 28j) Wijnand hates me a lot.

Foreword

29) Compensation for the things done to me does not exist, and so I am not seeking compensation through this lawsuit. This lawsuit’s primary goal is to prevent the things that were done to me from being done to others in Singapore.

30) For this reason, this SoC presents the claims/asks before the chronological account of events and list of crimes. This is so that every individual, who reads through this SoC, can keep in mind that, in spite of the severity of the crimes against me, my primary focus is societal change that prevents the future suffering of human beings, not compensation.

31) I also want to ask all parties to:

• 31a) Seek objective truth as much as possible.

• 31b) Collaborate rather than attack and defend where possible.

• 31c) Most importantly, focus on seeking solutions that prevent the things that were done to me from ever being done to anyone in Singapore ever again.

Asks

32) An injunction

• 32a) An injunction against the IMH prohibiting it from ever confining anyone ever again, protecting me from further harm and hurt.

• 32b) Not only does it harm and hurt me when I get confined, I am constantly consciously aware that, at any given point in time, there are hundreds of human beings suffering at the hands of IMH employees in similar ways as I have.

• 32c) As such, the IMH is hurting me 24/7 by harming and hurting others. Empathy, defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of others, is a thing.

33) A declaration outlining the truth

• 33a) A declaration outlining the truth as to what was done to Phyllis and I, and any other person who cares about me and/or is sad that its relationship with me disappeared as a result of the IMH’s actions.

• 33b) For the declaration to be shared with Phyllis at least, so that she can come to know the truth regarding what was done to her.

• 33c) It is important that this declaration is as transparent as it can be. It cannot hold back and phrase things more nicely to protect the feelings of the IMH’s employees. Doing so would come at the expense of the IMH’s victims.

• 33d) The feelings of the IMH’s victims are more important than the feelings of their perpetrators, the IMH’s employees.

2^nd foreword to the IMH (but I hope others are listening as well)

34) What I really want:

• 34a) People working with me to establish the truth as to what was done to me.

• 34b) People working with me to find the root causes that led to these things that were done to me.

• 34c) People working with me to draw conclusions as to what needs to be done in order to prevent the things that were done to me from ever being done to anyone in Singapore ever again.

• 34d) I’ve already done most of the work and outlined how it’s primarily psychiatry’s fault in “The Truth About Psychiatry”, but I believe that there are also individuals that need to be held accountable for their actions.

35) If at any point, the IMH’s lawyers and/or the IMH, but ideally the MoH and the AGC, want to talk to me about the above, please do reach out. We might be able to save Singapore a lot of unnecessary resources that will otherwise be poured into this lawsuit. (In essence, this is an offer to mediate.)

36) Please do hurry, because every single day the brains of hundreds of innocent Singapore citizens are rewired against their wills, without any evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with their brains.

Chronological account of events

May 2021 – May 2024: Phyllis’ and my relationship

37) The beginnings of our relationship

• 37a) Phyllis and I met in May 2021 via a “sugar-dating” app.

• 37b) I made it clear to Phyllis that I was extremely lonely and needed someone to be there for me, while I dated and looked for my long-term life partner on the side. Phyllis understood this and agreed to this.

• 37c) I gave Phyllis SGD3k each month, until October 2023 when the transactional part of our relationship ended. Our relationship continued with no other changes.

38) I learned to “sense”

• 38a) Throughout 2023, Phyllis and I had some mild arguments (from my perspective, we’ve still never fought to this day).

• 38b) During some of these arguments, at times the words coming out of Phyllis’ mouth made no sense, and so, wondering what Phyllis was trying to communicate to me, I started to pay more attention to her non-verbal communication.

• 38c) By early 2024, I could “read the room”, and at times I was able to sense Phyllis’ emotional state without her verbally telling me so. I had become very in-tune with her emotions, or so I believe. One can never know such things for certain.

39) During these three years:

• 39a) The longest we didn’t see each other was 2-3 weeks, with one notable exception when Phyllis traveled to Europe in December 2022.

• 39b) Phyllis slept over at my apartment 2-3 nights per week almost every week.

• 39c) I was able to form the first emotional connection of my life with Phyllis. Phyllis was there for me through a lot. I will not go into further detail, because I do not have Phyllis’ consent.

• 39d) We never introduced each other to each other’s friends.

40) My healing journey

• 40a) I won’t go into my life history before 2021 for the sake of brevity, but it can be found in my autobiography linked to at the beginning of this SoC. I have not scrutinized that autobiography as heavily as I have this SoC, but it is truthful and highly accurate.

• 40b) My primary focus from 2021 to 2024 was working on myself and healing from my childhood traumas. I did so through various methods that included therapy, evening walks, self-reflection, meditation, and spending massive amounts of time digging into my own feelings to understand them better.

• 40c) My average week during this period was, do therapy, go to the gym, spend 4-5 days meditating and digging into unpleasant feelings, and recuperate with Phyllis for 2-3 days.

• 40d) In early 2024 in particular, I did not meet anyone but Phyllis, and outside of spending time with Phyllis, I did nothing but dig into unpleasant feelings in an attempt to understand why I had felt terrible every day for the past decade plus.

• 40e) As I dug through my feelings from January to April 2024, I experienced numerous early childhood flashbacks of having been abandoned, of which the one I shared under point 26d is one example.

• 40f) The second weekend of April, I experienced a brief flashback of my own birth, in which I was taken away from the person that gave birth to me, to what I assume was an incubator.

• 40g) After this, I felt lighter than I ever had before, and I felt that I had healed from my “core trauma”.

41) A long-term relationship

On Friday April 26^th 2024, I showed up with a rose to Phyllis’ workplace (Virgin Active Raffles Places), and I told her that I wanted to do my best to make a long-term relationship work between us. During the following weeks, we started talking about spending our lives together.

May 2024 – July 2024: Phyllis’ suicidality

42) May 17^th

• 42a) On May 17^th, Phyllis confided in me that she had been suicidal for a year and a half, and she told me that I was the first and only person she felt comfortable sharing this with.

• 42b) After I told Phyllis: “even if we don’t talk for weeks, months, years, or even decades, I will ALWAYS be there for you”, Phyllis told me that, knowing herself, she won’t reach out when she needs help.

• 42c) These two separate statements made ~1hr apart took about a week to sink in. When they did, I realized that Phyllis had communicated to me that she might kill herself at any point in time, and that I wouldn’t find out until after she’s dead.

• 42d) Because of this, my sole focus became Phyllis’ emotional well-being. I became hyper focused on attending to her feelings. Nothing else mattered.

43) Dalilah

Late May 2024, I texted Phyllis’ best friend Dalilah on Instagram, whom I had never met or spoken to before, but whom I was 99% sure knew of me. I asked her to keep an eye on Phyllis, and I shared with her that I was worried about Phyllis. I did not share about Phyllis’ suicidality with Dalilah, because I did not want to breach Phyllis’ trust, by sharing this about her without her consent.

44) June 3^rd – June 12^th

• 44a) When Phyllis came over on June 3^rd, that was the first time I saw her since May 17^th, when she had shared with me about her suicidality.

• 44b) Phyllis ended up spending the first and a half week of June at my apartment. In spite of I doing quite okay in the prior weeks and Phyllis being the suicidal one, during this week and a half Phyllis seemed fine and I was incredibly unstable.

• 44c) There’s a sudden multiple hour gap in my memory starting from about 30 minutes after Phyllis came over. The next thing I remember is Phyllis putting her cheek to my cheek and I experiencing something best put into words as “I saw the universe”.

• 44d) In the evening, Phyllis said to me: “Remember me” and “It’s not your fault”. These were frightening things to hear from a self-proclaimed suicidal person, who just so happened to be my only emotional connection.

• 44e) When Phyllis got out of bed in the middle of the night, I couldn’t leave her out of my sight for more than 10 seconds, in the fear that she might jump off of the balcony.

• 44f) The next morning on June 4^th, I saw a sudden text from Charmaine asking me: “have you been kind to yourself lately?”. It made me think that she had somehow sensed something was going on with me from afar. Charmaine had also miraculously texted me within a minute of my date with Laura ending, after I hadn’t heard from her for weeks.

• 44g) I remember it being on the 4^th day that I experienced something best described as telepathy. As I opened the fridge, I could suddenly clearly hear Phyllis’ voice in my head, and judging from Phyllis’ coinciding body language, it seemed as though it was really her talking to me.

• 44h) During these first few days, I could barely eat and I had a bunch of scary nightmares. At one point Phyllis took me to a Pilates class. As we were leaving, the instructor told me “she’s a really good guide”, referring to Phyllis.

• 44i) During the latter half of the first week, I went out to a session with Linda. I’m not certain why, but at times I felt frightened that Linda was able to read my mind.

• 44j) During this week and a half, I alternated between finding Phyllis the most beautiful girl in the world and finding her ugly, sometimes alternating multiple times in the span of minutes. I was open with Phyllis about this, and she was shockingly understanding as if it was completely normal.

• 44k) During this week and a half, I also felt like the universe was pulling me apart and I had to choose between Phyllis and Charmaine, which I was not capable of.

• 44l) After a week and a half of feeling weak, emotional instability, wild sleep-visions (which is how I refer to what others refer to as dreams, I only refer to super nice sleep-visions as “dreams”), and what had been the emotionally scariest days of my life, I started to stabilize.

• 44m) Somehow, I now suddenly felt scared of both Phyllis and Charmaine, the two people I had felt safest with a week and a half prior, and so I cut off Charmaine, and Phyllis and I took a short break from each other.

45) On Friday June 21^st, I sent an email to Janny and Tom explaining to them how they had harmed and hurt me throughout my life, especially during my childhood.

46) I believe it was Sunday June 30^th, when Phyllis and I reconnected via a video call, during which I felt like Linda was present somehow.

47) Over the following weeks, I felt increasingly scared for Phyllis, and I believed she was becoming more and more suicidal.

48) In early July, as I was crying on my couch at home, Geraldine texted me asking: “are you crying?”. She also started talking to me about “a sixth sense” around this time.

49) Sunday July 14^th

• 49a) I had had a Filipino housekeeper, named Vilma, since early 2021. She had been introduced to me by Daniel and Jane.

• 49b) In months prior, I had often felt very uncomfortable when Vilma was over, even to the point of I leaving my apartment to go sit in my condo’s common areas, just so that I didn’t have to be in the same space as Vilma.

• 49c) The week before, Vilma had left open the gutter in my bathroom, something she had never done before in 3+ years, and she had also left various other things in my apartment in a suspiciously unusual state.

• 49d) On Sunday July 14^th, Phyllis and I were still in bed in the late morning. Phyllis was still asleep when I suddenly felt extreme fear. I felt as though I needed to get away from Phyllis to avoid infecting her with a mind-virus.

• 49e) I got dressed, and I left through the backdoor of my apartment.

• 49f) I spent the next 20-30 minutes paralyzed with fear in the hallways of my condo, at some point even laying face down on the floor in front of the elevator. I had received a scam SMS in the prior week, and my best guess was that the scammers had somehow infiltrated my mind. Remembering Lynette’s voice, in the form of a catchphrase she frequently said during classes, gave me comfort at times.

• 49g) At some point, I started feeling that Phyllis was in extreme danger, and so I decided to go to her. I had taken the elevator to a different floor, and so I started walking to the stairs.

• 49h) Right as I was on my way to the stairs, another resident came out of her apartment and walked away, without closing her door behind her. It was as if she had “sensed” that I needed a space to calm down, and so I went into her apartment, and after spending 2-3 minutes calming down, I left and continued onward to the stairs.

• 49i) I have since found out that, even if a person doesn’t close its apartment’s door behind it, indicating it doesn’t care whether someone goes into its apartment, it’s still illegal to go through the open doorway into the person’s apartment. But I did not know that at the time. The woman never said anything to me, nor did she take any action to indicate that she did not want me in her apartment. If anything, she indicated she didn’t care whether strangers entered her apartment, by leaving her door opened.

• 49j) After reaching the stairs, I walked down to the lobby, perhaps because I had not brought my key. I could’ve just gone back to my floor and knocked on the door and asked Phyllis to open. I don’t remember why I didn’t. When I reached the lobby, I was greeted by Phyllis and ~6 police officers. My nervous system was still filled with fear, and I only felt comfortable talking to Phyllis.

• 49k) I was told that the police had been called because I had entered someone’s apartment. But I do not know why six officers responded to this, nor why the woman didn’t give off some sort of indication that she didn’t want me in her apartment, such as closing the door behind her, or talking to me, or screaming, or anything, before calling the police.

• 49l) I told Phyllis about the scammers, which she relayed to the police. The police escorted us back up to my apartment, and then left.

• 49m) Daniel came over later that day and spent the afternoon and evening with me.

• 49n) Months later, in September during a Grab ride with Phyllis to near Vivo, she shared with me that, shortly after I had left the apartment on July 14^th, Vilma had come over. And that, as the police had escorted Phyllis and I back in through the front door of my apartment, Vilma had left through the backdoor. I had completely forgotten Vilma was coming over that day, until Phyllis told me during this Grab ride months later.

• 49o) Believe what you want to believe, but the simplest explanation is that, in my heightened state of sensitivity to take care of suicidal Phyllis, I was able to sense Vilma’s arrival ahead of time, and that her presence in my apartment was the cause of my paralyzing fear. I fired Vilma a few weeks later, immediately after I was released from the IMH.

50) July 17^th

• 50a) On July 17^th 2024, I had a terrible feeling that something was incredibly wrong.

• 50b) I again texted Dalilah on Instagram to ask her to keep an eye on Phyllis without mentioning Phyllis’ suicidality.

• 50c) In the evening, I went to Phyllis’ workplace to check on her, and I asked her to sleep over. She came with me after she finished her shift.

• 50d) After we reached my apartment, I noticed five clear knife cut marks on each of Phyllis’ wrists. When I asked her about them, she refused to talk to me about them, which was a red flag to me, because in 3+ years of knowing Phyllis, I could not remember her having refused to talk to me about something even once.

• 50e) We had sex before sleeping.

The events on Thursday July 18^th 2024

51) On the morning of July 18^th, I woke up to a text from Linda asking me to go for inpatient treatment. I told Linda no, but I added that I was open to discuss it further during our next session the next Monday. I had not shared with Linda about Phyllis’ suicidality, in order to respect Phyllis’ privacy, and so Linda did not have an accurate picture as to what was going on in my life.

52) That morning, Phyllis and I had sex two more times.

53) After lunch, Phyllis got ready to leave for work, but I could tell she became more scared the closer she got to leaving. I connected her leaving my apartment with her fear, and so I convinced her to stay longer, because I was worried for her well-being.

54) I do not remember much from the next three hours. I know Phyllis made some recordings, to which I consented, of me doing some things that some might call strange, like hopping on one feet in my bedroom. I believe these recordings were later shared with the IMH and Daniel, to which I never consented. My belief is that, during these three hours, I was in a half-conscious / half-sleeping meditative state with my sole focus resting on Phyllis’ feelings.

55) Around 5PM, Phyllis got ready to leave again, but I could again tell that she became more frightened the closer she got to leaving. This, in combination with her self-harm marks, as well as Phyllis not acting like her usual self, and other factors that are difficult to communicate to anyone who wasn’t there, made me extremely concerned for Phyllis’ life in that moment.

56) When Phyllis did not respond to my requests to calm down, lie down, or drink water, I eventually chose to physically prevent her from leaving my bedroom. I felt as though her life was in danger, and so I chose to do my best to protect her by keeping her with me (the person she felt safest with) in my bedroom (the place in which she felt safest).

57) During the ten or so minutes during which I prevented Phyllis from leaving my bedroom, she opened the balcony doors, which in 2+ years of us having lived there, neither of us had ever opened. It immediately made me think that Phyllis might try to jump.

58) Voice-recording

• 58a) There is a four minute voice recording of the ten or so minutes during which I physically prevented Phyllis from leaving my bedroom.

• 58b) On this voice recording, you can hear Phyllis’ voice alternating between being annoyed, turned on, excited, frustrated, in-love, as well as angry and stern.

• 58c) You can primarily hear me being concerned for Phyllis.

• 58d) You can also hear Phyllis asking to call the police, for which I gave her my phone.

• 58e) You can also hear Phyllis being pissed that I tried to take her phone, and I immediately stopping and apologizing to her.

• 58f) In spite of choosing to ignore Phyllis’ verbal requests to let her go, I was still paying close attention to the words coming out of her mouth.

• 58g) It is my belief that, via my attempts to give Phyllis my phone and take her phone, I was very subtly trying to communicate to Phyllis that we were mirroring each other’s feelings.

• 58h) It is also my belief that, in a way, I allowed Phyllis to prevent herself from leaving my bedroom, through me.

59) Instead of calling the police, Phyllis chose to video call her friend Dalilah, who saw a bit of what was going on. I did my best to ensure Dalilah that I would never hurt Phyllis, but I was unable to explain to Dalilah in that moment what was going on or the details regarding Phyllis’ suicidality.

60) After about ten minutes, the situation became so emotionally intense that I could no longer stay, and so I decided it was best to leave and hope Phyllis would be able to calm down by herself.

61) When I returned from a walk about twenty minutes later, I noticed a police vehicle in front of my condo. At this point, I immediately looked around for a body fearing Phyllis had jumped. When I didn’t see one, I assumed Phyllis had most likely stabbed herself in my apartment, and that I would be charged with murder. That’s how scared I had been for Phyllis’ life.

62) The police

• 62a) After I walked into my condo, I was brought to a back-room by 6-7 police officers, and by Daniel and Jane. I was told there were more officers upstairs with Phyllis.

• 62b) It turns out (I have the First Information Report about the 999-call) that Dalilah had called 999, and had told the police that I was not letting Phyllis leave and that she thought Phyllis was in danger.

• 62c) The police had decided to send over ~10 officers in response to a 3^rd party saying one person wasn’t letting another leave a house, when the rational response would’ve been to send 2 officers to inquire what was going on, and to see whether the 3^rd party report had been accurate.

• 62d) Furthermore, how and why Daniel and Jane were informed and how they showed up within 30 minutes of a 3^rd party’s 999-call are a mystery to me. Experiences such as this one, that don’t make any sense whatsoever, essentially force me to believe in the supernatural.

• 62e) Everyone told me Phyllis was okay, but everyone looked at me as if I was a criminal, even though no one knew what had transpired. I also felt like no one was honest with me.

• 62f) Furthermore, I did not trust anyone to take care of Phyllis like I was able to. No one in the world cared as much about Phyllis as I did, and Phyllis did not trust anyone in the world as much as she did me, evidenced by the fact that she had confided in me and me alone about her suicidality two months prior.

• 62g) I asked to see Phyllis. I desperately wanted to go to her to confirm that she was still alive, and to be there for her. But I was not allowed to see her. And Phyllis’s self-stated #1 source of comfort at-the-time was kept away from her at a scary and dangerous time.

• 62h) Instead, I was taken to Cantonment, where I gave a statement and was put in jail for a night, during which I was unable to sleep due to my fears that Phyllis was dead.

• 62i) After all, I could not fathom, and still cannot fathom, why I was tossed in jail after doing my best to save the life of the person who loves me the most, based on a single 3^rd party account making it sound like I was a danger to that person. A 3^rd party who had never met me, who had been informed twice that I was worried for Phyllis, and who barely had any information about the situation.

July 19^th 2024 – August 6^th 2024: My 1^st confinement to the IMH

63) The next day on Friday July 19th 2024, I was let out of jail and transported to the IMH by six police officers. I do not know why SPF decided to dedicate six police officers to transporting a single non-violent individual. All six officers spent hours waiting with me in the waiting room at the IMH.

64) First contact with the IMH

• 64a) At the IMH, I spoke with an employee and told it about some of the things that had happened, and I told it about Phyllis’ self-harm marks.

• 64b) I also mistakenly asked the employee to call Linda. I believed Linda would explain things, and I had told her I did not want to go for inpatient treatment.

• 64c) The decision was then made to confine me to the IMH.

• 64d) If the employee, or someone else at the IMH, spoke to Linda before it was decided that I needed to be confined, Linda ignored what I had told her and decided she knew better than I did what was best for me.

• 64e) Before I was brought into the ward, Daniel showed up and started talking about bail, which made me think I’d be allowed to go home.

• 64f) While in a waiting room next to the ward, Daniel told me “we think it’d be good for you to stay here”. Whom he was referring to with “we”, I do not know, but it did not include anyone who cared about me.

65) An hour or so after having been brought into the ward, I decided I wanted to go into the hallway. The door leading to the hallway was half open, and so I tried to push it open so that I could go through.

66) The next thing I remember is waking up strapped to a bed. I pretty much know I was physically assaulted by the nurses, strapped to a bed, and had brain-rewiring drugs injected into me, without my consent and against my will, without any evidence, let alone proof, that there was anything wrong with my brain. No psychiatrist had even spoken with me yet, let alone examined my brain.

67) Friday July 19^th to Monday July 22^nd

• 67a) During these days, I was restrained to beds for large parts of the days, and every single night. Most nights my bed was rolled into the hallway, where I was left by myself completely restrained to a bed around my waist, ankles, and wrists, leaving me unable to move my limbs and my torso.

• 67b) During the night of Saturday July 20^th, before my bed had been rolled into the hallway, another victim, by the name of Paul, got out of his bed, undressed himself, and tried to get into my bed. Fortunately, my legs were still unrestrained at this point, and so I was able to kick Paul away from me.

• 67c) I had not drank alcohol for over 12 years, I had never taken drugs, I have never smoked, and I have never drank coffee. As a result, my brain was highly sensitive, not only to the drugs that were injected into me during these days, but also to the drugs in the meals that I was fed, which clearly had “thin therapeutic fluids” written on the labels.

• 67d) During these days, I was in and out of consciousness, and I experienced extreme visions. The following are but a few of them.

• 67e) I had conversations with Singapore’s Prime Minister, who offered to send a helicopter to pick me up and bring me home, but I denied and asked for a car instead.

• 67f) Phyllis, a goddess, Charmaine, herself, and Laura, a she-devil, fought over who’d have to rape me, because the only way to initiate me in to some sort of “spirit world”, was to rape me. None of them wanted to.

• 67g) Janny and Tom tortured Phyllis, who was screaming, and I had to go save Phyllis, but I was restrained to a bed (that part was very real). Charmaine and Laura explained to me that Janny and Tom had set this up for me.

• 67h) Linda possessed another victim. She told me that I needed to love Janny, and that I needed to call “my parents”.

• 67i) Linda telepathically told me that she was going to kill Phyllis or me, and she gave me a week to decide which one of us would die.

• 67j) Daniel murdered me in a hundred different lifetimes. At some point, I felt/sensed that Daniel was going to visit the IMH, and that he was going to shoot me in the head. After lunch, he and Jane actually showed up. (More details on this meeting that really happened can be found under point 67o.)

• 67k) Every single time the (real) alarms went off in the ward, which was constantly, I could hear “Phyllis is dead. Phyllis is dead. Phyllis is dead.” in my head. But only when the alarms went off.

• 67l) I had a vision in which my brain had been turned into five 2-dimensional sliders, as if the human brain that consists of almost 100 billion neurons, and ~500 trillion connections, can be simplified into five 2-dimensional sliders.

• 67m) Many many many others.

• 67n) During these days, Daniel visited twice. The first time, on Saturday the 20^th, he came alone, seemed to want to help, and he was quite friendly. However, he did not seem to believe me when I told him that I hadn’t done anything wrong, and that I did not have to worry about the police investigation.

• 67o) The next day, he came together with Jane on Sunday the 21^st. This time, neither he nor Jane was willing to listen to anything I had to say. In their minds I was sick and needed to be there. They were unwilling to listen to my side of anything. I was so disgusted with the both of them that I asked to be brought back into the dormitory and vouched to myself to never speak to either of them ever again.

• 67p) However, the next week (I believe Monday the 29^th), Daniel came up during a meeting with the psychiatrists, and they asked me about him. In spite of knowing better deep-down, I thought to myself “what has Daniel ever done to me?” and I couldn’t come up with a good answer, and so I told the psychiatrists that he was still my friend, and Daniel showed up for a 3^rd visit the next day.

68) Tuesday July 23^rd to Monday July 29^th

• 68a) On Tuesday July 23^rd, IMH personnel stopped restraining me to beds and stopped injecting drugs into me, and so I started to sober up.

• 68b) This is when I noticed most of the meals at the IMH have drugs in them, and so I stopped eating the meals with labels and started exclusively eating unlabeled meals, that I hoped would not have drugs in them.

69) Monday July 29^th

• 69a) On Monday July 29^th, I was having an extremely difficult time dealing with everything that had happened, everything that had been done to me, and the situation I was in. Around lunchtime, I allowed myself to cry in front of the entire ward, in order to process some of my emotions.

• 69b) Within a minute, a psychiatrist with the last name Goh came running into the ward wanting to talk to me. She told me I had to start taking oral drugs.

• 69c) I attempted to reason with her. I explained to her that I had acted out of my mind the first four days while I had been drugged, and had then been the best behaved person in the ward during the week prior while I had avoided all drugs.

• 69d) Psychiatrist Goh did not listen to this and walked away.

• 69e) In the evening, a male nurse with glasses came to tell me I had to take drugs.

• 69f) I explained to him that I did not want to take drugs, that I did not consent to being forced to take drugs, and that I considered being forced to take drugs against my will rape.

• 69g) The nurse then threatened to inject drugs into me by force.

• 69h) Faced with this threat, I took the drugs orally while crying.

• 69i) Immediately after, I borrowed a pen and a piece of paper from the nurses. I wrote what was in essence a love letter to Phyllis, explaining to her that I had just been pharmaceutically raped, and I asked her to please take care of me, even if she was no longer able to recognize me. I sent a picture of this letter to Phyllis the following day, when Daniel visited and allowed me to use my phone for 10 minutes.

• 69j) The IMH had given my belongings to Daniel without my consent, which had included Phyllis’ phone. Phyllis had had my phone in her possession when I went for a walk on the 18^th. Daniel had met Phyllis to hand her back her phone and to retrieve my phone.

• 69k) After my release from the IMH, Phyllis’ and my Telegram chat histories had been completely deleted from my phone, and deleted from before Nov’23 or so on Phyllis’ phone. Neither of us knew how, and Phyllis especially was very sad about this.

• 69l) My belief is that Daniel deleted Phyllis’ and my Telegram chat histories, because other than Phyllis, he is the only individual who had access to both of our phones during the period during which they were deleted.

70) The drugs that the IMH forced me to take made me feel horrible. They made it hard for me to think and feel. I felt the worst in the hours after I had been forced to take the drugs, and the least bad in the evenings and mornings before I was forced to take the drugs.

71) In all of my talks with IMH staff, I referred to Phyllis as my best friend / girlfriend, and I also shared a little bit with the IMH’s psychiatrists and my case worker Zoey about my childhood traumas.

72) The IMH connected me to people who hate me and kept Phyllis away from me

• 72a) Someone not I made Daniel my emergency contact and got him to visit me a number of times.

• 72b) Phyllis, who was far and away my strongest and closest connection, did not visit or call me even once during this confinement.

• 72c) Instead, Wijnand and Daphne were informed of my confinement without my consent. I noticed there had been a WhatsApp call from the ward phone to the two of them.

• 72d) It was at this time that Wijnand told the IMH all my childhood traumas were “weird ideas”.

• 72e) The IMH got Wijnand to call me via the ward phone every day. It was at this time that Wijnand informed me that he had violated my boundary and had shared with his parents about me.

73) Towards the end of my confinement, IMH staff started talking to me about I seeing a private psychiatrist. I did not want to see one, but I felt pressured by the IMH’s psychiatrists to see one to the point that I was under the impression that it was a condition for my release, and so I told them that I would see one, because I wanted to get out of the IMH as soon as possible.

74) I was released from the IMH on Tuesday August 6th.

75) Psychiatrist referral letter

• 75a) The IMH gave me a referral letter for the private psychiatrist. This letter included statements from Linda, Daniel, and Wijnand, people who barely knew me, about me, but no statement from Phyllis, the person who knew me better than anyone but I.

• 75b) Wijnand’s statement states I broke contact with Janny, Tom, and Daphne for 2-3 years, as if that’s a bad thing, and as if it’s not completely up to me whether I have contact with others.

• 75c) Wijnand’s statement referred to my childhood traumas as “weird ideas”.

• 75d) Daniel’s statement stated that I had the ability to empathize, as if that’s a bad thing.

• 75e) Daniel’s statement also stated that I heard voices, implying Daniel is a psychic. The only time I had ever described my internal experiences as “hearing voices” was on 1 occasion in the privacy of a therapy session with Linda. Moreover, if you hear your own voice in your head when you think, and if you ever experience earworms, that is already a plurality, and you have voices in your head. There’s nothing wrong with hearing voices, unless the person hearing the voices says there is something wrong with it. Third parties do not have the right to state this is a bad thing.

• 75f) Daniel’s statement also included Daniel’s hateful subjective opinion that my words had been irrelevant for a few weeks.

• 75g) Linda’s statement stated I had been more avoidant since May 2024, in spite of I restarting sessions with her at that exact time, so if anything, I had been less avoidant from her perspective. Not to mention, it is factually irrelevant whether clients are avoidant to their therapists or not. If a client-therapist relationship isn’t one-sided, it means the therapist is violating professional boundaries.

• 75h) Linda’s statement also stated that I had been irrelevant since May 2024, which is subjective. Furthermore, calling me irrelevant equals to stating that I don’t matter, and stating that you hate me.

August 2024 – October 2024: The destruction of Phyllis’ and my relationship

76) When I reached my apartment, there were freshly cut watermelon and freshly baked brownies, along with a post-it note on the wall written by Phyllis, saying she knew I had had no intentions to hurt her/anyone. These indicated Phyllis had stayed at my apartment while I had been confined to the IMH.

77) I had never been suicidal before my first confinement to the IMH, in spite of already having led an extremely challenging life. I felt suicidal for the first time ever in August of 2024, shortly after my release from the IMH. I shared this with Phyllis over a video call after my release.

78) Impact of the drugs post-release

• 78a) A lawyer had been hired for me by Wijnand. (The state had pressed charges against me for wrongful confinement. The investigation later concluded no wrongdoing on my part.)

• 78b) This lawyer threatened me that, if I didn’t listen to the private psychiatrist and continued taking the drugs, I might end up in jail.

• 78c) When I asked the lawyer how anyone could possibly know whether I was actually taking the drugs, the lawyer told me “there are ways”, hinting at something supernatural.

• 78d) I ended up firing this lawyer after he told me that he couldn’t support me in my desire to speak to the IO and the AGC directly, nor in my desire to honestly explain to them what had happened. It appeared as though he was trying to twist the truth, when the truth more than spoke for itself.

• 78e) It wasn’t until Monday September the 2^nd that the private psychiatrist allowed me to stop taking the drugs that were harming me, and told me that I didn’t have to come see him anymore, after weeks of I pleading with him to take me off of the drugs that were harming me.

• 78f) The drugs made me feel horrible, turned me into someone I wasn’t, and impacted my behavior negatively.

79) Jane

• 79a) In early October 2022, I had dinner with Jane at Bread Street Kitchen by Gordon Ramsay at Marina Bay Sands.

• 79b) During this dinner, I decided to share with Jane about Phyllis. She was only the second person in my life I shared with about Phyllis.

• 79c) After I had done so, Jane shared with me that there was a guy in Oxford she knew from university, with whom she was still in touch. She didn’t outright say that she was cheating on Daniel, but it sounded to me like emotional cheating at least, and it also sounded to me like she wanted to have sex with this man in Oxford.

• 79d) Jane further shared that Daniel and she were talking about opening up their marriage and doing sex-therapy.

• 79e) After the dinner, I texted Jane to ask whether I could share what she had told me with Daniel. She told me she did not want me to share with him about the guy in Oxford, which put me in an impossible situation, because how am I supposed to keep something secret from one person in a marriage for the other, when I have a bond with the both of them?

• 79f) The next time I met Daniel, which I remember not being until January 2023, he confirmed some of the things Jane had told me about sex-therapy and their talks about opening up their marriage, and so I decided to not share about the Oxford guy with Daniel in order not to meddle in Daniel’s and Jane’ marriage.

• 79g) This was a mistake, and from my perspective the only time I ever wronged Daniel, because the right thing to do would’ve been to betray Jane, and share with him then and there what she had told me.

• 79h) During this meeting, I also shared with Daniel about Phyllis’ existence.

• 79i) In June 2024, over breakfast at PUNCH on Canal Rd, Daniel told me that Jane was in Oxford. Something inside of me screamed “she’s cheating on you!”, but I wasn’t certain, and I had too much going on at the time to share with Daniel what Jane had told me almost two years prior.

• 79j) Within days after my 1^st release from the IMH, I texted Jane that, if she didn’t do so herself, I was going to tell Daniel the next day about what she had told me in October 2022 about the guy in Oxford. Jane replied: “You have too much on your plate. You need to focus on yourself”.

• 79k) The next day at my apartment, I shared all of this with Daniel.

80) Phyllis’ and my relationship post-release

• 80a) On Wednesday August 16th, Phyllis and I slept together at my apartment again for the first time since my release.

• 80b) From then until Sunday September 29th, Phyllis slept over multiple nights each week.

• 80c) Phyllis stayed over at my place for an entire week straight from August 26^th to September 2^nd.

• 80d) During this period Phyllis and I went on dates.

• 80e) We continued talking about spending our lives together, discussing things such as finances, boundaries, and children.

• 80f) I ordered an additional wardrobe so that there would be more closet space for Phyllis.

• 80g) We celebrated Phyllis’ birthday together.

• 80h) We said “I love you” to each other.

81) Phyllis’ Virgin Active colleagues

• 81a) Towards the end of September, I felt that it was important that I meet some of Phyllis’ friends.

• 81b) At the time I simply trusted my feelings that told me that it was important. But looking back, I believe I was subconsciously aware that the people in Phyllis’ life did not have a good impression of me. They had never met me, so they didn’t know who I really was, and they had undoubtedly heard that I had been confined to the IMH.

• 81c) Phyllis told me that she’d try to get me to meet Dalilah at some point, but she also informed me that her colleagues at Virgin had a really really bad impression of me, and that meeting them was not possible for the time being.

82) My “friends” talked shit about Phyllis, and attempted to convince me Phyllis was after my money

• 82a) Daniel and I went out to Paragon in Orchard a week or so after I had been released on August 6^th. We drank Boost smoothies, and I shared with Daniel that I might be poly-amorous. During this outing, Daniel, completely unprompted, told me that it’d be best if I let Phyllis know that I wasn’t going to give her any money anymore.

• 82b) A girl named Carmen Chong told me something similar. I had briefly dated Carmen for a month before meeting Phyllis, and I had stayed in contact with her as friends, and met her 1-2 times a year. She was the first person I told about Phyllis’ existence. At the end of September, Carmen, over text, started trash talking Phyllis, trying to convince me Phyllis was after my money. I cut Carmen out of my life not long after.

• 82c) Geraldine was the worst offender. Both over text and over a few phone calls, Geraldine kept bringing up “sugar baby” friends of hers, and kept telling me how all they’re all interested in is money, all-but outright telling me that Phyllis was manipulating me for money. I repeatedly told Geraldine to stop. After Phyllis showed me texts from Geraldine to her in which Geraldine said: “I’m just trying to get him to see what he wants”, I completely removed Geraldine from my life in October.

83) Unauthorized money transfers

• 83a) My bank at the time was Wise, an online bank. I switched to DBS in late 2024 because of the following events.

• 83b) Both on July 18^th and September 29^th, SGD10k was transferred from my bank account to Phyllis’, without me initiating them.

• 83c) For the longest time I assumed I had somehow made the first transfer during the three hours I had been half-conscious on July 18^th, but I now all-but-know that that transfer was made by neither Phyllis nor me.

• 83d) As for the second transfer, at the time it was made, Phyllis and I had just gotten home from Pilates and were taking a shower and having sex. So neither of us could’ve made the transfer.

• 83e) When I emailed Wise and asked them to tell me the devices that had been used to make the transfers, and the locations from which the transfers had been made, Wise did not provide the information I requested, and all it said was “we’re tracking your case”.

• 83f) When Daniel heard about the September 29^th transfer, he pushed me to file a police report against Phyllis. He told me that, even though there was no proof that she had had anything to do with it, there was more than enough for the police to go after her. I refused.

• 83g) Whoever caused money to go from my account to Phyllis’ account was trying to make it look like Phyllis was stealing from me. Daniel and Geraldine, in particular, who had tried hard to convince me that Phyllis was a thief, are seemingly likely suspects, but I have no proof, and they should not have had access to my bank account.

84) Phyllis’ and my separation

• 84a) From Friday September 27^th to Sunday September 29^th, Phyllis and I had a normal weekend together, during which we went to Pilates, had sex, and did various other activities.

• 84b) Between Monday September 30th and Wednesday October 2^nd, the relationship Phyllis and I had spent 3+ years building suddenly fell apart over text.

• 84c) What started it was Phyllis needing me to be there for her, but I needing a few days alone to work on myself and my own issues, as a result of everything that the IMH had done to me. The inexplicable money transfer from the 29^th further complicated things between us.

• 84d) Phyllis and I still, to do this day, have not talked about any of the things that were done to us and happened between us, nor why we stopped seeing each other. To me, it seems rather obvious that we were stopped from seeing each other.

• 84e) The text, which outsiders would say was our “break-up” text, was one from Phyllis at 11:30AM on Wednesday October 2^nd.

• 84f) I was at Pure Fitness Asia Square at the time. When I ordered food on my way home 30 minutes later, my credit card had suddenly been blocked. I do not know why.

• 84g) After I reached my apartment, I saw 9 missed calls from FortyTwo, the furniture company that was set to deliver the wardrobe that day. When I called FortyTwo back, an employee said “we assume you don’t want the wardrobe anymore”, as if it knew about the texts between Phyllis and I from an hour earlier.

• 84h) I replied: “No, what makes you think that?”. The FortyTwo employee then said: “Oh, sorry, communication error” and hang up.

• 84i) The wardrobe was delivered later that day.

85) IO Andi from SPF admitted to having told Phyllis and I that it was illegal for us to contact each other

• 85a) On Monday October 7^th, I not only felt suicidal, I was incredibly suicidal. I was seriously thinking of killing myself, and I was incredibly frightened of myself.

• 85b) I think I may have sent Charmaine a text first, but I then reached out to Phyllis, my #1 support.

• 85c) I vented to her about a few things that she had done to me in the past, such as her cheating on me, and I called her a cheater, among other things, and I made it very clear to Phyllis that I was extremely suicidal.

• 85d) I had never sent Phyllis (or anyone) a text like that, and I regretted them, and deleted them, ~30 minutes later, before Phyllis had seen them (no Telegram read receipt).

• 85e) A few days later on Thursday October 10^th, I got a call from a police officer, IO Andi, asking me to come to Cantonment to give a statement. It turned out that, on Monday evening, Phyllis had filed for harassment against me from Raffles Place. I strongly suspect that her Virgin Active colleagues pushed her do so.

• 85f) I gave a 3+ hour statement to IO Andi. At the end, he informed me that it was now illegal for me to contact Phyllis in any way, shape, or form. He threatened me with another confinement at the IMH and jail time, if I contacted Phyllis again.

• 85g) After Daniel told me over lunch (at Marché @ Vivo) that he suspected the police had also told Phyllis that it was illegal for her to contact me, I decided to follow-up with IO Andi via a phone call.

• 85h) I believe it was Thursday October 24^th when I called IO Andi. This call turned into the weirdest phone call of my life.

• 85i) First, I asked IO Andi whether he had spoken to Phyllis yet, which he denied.

• 85j) Then he changed his stance, and he told me that he had spoken to Phyllis.

• 85k) When I asked him how he had spoken to Phyllis, he refused to answer, and he said that he was under no obligation to tell me.

• 85l) I then asked IO Andi whether he had also told Phyllis that it was illegal for her to contact me. IO Andi replied that he had.

• 85m) When I pointed out to him how wrong this was, he switched his stance again, and he denied ever having told either of us that it was illegal for us to contact each other.

• 85n) IO Andi finished the call by stating that, if I promised to him that I wouldn’t talk to Phyllis again until the other IO, Rohana, had finished her investigation against me, he’d drop his investigation. Which equated to IO Andi admitting that he did not have a case against me. This was blackmail. All he wanted was for Phyllis and I not to contact each other.

86) The LPA

• 86a) In September, I had started work on an LPA with Sam Cho @ Dentons Rodyk.

• 86b) My form 2 LPA included a clause that my donees do everything in their powers to keep me out of the IMH.

• 86c) In late October, Daniel signed this LPA on the portal.

• 86d) Sam and I went to get the certificate issued at Crawfurd Medical in Suntec, on Friday November 8th.

• 86e) However, when the GP saw the referral letter from the IMH, she refused to issue the certificate.

87) I dropped Linda

• 87a) On Tuesday November 19^th, I did my last therapy session with Linda.

• 87b) I think there had been a struggle within me about seeing Linda for some time.

• 87c) On one hand, I could not point to anything she had done wrong, and at face value she seemed to be someone I could trust, and someone who had supported me in my emotional healing journey for years. On the other hand, something within me told me that I really needed to stay away from her.

• 87d) On November 19^th, the latter won out over the former, and I informed Linda I would no longer be seeing her.

• 87e) Looking back, there had been countless red flags that I had overlooked:
  - Linda had clearly had a strong emotional connection to me as far back as October 2023, when I first stopped seeing her. She seemed almost in tears when I told her I was going to stop seeing her.
  - When I restarted sessions with her in May 2024, I felt like I had violated my own boundaries during therapy with her for years. But how does one violate one’s own boundaries? I now understand that it’s Linda who violated my boundaries for years.
  - The visions in which Linda told me she was going to murder Phyllis or I. Where ever this vision originated from, it did not originate from me. Exaggerated or not, I believe it was based on some sort of truth.
  - It’s all-but-certain that Linda spoke to the IMH before the decision was made to confined me, and that Linda contributed to I being confined after I had told her I did not want to go for inpatient treatment.
  - The absurd things Linda told the IMH about me, as stated in the psychiatrist referral letter.
  - After my 1^st release from the IMH, at times it felt like I was made to comfort Linda during sessions, and at times it felt as though I was made to look at her boobs, which was disgusting. Linda looked like she was in her late-50s.
  - In early 2026, when I wrote down for myself everything that I had been through, I referred to Linda as THE rapist, because I felt that in a universe filled with all the rapists in existence, Linda would out-rape all the other rapists combined. I had no evidence to support this, other than that I felt in my soul that it was true.
  - And many many other things.

• 87f) Daniel voiced concerns when I told him I had dropped Linda, even though he could not have possibly had any idea whether it had been the right or wrong decision for me.

The events on Thursday November 21^st 2024

88) The morning of November 21^st

• 88a) On the morning of Thursday November 21st, I went to Phyllis’ home and rang her doorbell to talk to her. I had not seen her since September 29^th, and I had not had contact with her since October 2^nd.

• 88b) Phyllis came out as she was about to go to Mercylight Animal Shelter to volunteer.

• 88c) We ended up sitting near each other at the HDB’s pick-up spot for 20-25 minutes, during which we did not say more than a few words to each other.

• 88d) Then, out of nowhere, two police officers showed up for unknown reasons, and they separated us for unknown reasons.

• 88e) If Phyllis had wanted to get away from me, she could’ve simply told me so, or she could’ve ordered a Grab and went to go volunteer.

• 88f) Things like this make it seem to me as though there’s a global conspiracy going on to keep Phyllis and I separated, because 3^rd parties continue to separate us in ways that make zero sense.

• 88g) I cannot believe that Phyllis wanted the police to separate us and contacted them, because three weeks later she had moved her clothes back into my apartment and had started sleeping there.

• 88h) After a ~15 minute chat with one of the police officers, Phyllis had disappeared.

89) In the afternoon, I received a text from Daniel asking me to meet him at my place, as well as one from Phyllis saying she’d come too. When I reached back to my condo in the late afternoon, the two of them were already there, and the three of us went up to my apartment.

90) Daniel betrayed me in the most despicable way

• 90a) After going up to my apartment, Daniel immediately started berating me for the state of my apartment, and a few chips in the paint, even though he was neither an owner, nor a tenant, of the apartment.

• 90b) Daniel then started telling me that I needed to go for a health check-up. I told Daniel no, because there was nothing wrong with me.

• 90c) Daniel ignored this, and he started to pressure me. Throughout the next 1-2 hours, Daniel did not stop pressuring me to go for a health check-up. I continued to say no, but Daniel didn’t listen, and he continued to periodically bring it up.

• 90d) Daniel lied to me saying we’d go to NUH or a private facility, because he knew that, if he told me that he intended to bring me to the IMH, I would’ve immediately caught on to his intent to betray me, and immediately lost all trust in him.

• 90e) Daniel also used emotional manipulation against me. He interwove asking me to go for a health check-up with casual small-talk and jokes, soothing me and making me feel safe, even though I was the opposite of safe due to Daniel’s intentions to betray me.

• 90f) Two paramedics were called and let into my apartment without my permission. I remember Phyllis is the one who opened the door to let them in, but it was clearly part of Daniel’s plan.

• 90g) Although I spoke to Phyllis here and there, she barely spoke back. Daniel and I did most of the talking.

• 90h) After 1-2 hours, I could no longer resist, and I succumbed to Daniel’s pressure and manipulation. I was emotionally exhausted from resisting Daniel, and from telling him “no” over and over. I was left with no choice but to relent to Daniel’s pressure, and to allow myself to be taken, for what I had been told was a health check-up, but not before I was promised I would be allowed to sleep in my own apartment that night.

• 90i) I was then strapped into a stretcher, loaded in an ambulance, and brought to the IMH, in spite of I having made it very clear that I did not want to go for a health check-up, and in spite of I having stated that I wanted to sleep in my own apartment.

• 90j) After a brief chat with an employee at the IMH, during which I was accompanied by both Phyllis and Daniel, I was confined to the IMH for unknown reasons, in spite of my stated intent and desire to sleep in my own bed that night, and in spite of I having been promised that I would be allowed to.

November 21^st 2024 – December 11^th 2024: My 2^nd confinement to the IMH

91) Friday the 22^nd, Saturday the 23^rd, and Sunday the 24^th, I repeatedly asked the nurses why I was at the IMH and why I was being kept against my will. The nurses did not respond to my question even once, and instead answered it with silence and ignored it.

92) Privacy

• 92a) I also asked for privacy a number of times, pleading with the staff that it’s a basic human right, but it was denied to me.

• 92b) I was allowed to sit in a side-room a few times, but I was never allowed to close the door.

• 92c) The nurses even came to bother me in the toilet, when I stayed in there for more than 1-2 minutes.

93) I called Phyllis daily via the ward phone during the first three days. I pleaded with her to get me out of the IMH quickly, because she would no longer be able to recognize me otherwise.

94) Monday 25^th meeting with the psychiatrists

• 94a) On the morning of Monday the 25^th, I had a meeting with the psychiatrists.

• 94b) The psychiatrists did not listen to me at all. I wanted to know why I was at the IMH, and why I was being kept against my will, but other than “there exist concerns about your mental health”, the psychiatrists refused to explain anything to me.

• 94c) After about ten minutes, having refused to provide me with any answers, the psychiatrists walked out of the room in what was my shortest psychiatrist meeting in all of my three confinements to the IMH.

• 94d) Deep down, I was livid that the psychiatrists had refused to even explain to me why they were keeping me against my will. However, on the surface, I was at most mildly upset, because I knew that, if I showed anyone my emotions, I would be punished for them.

95) Afterwards, I tried to call Phyllis again via the ward phone, but I got a “this customer cannot be reached” message.

96) My November 25^th Rape

• 96a) After lunchtime on the 25^th, all other victims were brought back to the dormitory, while I remained in the cafetaria.

• 96b) I was then told by the staff that I needed to take drugs, which I knew were bad for me, so I refused.

• 96c) Next, twenty nurses came into the ward.

• 96d) An employee, whom I later found out was my case worker, then said she wanted to talk to me.

• 96e) Her energy reminded me of Janny’s, which is the most painful and disgusting thing in the world to me.

• 96f) The only way I was able to have a conversation with the case worker was with a nurse, named Jia, nearby, whose energy reminded me of Lynette’s.

• 96g) After a brief conversation with the case worker, the twenty nurses, who had hung back at the far side of the cafetaria, started approaching me.

• 96h) I was completely non-violent.

• 96i) I walked away from the nurses, but they quickly cornered me.

• 96j) The nurses then physically assaulted me, and they used their physical strength to overpower me.

• 96k) I was then restrained to a bed.

• 96l) The Penguin stuffed animal I had brought with me, which had been a birthday present to me from Phyllis, was then ripped out of my arms, tearing it in numerous places.

• 96m) Psychiatric drugs were then raped into me via a syringe that was used to penetrate numerous places on my body.

• 96n) As things escalated, I raised my voice and started shouting things like: “Do you even know my name?”, “Stop!”, and “Are you aware of what you’re doing?”.

• 96o) In the end, all I could shout was: “Phyllis, please save me!”.

• 96p) Never at any point was I violent in any way, nor did I do anything to deserve this treatment.

• 96q) I was left restrained to the bed for the entire afternoon until dinnertime.

97) My November 26^th Rape

• 97a) The next day, the IMH’s staff did the exact same thing to me.

• 97b) In spite of I being completely non-violent, a large number of nurses came at me, restrained me to a bed, and raped psychiatric drugs into me, thereby rewiring my brain and mutilating me.

• 97c) This time I shouted a few additional things like: “Please shoot me in the head instead.”, and “Fuck you, Daniel!”.

• 97d) This time, the staff kept me restrained for about 18 hours overnight, until morning.

• 97e) During these 18 hours, I did not lose consciousness once, nor did I experience even a single vision.

• 97f) This was in stark contrast to when I had been restrained during the early days of my 1^st confinement, when the visions and unconscious periods had made things less unbearable. These 18 hours completely restrained to a bed, during which I was fully conscious without any visions, were FAR worse, and much more difficult to get through.

98) On Wednesday November 27th, the psychiatrist in charge of me, who carried the name Jiaqian Sun, talked to me. She explained to me that the IMH would continue doing the same thing to me, until I relented and took the drugs orally. Not having any strength left in me, I broke down crying saying “why me” (I’m not 100% certain I said this out loud), and I relented. I took psychiatric drugs orally that evening.

99) From Thursday the 28^th onward, I was able to reach Phyllis again via the ward phone, no longer getting a “this customer cannot be reached” message, and the nurses started giving me my cellphone during the day, from 10AM to 7PM, which had been withheld from me until then.

100) The IMH’s patient infringement

• 100a) Every single night before I go to sleep, I put my phone in airplane mode, and I turn down the brightness to lowest.

• 100b) I did the same before handing my phone in to the IMH’s staff every day at 7PM.

• 100c) I think it was on the 29^th, the very first morning I received my phone back after having handed it in, that I noticed my phone’s brightness was higher, and that it was no longer in airplane mode, indicating someone had tampered with it.

• 100d) I immediately confronted a nurse, who reacted defensively and said they’d never do that, because that’d be patient infringement.

• 100e) This means that the IMH has stated it’s guilty of patient infringement.

101) Phyllis came to visit me twice during this confinement, on Sunday December 1^st and on Sunday December 8^th. Phyllis gave me a hug during her first visit, and she really cheered me up and brought me a lot of good vibes during her second.

102) During the second and third week of my confinement, I kept requesting to talk to a case worker. But no case worker ever came to talk to me.

103) I asked for Phyllis to be my “next-of-kin” / emergency contact. I was told Phyllis denied this.

104) On Wednesday December 11th, the IMH released me.

105) The IMH had again handed my keys and my wallet to Daniel, without my consent, whom I had told the psychiatrists that I never wanted to see again.

106) Right before I was released, psychiatrist Sun asked me for my consent to share information about me with Wijnand, who, apparently, had been informed of my confinement and status against my will yet again, just like in July. I explicitly forbid her from sharing about me with Wijnand.

December 2024 – April 2025

107) December 11^th

• 107a) After my release on the 11th, Phyllis met me with the plan to book a hotel room for me at Marina Bay Sands that I could stay in until my keys could be retrieved, because I was too frightened of Daniel to go collect them myself.

• 107b) But Phyllis had once again stayed at my apartment during my confinement, just like in July/August, and she told me that she thought the batteries of the backdoor had run out.

• 107c) Therefore, we decided to go back to my apartment together. We were able to enter through the backdoor without any keys.

• 107d) After reaching my apartment, it turned out Phyllis had moved all her clothes back in, and that she had bought a cute figurine for the bedroom with the words “love” and “sad” on it. This, and she having told me so over text during the confinement, told me that Phyllis had again stayed at my apartment during my confinement.

• 107e) However, Phyllis’ mood had flipped at MBS when she had found out I had no intention to take the psychiatric drugs that the IMH had prescribed to me, and she left immediately after we reached my apartment.

108) My Police reports against Daniel

• 108a) On December 13^th, I filed a police report against Daniel at Marina Bay Police Center, describing what he had done to me on November 21st.

• 108b) However, the words in that report are those of the police officer who recorded my statement, not my own.

• 108c) Furthermore, I had just been tortured, and I had just had my brain rewired, so I was unable to recollect certain important details, such as the fact that Daniel had legally promised to do everything in his power to keep me out of the IMH.

• 108d) On April 16^th 2025, I filed a 2^nd police report against Daniel for his acts on November 21^st, which was also included Linda, Jane, and IO Andi as suspects.

• 108e) I never heard anything back about either of these reports.

109) Post 2^nd confinement

• 109a) During the weeks and months following my 2^nd confinement, I felt even more suicidal than I had had after my 1^st confinement.

• 109b) There were moments during which I was so scared for my own life that I signed up for a membership at Virgin Active, because I thought that if I could train at the gym Phyllis worked at, I’d be less likely to kill myself.

• 109c) In the wake of my 2^nd confinement, I suddenly had Dutch voices in my head, in spite of not having spoken any Dutch for years, and in spite of English having been my primary language since I had moved out 17 years earlier in 2007.

• 109d) These “voices” were not my own. It was as if the IMH had raped them into me.

110) The official start of my legal proceedings against the IMH

• 110a) After the IMH had raped me on Nov 25^th and 26^th, I decided to pursue legal action, and I started contacting lawyers using my cell phone while I was still confined.

• 110b) My plan was to do a class-action lawsuit, with the goal to prevent the things that had been done to me from being done to others.

• 110c) I also planned not to ask for any monetary compensation for myself, but to try and get SGD100k for every other victim.

• 110d) On December 26^th 2024, I engaged Terence Tan, a lawyer at Drew and Napier, to start legal proceedings against the IMH.

• 110e) He told me that class-action lawsuits don’t exist / are difficult in Singapore.

• 110f) In a letter to the IMH on February 20^th 2025, Terence told the IMH to make sure that all evidence pertaining to my confinements is preserved, including CCTV/camera footage of I being restrained, and I being injected with drugs.

• 110g) Terence also requested a medical report from the IMH via a letter. On March 16^th, Terence and I received a report on me from the IMH.

111) Monday February 10^th 2025

• 111a) On Monday February 10^th around 6PM, Phyllis showed up unannounced at my apartment.

• 111b) Other than a few very brief interactions at Virgin, during which I had told Phyllis about the will I was setting up, this was the first time I had seen her since December 11^th. Phyllis had not responded to any of my texts since then.

• 111c) She took back her clothes, and the two of us talked for an hour, almost entirely about me. Phyllis did not seem comfortable sharing about herself or her life with me. I talked to her about topics such as, I having started to apply for a St. Kitts and Nevis citizenship by investment, and how much Linda had hurt me.

• 111d) I also brought up the will again, and I asked Phyllis to share her NRIC with me, so that it could be included in the will, which she did.

• 11e) On February 12^th, Terence and I finalized the will, through which I bequeathed 55% of my SGD 40M net worth to Phyllis, 25.5% to Charmaine, 15.5% to Laura, 3% to Lynette, and 1% to Singapore Children’s Society.

• 111f) On April 15^th, I changed my will to bequeath 100% of my everything to Phyllis.

• 111g) On March 31^st 2026, I changed my will again. This time I bequeathed 55% of my assets to Phyllis, 15% to Charmaine, 15% to Laura, and 15% to Lynette.

112) Thursday March 13^th 2025

• 112a) Phyllis showed up unannounced at my apartment again on Thursday March 13^th 2025.

• 112b) We again talked for about an hour.

• 112c) This time, Phyllis did share a few things about her life with me, the most important of which was that her mother had cut off financial support and had kicked her out of the house, when her mother had found out about my existence.

• 112d) When Phyllis asked, I gave her SGD15k so that she could finish university without touching her investments.

• 112e) When she left, Phyllis told me she’d come check up on me in the following weeks.

• 112f) On April 11^th, I filed a police report against Phyllis’ mother, on behalf of Phyllis, for her financial and “residential” manipulation of Phyllis.

The events on Thursday April 17^th 2025

113) On Thursday April 17th, I ran into Phyllis at Raffles Place while I was on my way to Virgin Active. Phyllis appeared to be on her way to the MRT station, but when she saw me, she turned around and walked to Virgin Active with me.

114) After a short while at Virgin, Phyllis, accompanied by some of her colleagues, went to the elevator to go down. I decided to go down with them, because I wanted to talk to Phyllis. After we all went down, Phyllis and her colleagues stood by the side of the building.

115) I tried to talk to Phyllis, but Phyllis’ colleagues blocked the way without Phyllis saying a word. So, I decided to talk to Phyllis from a distance, while her colleagues were in between preventing us from properly communicating. Neither Phyllis, nor her colleagues, said so much as a single word to me.

116) After a short while, Phyllis and her colleagues moved over to the other side of the building, where Raffles Place MRT is. I continued to talk out loud to Phyllis from a small distance, while her colleagues were in between us, telling her some things about my life. At no point did Phyllis, or her colleagues, tell me not to talk to her / them. After a short while, I sat down and I started crying, while I continued to talk out loud, at this point more so to myself than to anyone else.

117) After a short time passed, two individuals in police uniforms showed up for unknown reasons, who immediately, and without warning, got into my personal space and touched me. I moved away from them. Soon, two more individuals in police uniforms showed up, while I continued to cry and talk out loud. At no point did any of these individuals in police uniforms say anything to me, attempt to communicate with me verbally (or in any other way that I am aware of), or ask me to stop crying or go home.

118) After a few minutes passed, the four individuals in police uniforms, aided by two bystanders, physically assaulted me in front of Phyllis, and in front of hundreds of Singaporeans. These six individuals forcibly pinned me to the ground and put handcuffs on me. A video of this assault was later uploaded to Singapore social media, with fake subtitles and tampered audio, and it was seen by approximately half a million Singaporeans.

119) In this video, you can hear me shouting “Phyllis” and “Phyllis help me” at various points, proving that the subtitles are fake. Furthermore, the Facebook post is titled: “Not sure why he was pinned, he was sitting and crying Help”, and both SureBoh and Mothership question the accuracy of the subtitles.

120) I was then loaded in a police car by two of the individuals wearing police uniforms, one of which carried the name Lee Rafael, and I was brought straight to the IMH. I was neither brought to a station, nor was I asked to give a statement, which is illegal, because the MHCTA requires police officers (if that’s what they were) to bring along the facts of the case when transporting a person to the IMH against its will.

121) At the IMH, I talked to an employee. I correctly told it that what was being done to me was illegal, using the words “this is beyond illegal”. The employee then had me confined.

April 17^th 2025 – May 5^th 2025: My 3^rd confinement to the IMH

122) During the following three weeks, I was completely cut off from the outside world by IMH personnel. I was neither allowed a phone, nor was I allowed to make phone calls, nor was I allowed to have any visitors.

123) Rape is legal

• 123a) On the first day of this confinement, a nurse came to talk to me, and he told me that he wanted to mutilate me via an injection of brain-rewiring drugs.

• 123b) I’m translating here. Those weren’t his exact words, but that’s what he was telling me. He wasn’t aware of the meaning of his words. This was the same male nurse, with glasses, who had forced me to take drugs on July 29^th 2024.

• 123c) I, again, told this nurse that I did not consent to this, and I asked him whether rape was legal. I cannot recall his exact response, but I think he nodded and/or said yes.

• 123d) It was clear that my consent was not required for what was about to be done to me, and so I was mutilated by the nurse.

• 123e) Afterwards, I pointed at the CCTV camera and I yelled: “See you in court!”.

124) During the first two days of this confinement, I had concerns for Phyllis’ well-being and life, because I knew her to be suicidal, and she had just seen a person she cared about physically assaulted and abducted right in front of her. I asked the nurses, multiple times, to call the police, and to ask the police to do a wellness check on Phyllis. But I was ignored.

125) In spite of not being allowed to use a phone, I managed to call Terence with a cellphone that another victim lent to me. Terence later told me that, although he had tried to get information from IMH employees, he had been completely stonewalled.

126) Call from Geraldine via the ward phone

• 126a) On Wednesday April 23^rd, a nurse handed me the ward phone saying I had a call from “the pharmacist”.

• 126b) This made me think I’d be released that day, because during prior confinements I had only talked to a pharmacist on the days I had been released, albeit in person, and not via a phone.

• 126c) When I answered the phone, the voice on the other end of the line was Geraldine’s.

• 126d) The conversation was short, and I do not remember what it was about, but I’m pretty confident it wasn’t about drugs.

• 126e) I do not know what the purpose of this phone call was. It’s the only phone call I received during this three weeks long confinement.

127) FAR AND AWAY, the nine worst hours of my life

• 127a) On the night of April 26th, the ward went to sleep around 10PM as usual.

• 127b) Around 11PM, a group of guards (not nurses) walked into the ward.

• 127c) The guards then proceeded to get me out of bed, restrained me to a different bed, and I was raped and mutilated.

• 127d) The nurses then rolled the bed I had been restrained to into the hallway, where I was left by myself for, FAR AND AWAY, the nine worst hours of my life.

• 127e) These nine hours were so bad that, they have made everything else the IMH has done to me seem like mundane afternoons in comparison.

• 127f) The first thing I experienced after having been left alone in the hallway was that, I once again felt like the worst thing to have ever existed.
  I had felt this way before, but during one of Lynette’s yoga classes in February, I had realized that the things that had been done to me had nothing to do with who I was. After the class, I texted Lynette about this break-through I had made within myself, via Instagram.
  Shortly after having been drugged, having been rolled into the hallway, and having been left all by myself completely restrained to a bed, from one moment to the next, I again felt that I was the worst thing to have ever existed, but much worse this time than before. This time, I felt it in my soul. I KNEW that it was true, because it was the only explanation for what I was about to experience.

• 127g) These nine hours are impossible to describe to individuals who haven’t experienced them. The best way to sum them up is to say that, what I experienced during these nine hours should not be possible, and needs to not be possible, but because I experienced it, it was possible, and therefore it, most likely, still is possible.

• 127h) I know, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that, that night, I suffered more deeply than any human being ever has.

• 127i) This is coming from a person who, all the way back in 2014, had a panic attack, and nine months later felt so terrible that, he realised that he now felt worse than he had thought possible a year prior, which helped him understand that it’s really dumb to assume to know how others feel.

• 127j) In spite of this, I am telling you that, no one has ever suffered as deeply as I did that night.

• 127k) My best guess is that, just like in real hospitals, surgeries are performed in “mental health hospitals”, but that these “surgeries” aren’t physical surgeries, but rather, non-physical paranormal surgeries.

• 127l) Some evidence to support this is that, I would MUCH rather be fully conscious during an open heart surgery than re-experience this night, because at least during an open heart surgery I’ll know what’s going on, I’ll know that the surgery is saving my life, and I’ll presumably have consented to the surgery.

• 127m) I could describe this night to you as some sort of reverse “soul-surgery” that I did not consent to, which, instead of making me better, shattered my soul and completely destroyed me.

• 127n) This is about the only explanation I can come up with. At face value, spending a night restrained to a bed in a hallway should suck and be annoying, not result in I describing it to you as I have just done in the above dozen paragraphs.

128) Police involvement in my confinement

• 128a) On Monday April 29^th, I had my 2nd meeting with psychiatrist Lee, the psychiatrist in charge of me during my 3^rd confinement.

• 128b) He informed me that he was still waiting on confirmation from the police before he could release me. I do not know why the police had any sort of say in when I’d be released.

• 128c) On May 6^th, Terence wrote to the AGC to ask for clarification, but Terence and I never received a response.

129) Pooping blood and physical collapse

• 129a) On one of the last days of this confinement, I believe it was Saturday May 3^rd, I suddenly pooped blood. One of the nurses took a picture of this and recorded it.

• 129b) I believe the cause of this was, I having had to push extremely hard during the night of April 26^th in order to be able to urinate. When you are restrained to a bed in the IMH, you are expected to pee your pants. During those nine hours I felt extremely frightened, and therefore tense, but I had to urinate, and so I had to push super hard in order to be able to empty my bladder.

• 129c) After pooping blood, I requested to be allowed to go for an MRI, because that’s what I would’ve done had I been at home. I take my physical health extremely seriously.

• 129d) Instead, I was given a rectal exam by an employee. I remember the employee saying I had hemorrhoids, which I had never had before, and I was given some drugs/meds.

• 129e) A few times I put my finger near my anus and smelled it. It smelled like death. I believed I probably had a ruptured appendix. I was ~80% sure that I was going to die that very day. I desperately hoped I’d at least see Phyllis one more time before I died.

• 129f) Later, in the evening, I became so physically weak that I could not make it back to my bed from the toilet. I collapsed on the floor. The right side of my body, especially, had no strength left in it. The nurses had to get a wheelchair to bring me back to my bed, but I could tell they thought I was faking it.

130) I was released from the IMH on May 5^th, but not before I was informed by psychiatrist Lee that the IMH had been in contact with a lawyer named Violet Huang, who represented Janny and the Peelen family. Why, I do not know. Janny later stated in an email that: “We thought IMH and the Singapore government wanted to ‘thwart’ you despite your illness.”, but that makes less than zero sense.

May 2025 - … : The months after my 3^rd confinement

131) May 5^th

• 131a) When I reached my apartment, Phyllis was there.

• 131b) Phyllis had once again stayed at my apartment while I had been confined, in spite of it being totally trashed.

• 131c) In late March and early April, I had allowed myself to unleash some pent-up emotions from all that had been done to me that I was no longer able to keep inside. Better to unleash such emotions on your furniture than to hurt things that have feelings.

• 131d) As a result, the bedroom didn’t have a pillow or a blanket, and the living room was completely trashed and filled with broken furniture and glass shards.

• 131e) Phyllis had nonetheless chosen to sleep in my apartment in the spare bedroom.

• 131f) When I saw Phyllis, she was packing her things and she was about to leave.

• 131g) I burst down crying louder than I had ever cried before.

• 131h) Phyllis left within 1-2 minutes without speaking to me.

• 131i) After she had left, I found a number of food items in my fridge that had already expired, indicating Phyllis had stayed there for at least two weeks prior to May 5^th.

• 131j) I also found my keys at home, which had been missing from my belongings when I had been released, indicating Phyllis had visited the IMH and retrieved them.

132) On May 7^th, I met with Terence. He told me that Violet Huang had told him that there was a restraining order against me by a girl I had met in late 2023, which I could only assume was Laura. I did not take this seriously, because not only did it not make any sense for Laura to have filed for a restraining order against me, there was no way that such a thing could legally be communicated to me in such a strange way.

133) One to two weeks later, I could no longer reach Phyllis via phone, WhatsApp, or Telegram, indicating she had most likely blocked me. I assume she also blocked my email address around this time.

134) In the days after my release, a case worker by the name of Ashraf Muhammad continued to follow up with me, asking me how I was doing. When the IMH received a letter from Terence on May 6th, Ashraf attempted to get information out of me pertaining to the lawsuit.

135) In the aftermath of my 3rd confinement, I was such a mess that my relationship with Terence fell apart, and that he no longer wanted to help me with this lawsuit.

136) My attempt to talk to things out with the IMH

• 136a) Now without a lawyer, I sent an email to the IMH’s Patients Relations Office on Monday June 9^th, in an attempt to reason with it and explain it my grievances.

• 136b) The IMH’s Patients Relations Office refused to communicate with me, and it told me to email the Medical Reports Office instead.

• 136c) A chain of emails followed between the IMH’s Medical Reports Office and I between June 13^th and June 17^th 2025, in which the IMH informed me that it’d respond to me in the form of a medical report.

• 136d) Eights weeks later, the IMH issued something on me to me that it has referred to as a medical report, but referring to which as a medical report is deceit at best.

• 136e) This report did not address any of the concerns I had shared with the IMH regarding its personnel’s actions towards me.

• 136f) The IMH has done nothing but stonewall me, and the IMH has ignored my attempts to talk things out.

• 136g) This has left me with no other option than to pursue legal action.

137) My emotional well-being

• 137a) In the months after my 3rd confinement, I rapidly gained more than 20KG, going from under 70KG to over 90KG.

• 137b) For the remainder of 2025, I was severely suicidal. After my first two confinements I had primarily felt suicidal, and I had only been suicidal a few times. After my third one, I was actively suicidal, and I wanted my life to end one way or another. By my own hands if necessary.

• 137c) There was a moment when I believed I had at most a week or two to live.

• 137d) There were days on which I wanted to jump off of my balcony.

• 137e) I spent a lot of time thinking about how to least unpleasantly end my life.

• 137f) I sent emails to Switzerland’s Dignitas, an assisted-suicide organization, and I attempted to share about this with Phyllis via emails to her.

• 137g) I fantasized about going to New Zealand, bringing my Penguin stuffed animal that Phyllis had given me to the top of a mountain along with a knife, calling Phyllis, and then most likely cutting my wrist and bleeding to death, but having the option to jump off of the mountain at any point, if I felt too much pain.

• 137h) I bought a Swiss Army Knife with “Phyllis ChLaLy” engraved on it, referring to Phyllis, Charmaine, Laura, and Lynette, that I would be able to carry with me when I went outside, so that I could slit my throat at any time that the police decided to come after me again. Unfortunately, the Swiss Army Knife only had a knife, and no other tools, and so I’ve never brought it outside, because I’m scared people might think I’m carrying it to hurt others.

• 137i) I did some sessions with a psychologist by the name Choo Ting @ Private Space Medical, whom I ensured that if I were to be locked up in the IMH one more time, I will 100% for certain kill myself as much as anything can be for certain.

• 137j) From Phyllis’ birthday on September 22^nd 2025 until early January 2026, I only left my apartment twice, because if crying in public is a crime, and leads to physical assault, abduction, three weeks of captivity cut off from the outside world, torture, and mutilation, then I better do my best not to interact with the world, and to stay away from other human beings.

• 137k) At this point, it seems pretty evident that just about everyone hates me, because even COVID, Cancer, and AIDS, all wrapped up into 1 human form, would not have been treated as poorly as I have been.

• 137l) From my 3^rd release from the IMH on May 5^th to the end of 2025, I felt as though I had not only died, but ceased to exist. The person I had been was no more. But for some inexplicable reason, I was still aware of the physical body that had been mine, and this human world that that body was still in.

138) Phyllis

• 138a) I sent Phyllis SGD100k in May 2025 with the reference “you don’t have to work”, because Phyllis doesn’t have to work (although she can if she wants to). To the extent that I am able to, I will give Phyllis all the money she needs.

• 138b) In the months after my 3^rd release, I attempted to talk to Phyllis a few times by going to her childhood house in Woodlands. She was never there, but one time her parents were, who invited me in for a short chat.

• 138c) On Phyllis’ 26^th birthday, I sent her SGD26k, and I left her a number of birthday presents in front of her childhood house in Woodlands, my favorite of which was a self-designed booklet describing my favorite restaurants in Tokyo.

• 138d) In late 2025, I sent Phyllis another SGD400k, because I felt like it.

• 138e) On the morning of Monday the 29^th of December, I noticed on Mobile Legends Bang Bang that Phyllis had played games between 4AM and 7AM. During the three years we spent together, Phyllis had almost never stayed up past 4AM, and so this made me really worried that something unpleasant had happened to her, and so I decided to transfer her SGD100k with the reference “hope helps u, I don’t need”.

• 138f) All in all, I transferred almost SGD650k to Phyllis throughout 2025.

• 138g) The next day, Phyllis’ MLBB match history had been hidden from me. I blamed the universe and I got angry at it, and I decided to refocus my efforts on suing the IMH, which I had put off, because I didn’t know what I’d get out of it. After all, compensation for the things that the IMH has done to me, and has made experience, does not exist.

139) HC/OC 122/2026

• 139a) In January 2026, I emailed over a hundred lawyers in Singapore, both at major law farms, and at smaller boutique firms. Only three of them were willing to meet with me, and only one of them read through an initial rough outline of the case I had written down. I wasn’t even looking for anyone to represent me, because I know what I experienced better than anyone, and so I am able to best tell my own story. I was simply looking for a legal professional to assist me in the complicated legal process. Not a single lawyer was willing to assist.

• 139b) On February 3^rd, I sent Phyllis an email informing her that I was going to file a lawsuit against the IMH and Daniel the next day, and I attached the Statement of Claim to that email.

• 139c) On February 4^th, I filed a lawsuit against the IMH and Daniel at the Singapore Supreme Court as a self-represented litigant. That lawsuit was assigned case number HC/OC 122/2026.

• 139d) On Thursday February 19^th, I went to Mercylight Animal Shelter where Phyllis volunteers. I attempted to tell her about the lawsuit that I had filed at the Singapore Supreme Court, and I said to her that she was a witness in it. Phyllis acted nervously around me, and she quickly walked away from me, so within 30 seconds I apologized and left, and I decided to first try to inform her another way.

• 139e) That afternoon, I messaged the guy she appears to currently be dating, by the name of Louis Chacon, via Instagram. I matter-of-factly informed Louis about the Supreme Court lawsuit that Phyllis was a witness in, and I asked him to relay this information to Phyllis. I also shared with him my concern that Phyllis might be subpoena’ed to court and forced to provide hours of oral testimony about emotionally difficult topics, without having any idea what’s going on.

• 139f) Louis replied to me that evening saying: “Don’t try to see her again at random like today Did I make myself understood?”.

• 139g) The day after on Friday February 20^th, I went to Virgin Active to ask whether there was anyone who was close to Phyllis to whom I could speak about the lawsuit. I was told that Phyllis hadn’t been there for a month.

• 139h) Without any reply from me, Louis messaged me again that day saying: “I wasn’t clear about what I said yesterday ?”, and “I hope for you I’ll never encounter you seriously”.

• 139i) The following day on Saturday February 21^st, I went to Phyllis’ childhood home and I talked to her brother, Solomon, for 5-10 minutes, showing him the Statement of Claim. He browsed through that SoC, and he promised to talk to Phyllis about it. He asked me to send Phyllis another email, which I did that same day, to which I attached the Statement of Claim and a draft of “The Truth About Psychiatry”.

• 139j) Once again without any reply from me, Louis messaged me that day saying: “You’re a fucking psycho men 3 days in a row you’re going to her parents house What’s wrong with you ?”, and “You’re a fck idiot, your lucky that I’m not his brother because I guarantee you that I’m not gonna be gentle with you if you continue”.

• 139k) Louis followed this up by trying to audio call me a bunch of times.

• 139l) Louis appears to me like an insecure child with anger issues. Phyllis always told me she is into older guys/men, not boys/children. Perhaps her dating preferences have changed in recent years.

• 139m) On March 12^th, I tried to talk to Phyllis again about the lawsuit at Mercylight. We had a brief conversation this time, during which I was able to convey to her that there was a Singapore Supreme Court lawsuit. Phyllis said she was going to call the police and she showed me her phone with 999 dialed. She also told me: “whatever you got yourself into this time, leave me out of it”.

• 139n) Still to this day, Phyllis has never told me not to contact her or to stay away from her.

• 139o) On March 16^th, I filed my 41-page affidavit, “The Truth About Psychiatry”, to Singapore’s Supreme Court, in support of an injunction to stop the IMH from confining human beings, unless there exists clear and concise evidence that a human being is likely to end its life in the near future, in order to reduce the amount of harm psychiatry is causing to Singapore citizens.

• 139p) On March 18^th, I delivered a letter, with “The Truth About Psychiatry” attached, to Singapore’s Ministry of Health, to inform it of the summons I had filed for an injunction against the IMH, because I believed the Ministry of Health should have a say in the decision that was going to be made. The mail room employee told me he’d deliver it to “the registry”.

• 139q) During a case conference on March 26^th, I decided that it’d be best to discontinue HC/OC 122/2026 and start anew, because that was the quickest and cleanest way to amend my Originating Claim and Statement of Claim, in which I had used the incorrect UEN for the IMH. I was also seeking to make a few additional changes, which have since turned into a large number of additional changes.

• 139r) I offered to settle HC/OC 122/2026 with the IMH by compensating it up to SGD5k for its legal expenses. Its lawyer replied asking for SGD12k, which seemed much too high, but to which I agreed, because I had better things to do than to argue about money. Human beings were suffering after all.

• 139s) I offered to settle HC/OC 122/2026 with Daniel by compensating him up to SGD1k for his legal expenses. His lawyer replied asking for SGD9,742.80, which seemed outrageously excessive, but to which I agreed, because I had better things to do than to argue about money. Human beings were suffering after all.

The IMH’s reports on me

140) The IMH has issued two reports on me. In its first, the IMH has stated its stance on my Jul/Aug 2024 and Nov/Dec 2024 confinements. In its second, the IMH has stated its stance on my Apr/May 2025 confinement.

141) These reports are attached to this SoC in Appendices A & B on pages 76 and 77.

142) The main author of these reports is Nisha Chandwani.

143) To the best of my knowledge, Nisha has never met me. Although there was an Indian lady present once during a 10-15 minute psychiatrist meeting on either the 9^th, 10^th, or 11^th, of December 2024.

144) To the best of my knowledge, the second author of these reports, Yim Lam Lee, has never met me.

145) Third parties

• 145a) In these reports, Nisha has stated that her findings on me are backed up by a number of 3^rd parties, referred to as: my sister, my brother, my parents, my family, my friend, my private psychologist, my love interest, the police, and IMH employees.

• 145b) Because Nisha has not identified any of them by name, it can’t be known for certain who she is referring to in these reports, so assumptions have to be made.

• 145c) I know that I neither have a sister, nor a brother, nor parents, nor family, nor a love interest, but I can guess which individuals Nisha has attached these labels to on my behalf: Daphne, Wijnand, Janny, Tom, and Phyllis.

• 145d) My “friend” also isn’t very specific, but I can guess that Nisha meant Daniel.

• 145e) My private psychologist presumably refers to Linda.

• 145f) No police officers knew me, so I do not understand why some of Nisha’s findings on me were backed up by the police.

• 145g) Nisha also refers to observations, and such, made by IMH employees.

146 Accuracy of these reports

• 146a) Fundamentally, these reports reflect Nisha’s and Yin Lam’s views on me, that appear to have been based on the views of others.

• 146b) As such, fundamentally these reports describe how 3^rd parties see me, as told by Nisha and Yin Lam, possibly with other IMH personnel in between to relay the information from the 3^rd parties to Nisha.

• 146c) I do not know how these reports came about. I only know that the IMH takes ~2 months to author its reports.

• 146d) I, having lived and experienced all 300,000+ hours of my own life, am obviously the most accurate and direct source of information pertaining to me. And so I’ll set the record straight over the following pages.

July/August 2024

147) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted to the IMH.

• 147a) The word admission implies that I was allowed to enter the IMH.

• 147b) I did not want to enter the IMH, and as such, I cannot have been admitted to the IMH.

• 147c) I was confined to the IMH.

148) Nisha has stated that, I was arrested for an offence of wrongful confinement.

• 148a) The word offence implies that I broke the law.

• 148b) Considering Phyllis’ actions, it’s pretty clear that I did not nothing wrong to her on July 18^th, and so I hadn’t broken the law, and so I had not committed an offence.

• 148c) As such, I cannot have been arrested for any offence, I was arrested because the police decided to arrest me.

• 148d) The police made the decision to arrest me based on the account of a sole 3^rd party (whom had been informed twice by me that I was worried about Phyllis), who said that she thought Phyllis was in danger.

149) Nisha has stated that, I allegedly stopped Phyllis from leaving my residential unit.

• 149a) I did not allegedly stop Phyllis from leaving my residential unit, I stopped Phyllis from leaving my residential unit.

• 149b) I have never, not even once, denied this.

• 149c) I admitted to this in my statement to the police in Cantonment, and this came up in conversations with the IMH’s employees as well.

150) Nisha has stated that, Phyllis is my “love interest”.

• 150a) I do not know how I telling staff that Phyllis was my best friend / girlfriend, turned into Nisha stating in these reports that Phyllis was my “love interest”.

• 150b) Phyllis had had sex with me three times in the 48 hours prior to my confinement, she slept at my apartment during the confinement, and she baked fresh brownies for me the day of my release, not to mention the fact that she slept with me and had sex with me for another month and a half after this confinement.

• 150c) I cannot wrap my head around how “best friend / girlfriend” turned into “love interest”.

151) Nisha has stated that, Janny, Tom, and Daphne are my parents and sister.

• 151a) I neither have parents, nor a sister.

152) Nisha has stated that, I had paranoid delusions against Janny, Tom, and Daphne.

• 152a) Paranoid delusions are fixed false beliefs that others are out to harm you.

• 152b) Intent can only be inferred but never be proven, and therefore it can never be disproven that anyone is out to harm anyone, and therefore paranoid delusions do not exist.

• 152c) This statement attacks beliefs that Nisha claims I have, without any evidence to support that those beliefs are false, and is thereby in violation of International Human Rights Laws that protect the Freedom to Believe, and in violation of Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

• 152d) It seems as though what may have happened is that, after I had shared with IMH employees about my childhood traumas, they heard from Wijnand (and perhaps also Daphne/Janny/Tom) that those were “weird ideas”, causing them to decide that I was delusional. I was the “crazy one” confined to a “mental health hospital” after all.

• 152e) I do not believe that these people are “out to” harm me, I believe that these people can’t help but harm and hurt me, because they hate me. It appears to be in their nature.

153) Nisha has stated that, I experienced auditory hallucinations.

• 153a) A hallucination is the perception of something not present.

• 153b) Something perceived is present by definition, in the perception of the individual perceiving it.

• 153c) Hallucinations do not exist.

• 153d) My best guess is that some IMH employees thought that I was hearing voices based on my behavior during the first four days, which was heavily influenced by the torture that I was the object of, and the brain-rewiring drugs that were being injected into me.

154) Nisha has stated that, I had delusions that I was able to communicate with others telepathically.

• 154a) Earlier in this SoC, I used the word telepathy to describe something I experienced. This does not mean that I believe I am able to communicate with others telepathically.

• 154b) Regardless of whether I held the belief that I was able to communicate with others telepathically, Nisha has no right to label such a belief as a delusion.

• 154c) Beliefs by definition lack supporting evidence, and they cannot be labeled as delusions without providing evidence proving they are false.

• 154d) Doing so is in direct violation of International Human Rights Laws and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

155) Nisha has stated that, Wijnand, Daniel, Linda, and Phyllis, all corroborated that, I had paranoid delusions and experienced auditory hallucinations, neither of which exist, and that, I was delusional in a belief I allegedly held.

• 155a) Did Phyllis really tell someone at the IMH that I believed “my parents and sister” were out to harm me? And did she also tell that person that that was a delusion? I doubt it.

• 155b) Nisha has essentially stated that, Wijnand, Daniel, Linda, and Phyllis are all criminals, by stating that they all have violated International Human Rights Laws and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

• 155c) Even if Phyllis has said this, she is not a criminal. Phyllis can say whatever she wants about me with zero consequences.

156) Nisha has stated that, Wijnand, Daniel, Linda, and Phyllis, all noticed my speech had become disorganised and irrelevant.

• 156a) Saying that someone’s words are disorganised is subjective.

• 156b) Saying that someone’s words are irrelevant is essentially saying someone’s words don’t matter.

• 156c) Nisha has said that these people have said that my words are irrelevant…

• 156d) This is not medicine you guys… this is he said / she said.

157) Nisha has stated that, my speech was observed to be disorganised and irrelevant during the early part of my confinement.

• 157a) When you confine, torture, (non-sexually) rape, mutilate, and drug someone, it should not come as a surprise that that person’s speech is affected.

• 157b) So Nisha was told by nurses that, in their opinions, my speech was “disorganised” and “irrelevant” while I was drugged up and strapped to beds?

• 157c) And this is supposed to constitute evidence that I have / had a “mental illness”?

158) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted and detained for treatment.

• 158a) This statement makes zero sense. You can’t admit and detain someone. You can only admit a person in accordance with its will, and you can only detain a person against its will.

• 158b) Personally, I wouldn’t call the following treatment:
  - Confinement against your will
  - Restraint
  - Torture
  - (non-sexual) Rape
  - Coercion to take brain-rewiring drugs
  - Relationship interference
  - Reconnecting you to a person who stated all your childhood traumas are “weird ideas”
  - Keeping you away from the person who loves you the most

• 158c) I guess these technically constitute forms of treatment, but it’s hard to believe Singapore citizens consent to the IMH subjecting human beings to this kind of treatment on their behalfs.

159) Nisha has stated that, I was assessed to be suffering from a mental illness called Schizophreniform disorder.

• 159a) Suffering is a subjective experience, and what constitutes suffering is a subjective judgment made by each individual on its own behalf.

• 159b) As such, neither Nisha, nor anyone else not named Frank Lee, can claim on behalf of me that I was suffering, or what I was suffering from.

• 159c) The medical community uses the term “illness” to refer to subjective/internal experiences, and as such illnesses can neither be diagnosed, nor assessed by 3^rd parties.

• 159d) If Nisha meant to state that, I was diagnosed with a mind disease, there is neither scientific evidence to support the existence of a human mind, nor to support the existences of diseases of such a mind.

160) Nisha has stated that, it was necessary for Phyllis’ protection that I be detained.

• 160a) Other than random people in public, such as waiters at restaurants, hotel employees, and such, no other human being had ever seen Phyllis and I together at this point in time, because we had never introduced each other to each other’s friends.

• 160b) Small footnotes:
  - Linda had seen Phyllis drop me off at therapy once.
  - On July 14^th, Daniel had briefly been in the same apartment as Phyllis and I, while Phyllis was in another room. Phyllis left shortly after Daniel’s arrival.

• 160c) It’s BEYOND LUDICROUS to factually state in something, which you tell the world is a medical report, that one human being is a danger to another human being, without ever even having seen them in the same room together.

• 160d) It’s EVEN MORE INSANE to have confined, tortured, and altered a human being, because it was supposedly a danger to a person you had never even seen it in the same room as.

• 160e) I was evidently not a danger to Phyllis. Phyllis’ actions clearly show this. Actions speak louder than words.

• 160f) If not for Phyllis’ protection, for what reason was I locked up, tortured, and altered? I’d say this reeks of “making something up after the fact”, but the IMH has done the same thing to me three times for the same bullshit reason.

161) Nisha has stated that, I was deemed to be less dangerous to Phyllis after a period of, what she refers to as, inpatient treatment.

• 161a) Phyllis had not seen me for almost three weeks when I was released, and so, Phyllis could neither have assessed, nor communicated to anyone at the IMH, whether I was now more, less, or equally as, dangerous, or undangerous, to her as compared to three weeks prior.

• 161b) I was never asked for my opinion on whether I thought I was now less dangerous to Phyllis as compared to three weeks prior.

• 161c) No other party can credibly claim that I was less dangerous to Phyllis after a period of involuntary confinement, torture, non-sexual rape, and mutilation via the forced consumption of brain-rewiring drugs.

162) Nisha has stated that, I was discharged from the IMH.

• 162a) The word “discharge” implies that the IMH is a hospital, which it is not.

• 162b) As such, I was not discharged from the IMH.

• 162c) I was released from the IMH.

163) Nisha has stated that, I opted to seek outpatient treatment with a private psychiatrist of my choice.

• 163a) The private psychiatrist was chosen by Daniel.

• 163b) I was pressured into seeing a private psychiatrist by the IMH’s psychiatrists.

• 163c) The lawyer, who had been hired for me by Wijnand, incorrectly convinced me that I needed to see a private psychiatrist, in order to defend myself in the police investigation against me.

• 163d) As such, it’s a real stretch to say that I “opted” to see a private psychiatrist.

November/December 2024

164) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted to the IMH.

• 164a) The word admission implies that I was allowed to enter the IMH.

• 164b) I did not want to enter the IMH, and as such I cannot have been admitted to the IMH.

• 164c) I was confined to the IMH.

165) Nisha has stated that, I now also had paranoid delusions against Wijnand and Daniel.

• 165a) Paranoid delusions do not exist.

• 165b) This statement is in violation of International Human Rights Laws and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

• 165c) How did this statement come about? Did Nisha determine, based on perhaps having been in the same room as me for 10-15 minutes, that I believed Wijnand and Daniel were out to harm me? Did she then also talk to Wijnand and Daniel and determine that they were nice guys that I should keep in touch with?

• 165d) I never even mentioned Wijnand to any of the IMH’s staff in Nov/Dec 2024.

• 165e) This reads as Wijnand being pissed I forbid psychiatrist Sun from sharing about me with him on Dec 11^th, and Daniel being pissed for I not wanting to see him again after he had betrayed me on Nov 21^st.

166) Nisha has stated that, I still had a delusional belief in telepathy at this time, that sometimes manifested as auditory hallucinations.

• 166a) Hallucinations do not exist.

• 166b) The IMH’s employees are free to hold whatever opinions they want about whatever beliefs they may think I have, but passing those off as facts in, what you tell the world is a medical report, is a crime.

• 166c) This statement is in violation of International Human Rights Laws and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

167) Nisha has stated that, Wijnand corroborated that my “condition” had worsened.

• 167a) Wijnand had not had any contact with me in the prior 3 months.

• 167b) Either Wijnand has lied to the IMH about me, or the IMH has lied about what Wijnand has said about me.

• 167c) Does my condition worsen when I decide to no longer have contact with Wijnand?

168) Nisha has stated that, Phyllis corroborated that my “condition” had worsened.

• 168a) Phyllis hadn’t spoken to me for almost two months, and she had only seen me for a few hours while Daniel was betraying me.

• 168b) Phyllis did not have much insight in to how I was doing on November 21^st.

169) Nisha has stated that, Daniel corroborated that my “condition” had worsened.

• 169a) Daniel deeply hates me, as proven by his actions on November 21^st.

• 169b) Nothing Daniel told the IMH in regards to me on, or after, November 21^st can be taken seriously.

170) Nisha has stated that, I exhibited psychotic symptoms.

• 170a) Psychosis means to have lost contact with reality.

• 170b) Every individual has a different view of what reality is. Phyllis taught me this.

• 170c) As such, stating that, from your perspective, someone is psychotic, is in essence stating that their world view is different from yours.

• 170d) Everyone has a different worldview, and so everyone is at least somewhat psychotic to everyone.

171) Nisha has stated that, my speech was observed to be “disorganised” and “irrelevant”.

• 171a) These are vague and subjective observations that do not belong in a medical report.

• 171b) Calling my speech “disorganised” and “irrelevant” is hateful.

172) Nisha has stated that, I sent threatening messages to, what she refers to as, my parents.

• 172a) I did not.

• 172b) In October 2024, I felt such intense hatred towards Janny and Tom that I emailed them “hurry up and die”, which was a request, not a threat.

• 172c) Private messages have no business being included in a medical report.

• 172d) This reads as Janny and Tom complaining to the IMH about an email I had sent them.

173) Nisha has stated that, I sent threatening messages to Phyllis.

• 173a) I have never threatened Phyllis.

• 173b) I will never threaten Phyllis.

• 173c) Phyllis’ and my relationship is none of the IMH’s business.

174) Nisha has stated that, I harassed Phyllis by showing up at her house and workplace on numerous occasions against her wish.

• 174a) Numerous occasions is false. I showed up to Phyllis’ workplace once on November 20^th 2024, when I was told she wasn’t there. November 21^st 2024 was the first time I ever visited Phyllis’ house.

• 174b) Phyllis has still, to this day, never communicated to me that she does not want me to show up at her house or workplace.

• 174c) During the 3+ years Phyllis and I knew each other, Phyllis showed up unannounced at my apartment countles times, even after I had told her that I wanted her to txt/call first.

• 174d) Phyllis showed up unannounced at my apartment in February and March 2025.

• 174e) Phyllis slept at my apartment, unannounced, each time I was confined to the IMH, for three weeks each time.

• 174f) Nisha has hereby stated, via implication, that, while Phyllis moved all her clothes back into my apartment and was sleeping at my apartment, both unannounced, she told the IMH that I going to Virgin Active, a public gym, and I ringing her doorbell were against her will.

• 174g) Either this, or someone at the IMH is claiming to be able to read Phyllis’ mind, the concept of which the IMH tortures out of its victims.

175) Nisha has stated that, I shared my intent to punch Daniel with its staff.

• 175a) On November 25^th 2024, after I had shared with the IMH’s psychiatrists that Daniel had betrayed me, they asked me whether I wanted to see him again, and I told them I’d punch him if I saw him.

• 175b) I wouldn’t actually have punched Daniel, because I understand that it’s against the law, and I don’t want to spend any more time in jail.

• 175c) The IMH has continuously, at every opportunity, chosen to believe I’m delusional, but in this one specific instance, in which my words made me look worse, has interpreted them as intent.

• 175d) If you look up the word “hatred” in the dictionary, this is what you will find.

176) Nisha has stated that, I was assessed to be suffering from a mental illness called Schizophrenia.

• 176a) Suffering is a subjective experience, and what constitutes suffering is a subjective judgment made by each individual on its own behalf.

• 176b) As such, neither Nisha, nor anyone else not named Frank Lee, can claim on behalf of me that I was suffering, or what I was suffering from.

• 176c) The medical community uses the term “illness” to refer to subjective/internal experiences, and as such illnesses can neither be diagnosed, nor assessed by outsiders.

• 176d) If Nisha meant to state that, I was diagnosed with a mind disease, there is neither scientific evidence to support the existence of a human mind, nor to support the existences of diseases of such a mind.

177) Nisha has stated that, I was confined because it was deemed necessary primarily for the protection of Phyllis.

• 177a) Other than random people in public, such as waiters at restaurants, hotel employees, and such, no other human being had ever seen Phyllis and I together at this point in time, because we had never introduced each other to each other’s friends.

• 177b) Small footnotes:
  - Linda had seen Phyllis drop me off at therapy once.
  - On July 14^th, Daniel had briefly been in the same apartment as Phyllis and I, while Phyllis was in another room. Phyllis left shortly after Daniel’s arrival.
  - Dalilah had seen us for 5 minutes in September.
  - Phyllis had been present when Daniel betrayed me over the course of a few hours.

• 177c) It’s BEYOND LUDICROUS to factually state in something, which you tell the world is a medical report, that one human being is a danger to another human being, without ever even having seen them in the same room together.

• 177d) It’s EVEN MORE INSANE to have confined, tortured, and altered a human being, because it was supposedly a danger to a person you had never even seen it in the same room as.

• 177e) I was evidently not a danger to Phyllis. Phyllis’ actions clearly show this. Actions speak louder than words.

• 177f) If not for Phyllis’ protection, for what reason was I locked up, tortured, and altered? I’d say this reeks of “making something up after the fact”, but the IMH has done the same thing to me three times for the same bullshit reason.

178) Nisha has stated that, Phyllis planned to set clear boundaries with me, and that, she considered applying for a restraining order against me.

• 178a) Okay, let’s tackle this one.

• 178b) Unless someone at the IMH read Phyllis’ mind, Nisha has clearly implied that, some IMH employee had a conversation with Phyllis about she setting boundaries with me and applying for a restraining order against me, at the same time as Phyllis moved her clothes back into my apartment, slept at my apartment, and went out of her way to buy a figurine for my bedroom with the words “love” and “sad” on it.

• 178c) THIS IS A CRIME. Some employee brought up these topics with Phyllis and put thoughts into her head. This alone proves that individuals have attempted to separate Phyllis and I, something which they’ve succeeded in doing.

• 178d) I’ve been told that the IMH’s employees saw me as their patient and Phyllis as my love interest. In what world do you talk to your patient’s love interest and tell her to set boundaries with him and apply for a restraining order against him, essentially telling her to cut him off?

• 178e) This was communicated to Phyllis from a position of “we’re experts, we know what’s best for Frank”. As such, Phyllis was essentially told to cut off what was / had been the most important person in her life for that person.

179) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted and detained for treatment.

• 179a) This statement makes zero sense. You can’t admit and detain someone. You can only admit a person in accordance with its will, and you can only detain a person against its will.

• 179b) Personally, I wouldn’t call the following treatment:
  - Confinement against your will
  - Restraint
  - Torture
  - Rape
  - Coercion to take brain-rewiring drugs
  - Relationship interference
  - Telling the person that loves you the most to set boundaries with you and apply for a restraining order against you

• 179c) I guess these technically constitute forms of treatment, but it’s hard to believe Singapore citizens consent to the IMH subjecting human beings to this kind of treatment on their behalfs.

180) Nisha has stated that, I was deemed to be less dangerous to Phyllis after a period of, what she refers to as, inpatient treatment.

• 180a) Nisha has hereby stated that, involuntary confinement, torture, rape, and mutilation via brain-rewiring, made me less dangerous to Phyllis.

• 180b) No, it didn’t. Phyllis liked me for three years, and as the IMH started altering me, our relationship fell apart.

181) Nisha has stated that, I was discharged from the IMH.

• 181a) The word “discharge” implies the IMH is a hospital, which it is not.

• 181b) As such, I was not discharged from the IMH.

• 181c) I was released from the IMH.

April/May 2025

182) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted to the IMH.

• 182a) The word admission implies that I was allowed to enter the IMH.

• 182b) I did not want to enter the IMH, and as such I cannot have been admitted to the IMH.

• 182c) I was confined to the IMH.

183) Nisha has stated that, I was brought to the IMH by the police, due to concerns about being of unsound mind.

• 183a) Hereby, Nisha has stated that the police violated the law, because being of “unsound mind” is not enough legal ground to transport an individual to the IMH.

184) Nisha has stated that, my mood was observed to be labile and irritable.

• 184a) I had been physically assaulted, abducted, and once again confined to the facility that had tortured, raped, and mutilated me two times already.

• 184b) If I had been unaffected by this, there would’ve been something very very wrong with me.

• 184c) I was far more than just labile and irritable.

• 184d) I only appearing labile and irritable to IMH personnel, under these circumstances, is a tremendous show of my self-restraint.

185) Nisha has stated that, I hit my head against the wall.

• 185a) I did not do this.

• 185b) I may have bumped my head against the wall a few times, out of boredom and/or frustration, but there is nothing wrong with that, unless I am supposed to be a robot who sits in a bed all day staring blankly into the distance.

• 185c) At no point did any nurse ask me not to do this.

• 185d) I also paced around the ward a lot to kill time.

186) Nisha has stated that, I had delusional beliefs that Phyllis was still in a romantic relationship with me.

• 186a) C’mon now… really?

• 186b) At some point during my 3^rd confinement another victim told me to tell Phyllis to kill herself. I got super mad at him, and I yelled to the nurses that that man had told me to tell my suicidal girlfriend to kill herself. So I referred to Phyllis as my girlfriend once during my confinement in a moment of anger. I personally don’t like labels, but others seem to always ask for them.

• 186c) This doesn’t mean that I wasn’t aware that Phyllis’ and my relationship was no longer the same it had been a year prior.

• 186d) Also, in a way Nisha has stated here that I’m delusional for believing in love.

187) Nisha has stated that, I believed that Phyllis was in danger, and that, I continued to express concerns that she was suicidal.

• 187a) So it’s a bad thing for I to be concerned about Phyllis’ life? That seems to me what Nisha is implying here, by having included it in what she intended to be a medical report, which was supposed to explain her employer’s treatment of me for a mind disease that I supposedly had.

• 187b) Phyllis had been suicidal for a year and a half to the point of knife cut marks, and had then had her most important relationship destroyed by 3^rd parties. As such, my concerns for Phyllis’ well-being were legitimate.

• 187c) Nisha has essentially stated here that concern for Phyllis’ life is (part of) a medical disease with a physiological cause.

188) Nisha has stated that, the IMH received accounts from people she refers to as my family and friend, on my “mental state”, and that, these people corroborated that it had deteriorated since my last release from the IMH.

• 188a) What business does this statement have being in this report? I had not had any contact with any of these people for months / years.

189) Nisha has stated that, I sent strange voicemails and messages, with paranoid delusions as well as possible auditory hallucinations.

• 189a) Neither paranoid delusions nor hallucinations exist.

• 189b) The phrase “possible auditory hallucinations” does not belong in a medical report, just like the phrase “possible broken bone” does not belong in a medical report.

• 189c) Imagine going to a hospital, your doctor stating that you have a possible broken bone, and you being restrained, brought under, and operated on. The next day, you wake up and are discharged. You hire a lawyer to sue the hospital. Only to then find out that, in its “medical report”, the hospital states that you possibly had a broken bone...

• 189d) Private voicemails and messages do not belong in a medical report.

• 189e) I don’t even know what voicemails and messages Nisha is referring to here.

• 189f) Not to mention, whose opinion is it that my voicemails and messages were “strange”? Nisha’s? Someone else’s?

190) Nisha has stated that, I was admitted and detained for treatment in accordance with the provisions of the MHCTA.

• 190a) This statement makes zero sense. You can’t admit and detain someone. You can only admit a person in accordance with its will, and you can only detain a person against its will.

• 190b) The MHCTA 7(1) states that an individual brought to the IMH has be “taken together with a report of the facts of the case”.

• 190c) I was brought straight to the IMH by two individuals wearing police uniforms, without a statement having been taken down, and so what was done to me was not in accordance with the provisions of the MHCTA.

• 190d) Personally, I wouldn’t call the following treatment:
  - Confinement against your will
  - Restraint
  - Torture
  - (non-sexual) Rape
  - Coercion to take brain-rewiring drugs
  - Relationship interference
  - Completely cutting you off from the outside world for three weeks

• 190e) I guess these technically constitute forms of treatment, but it’s hard to believe Singapore citizens consent to the IMH subjecting human beings to this kind of treatment on their behalfs.

191) Nisha has stated that, I was assessed to be suffering from a mental illness called Schizophrenia.

• 191a) Suffering is a subjective experience, and what constitutes suffering is a subjective judgment made by each individual on its own behalf.

• 191b) As such, neither Nisha, nor anyone else not named Frank Lee, can claim on behalf of me that I was suffering, or what I was suffering from.

• 191c) The medical community uses the term “illness” to refer to subjective/internal experiences, and as such illnesses can neither be diagnosed, nor assessed by outsiders.

• 191d) If Nisha meant to state that, I was diagnosed with a mind disease, there is neither scientific evidence to support the existence of a human mind, nor to support the existences of diseases of such a mind.

192) Nisha has stated that, the IMH’s assessment of my “mental state” and “risk issues” was partly based on a police report following a police investigation.

• 192a) I have yet to be made aware of any police investigation against me, other than the one by IO Rohana, which concluded in November 2024 that there had been no wrongdoing on my part.

• 192b) I do not know what this investigation, if it were to exist, could possibly be about other than I having cried in public, if that were to constitute a crime.

• 192c) Police investigations usually follow a police report, not the other way around.

• 192d) Nisha has stated that, the IMH’s ?medical? assessment of me was partly based on police findings.

193) Nisha has stated that, its assessment of me was based on serial interviews and corroborative accounts from, Janny, Tom, Daphne, Wijnand, Daniel, and Phyllis.

• 193a) Nisha has for a second time stated that, the IMH’s ?medical? assessment of me was partly based on interviews with, and accounts from, non-doctors.

• 193b) Nisha has stated that, Phyllis agrees with the IMH’s assessment of me.

• 193c) I can all but assure you that Phyllis does not agree with this “assessment”. It’s all-but-certain that the IMH has lied and put words in Phyllis’ mouth.

• 193d) The IMH’s assessment of me only being based on corroborative accounts is the textbook definition of “confirmation bias”.

• 193e) Phyllis had barely had any contact with me for months, and these others had had zero contact with me for months / years.

194) Nisha has stated that, I was confined because it was deemed necessary, primarily for the protection of Phyllis.

• 194a) Nisha has stated that, I was confined, tortured, and altered, three times, for the protection of the person I care about the most.

• 194b) Nisha has implied that, everything the IMH has done to me, was done to me for Phyllis.

195) Nisha has stated, I was discharged from the IMH.

• 195a) The word “discharge” implies the IMH is a hospital, which it is not.

• 195b) As such, I was not discharged from the IMH.

• 195c) I was released from the IMH.

In Summary

196) These reports are beyond insane. This is absolutely not medicine, and these are absolutely not medical reports.

197) In these reports on me, Nisha has completely ignored, what was far and away the most logical and best source of information, I, except for in the one instance where my words were to my own detriment.

198) These reports are fabrications about me from the imaginations of 3^rd parties who barely had any information about me. Many statements in these reports admit to crimes, the clearest examples of which are:

• 198a) The IMH has stated that it interfered in Phyllis’ and my relationship, and that it has attempted to get Phyllis to cut me off.

• 198c) The IMH has attacked my beliefs without evidence that they are false, which is in violation of International Human Rights Laws and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

• 198d) The IMH has admitted to confining me for, what it has stated, was the protection of Phyllis, even though evidence to support that I was a danger to Phyllis cannot have existed.

• 198d) The IMH has stated that it sees concern for Phyllis’ life as (part of) a medical disease.

199) Reading between the lines:

• 199a) The IMH is claiming to possess the types of supernatural psychic abilities that it tortures out of its victims, because it presents as facts many things it cannot know, such as what I perceive auditorily, what my beliefs are, and that I was a danger to and needed to be locked up for the protection of Phyllis. The only other possible explanation is that the IMH has intentionally fabricated false reports on me.

• 199b) The IMH is doing its absolute utmost to prevent Phyllis and I from being together. It has:
  - Talked to Phyllis about setting boundaries and applying for a restraining order.
  - Told me Phyllis doesn’t love me, by referring to our relationship as “a one-sided interested in love”.
  - Told me it confined, tortured, raped, and altered me, because it was in Phyllis’ best interest.
  - Reconnected me to Wijnand instead of asking Phyllis to call/visit in Jul/Aug ‘24
  - Blocked me from calling Phyllis via the ward phone on Nov 25^th-27^th ‘24
  - etc. etc. etc.
  It’s a pattern.

• 199c) The IMH is an outlet for all the people who hate me (Janny, Tom, Daphne, Wijnand, Daniel), to talk shit about me and destroy my life. The IMH has based these reports on me (and likely also its “treatment” of me) on the opinions, beliefs, and desires of these 3^rd parties. By law, IMH personnel had to act in my best interest, but they appear to have acted solely in the best interest of individuals who hate me.

Crimes

Pre 199-201) I think it’s pretty obvious at this point that the IMH’s confinements of me were all wrong and against my will, but just in case you’re not convinced yet, allow me to spell it all out for you.

199) Wrongful Confinement #1 – July/August 2024 – Penal Code 340

• 199a) Phyllis chose to remain in my apartment on July 18^th when I went for a walk, after I had physically prevented her from leaving.

• 199b) Phyllis declined to press charges against me for my actions on July 18^th, the state pressed charges.

• 199c) Phyllis stayed in my apartment and slept in my bedroom while I was confined.

• 199d) Phyllis baked fresh brownies, cut fresh watermelon, and left a post-it note for me on the day of my release.

• 199e) Phyllis reconnected with me 10 days after my release.

• 199f) Phyllis slept together with me for a month and a half after my release.

• 199g) Phyllis went on dates with me after my release.

• 199h) Phyllis told me she loves me after my release.

• 199i) Phyllis continued to talk to me about spending her life with me after my release.

• 199j) The above actions not only show Phyllis did not believe I was a danger to her on July 18^th, they show that Phyllis felt safe around me and in my apartment.

• 199k) Phyllis is the best judge of who was a danger to her.

• 199l) The IMH’s 1^st confinement of me was wrong.

• 199m) The IMH’s actions were neither in Phyllis’ nor my best interest.

200) Wrongful Confinement #2 – November/December 2024 – Penal Code 340

• 200a) On the morning of November 21^st 2024, Phyllis chose to sit next to me for 20-25 minutes instead of ordering a Grab to Mercylight Animal Shelter.

• 200b) Phyllis met me at my apartment on November 21^st.

• 200c) Phyllis visited me twice during my 2^nd confinement.

• 200d) Phyllis stayed over at my place during this confinement.

• 200e) Phyllis moved her clothes back into my apartment during this confinement.

• 200f) Phyllis went out of her way to buy a cute figurine for my bedroom with the words “love” and “sad” on it.

• 200g) Phyllis met me on the day of my release to book a hotel room for me.

• 200h) Phyllis went back to my apartment with me on the day of my release.

• 200i) Phyllis talked to me for an hour at my apartment on February 10^th 2025.

• 200j) Phyllis talked to me for an hour at my apartment on March 13^th 2025.

• 200k) The above actions not only show Phyllis did not believe I was a danger to her on November 21^st 2024, they show that Phyllis felt safe around me and in my apartment.

• 200l) Phyllis is the best judge of who was a danger to her.

• 200m) The IMH’s 2^nd confinement of me was wrong.

• 200n) The IMH’s actions were neither in Phyllis’ nor my best interest.

201) Wrongful Confinement #3 – April/May 2025 – Penal Code 340

• 201a) My apartment was completely trashed. The main bedroom could not be slept in, and the entire living room was full of broken furniture and glass shards.

• 201b) In spite of this, Phyllis chose to stay in my apartment’s spare bedroom.

• 201c) This choice of hers not only shows Phyllis did not believe I was a danger to her on April 17^th 2025, it indicates Phyllis knows I would never hurt her on such a deep level, that it disproves I was ever a danger to her.

• 201d) Phyllis is the best judge of who was a danger to her.

• 201e) The IMH’s 3^rd confinement of me was wrong.

• 201f) The IMH’s actions were neither in Phyllis’ nor my best interest.

202) Illegal Wrongful Confinements & Article 9 of Singapore’s Constitution & Penal Code 340

• 202a) As per the above, all three of the IMH’s confinements of me were wrong, and all three were in violation of Penal Code 340.

• 202b) Furthermore, the IMH itself has admitted that, all three confinements of me were illegal, by admitting that it acted in, what it was under the delusion was, Phyllis’ best interest. This violated the law that states that the IMH had to act in, what was legally considered to be, its patient’s best interest.

• 202c) On April 17^th 2025, I was transported to and involuntarily confined to the IMH, without the facts of the case, which violated the MHCTA.

• 202d) The fact that all three of my confinements were illegal, means that they were not in accordance with the law, which means that the IMH has violated Article 9(1) of Singapore’s Constitution.

203) Inhumane treatment during confinements

• 203a) IMH staff used physical strength to overpower me and restrain me to beds.

• 203b) I was left restrained to beds for the better parts of days and overnight on numerous occasions.

• 203c) I was raped. This is the best word to describe some of the things that were done to me.

• 203d) My brain was rewired via injections and coerced consumption of psychiatric drugs, without so much as a single piece of evidence, let alone proof, that there was anything wrong with my brain.

• 203e) I was undeniably tortured. There is no other way to look at the IMH’s actions against me from November 25^th to November 27^th 2024. And many of its other actions against me also constitute torture.

• 203f) I was completely cut off from the outside world from April 17^th to May 5^th 2025. I was not allowed to make phone calls, nor allowed to have my phone, nor allowed to have any visitors.

• 203g) I was stonewalled by IMH personnel from November 22^nd to November 25^th, when I asked why I was being kept against my will.

204) Mutilation & Alteration

IMH personnel mutilated me, by injecting brain-rewiring drugs into me against my will, and by forcing me to, at times even via torture, take psychiatric drugs against my will. These drugs rewired my brain and changed who I was on the inside.

205) Rape

Although today’s society does not recognize non-sexual rape as a thing, rape is the word that most accurately describes some of the things that IMH personnel did to me, especially their actions on November 25^th and 26^th 2024. I have explained why this is so in more detail in “The Truth About Psychiatry”.

206) Relationship Interference & Destruction

• 206a) The only two individuals, who can credibly comment on what caused Phyllis’ and my relationship to fall apart, are Phyllis and I. Other than random people in public, no one has ever even really seen us together.

• 206b) I state that it was evidently primarily because of the IMH that our relationship fell apart. Other than her trip to Europe in Dec’22, Phyllis and I had never spent more than 2-3 weeks apart when I was first confined to the IMH. After this forceful separation, and after I had been altered, it took less than a month and a half for our relationship to completely fall apart, in my eyes clearly as a result of the IMH’s actions.

• 206c) The IMH has stated that its treatment of me made me less and less dangerous to Phyllis each time, but Phyllis’ actions, which should be looked at as the #1 indicator of how she sees me in respect to her, clearly say the opposite. Phyllis’ actions clearly say that she wanted to be around me less and less, each time the IMH had locked me up and “treated” me.

• 206d) The only other credible perspective of what caused our relationship to fall apart is Phyllis’. However, Phyllis has not been informed of what was done to me. Phyllis does not know what psychiatry truly is. And Phyllis has not seen the IMH’s reports on me that are full of nonsense and hatred.

• 206e) As such, until after she has been informed of everything that the IMH has done to us, Phyllis cannot credibly comment on what caused our relationship to fall apart. And as such, at this point in time, my perspective is the only credible one as to what caused Phyllis’ and my relationship to fall apart, and as such, for the time being, it is fact that the IMH is the #1 reason Phyllis’ and my relationship fell apart.

• 206f) Furthermore, independently verifiable evidence to support this is scattered throughout this SoC. The following are the biggest pieces of evidence.

• 206g) The IMH put thoughts into Phyllis’ head about setting boundaries with me and applying for a restraining order against me, while she clearly still had feelings for me. Unaware of its actions or not, the IMH employee who did this attempted to get Phyllis to cut me off. This point alone proves intent as much as it can be proven, and validates my stance that the IMH caused the destruction of Phyllis’ and my relationship.

• 206h) The IMH’s decisions to confine me caused not only Phyllis, but also the world, to incorrectly see me as a severely “mentally ill” person. This changed how Phyllis, and the people around Phyllis, saw me, impacting Phyllis’ decisions regarding our relationship.

• 206i) In its reports, the IMH has shared its incorrect perspective on me. This perspective was communicated to Phyllis through conversations between her and IMH personnel. From Phyllis’ perspective, these people were experts on what was wrong with “mentally ill” Frank, and so the IMH’s incorrect perspective on me incorrectly came across as credible. As such, Phyllis now likely believes the IMH’s delusions such as, I being a danger to her, and she being my love interest and not loving me.

• 206j) The IMH’s torture, and other inhumane treatment, of me severely traumatized me. I was a mess in the wake of each confinement, becoming more and more suicidal each and every time. I was no longer able to be a rock for Phyllis and be her #1 source of comfort, which negatively impacted our relationship.

• 206k) The IMH rewired my brain, and thereby altered me, three times. Not only did I like the way I used to be, Phyllis also liked the way I was, but she has clearly come to like me less and less every time the IMH altered me.

• 206l) The IMH pressured me to see a private psychiatrist after my confinement, and thereby pressured me to continue taking psychiatric drugs in August and September 2024. These drugs made me feel terrible, changed who I was, and negatively impacted my behavior. These all contributed to Phyllis’ and my relationship falling apart during the same period.

• 206m) The IMH clearly kept Phyllis away from me during my 1^st confinement, in spite of she being my #1 emotional support and the person closest to me. The IMH also blocked me from reaching Phyllis for three days on Nov 25^th-27^th 2024 as an additional tactic, the IMH blocked me from calling Phyllis, my emergency contact, during my 3^rd confinement, and I also strongly suspect that the IMH blocked Phyllis from visiting me during my 3^rd confinement.

• 206n) The IMH has communicated to me that, from its perspective, Phyllis doesn’t love me, by referring to her as my love interest in its reports.

• 206o) There is further circumstantial evidence, in the form of all but 1 of my relationships falling apart between July 2024 and May 2025. Not only is it evident that the IMH is the cause of them falling apart, because why else would all of my relationships suddenly fall apart over the span of these specific 10 months, it also supports that the IMH was the primary cause of Phyllis’ and my relationship falling apart.

• 206p) Lastly, the IMH has done its best to reconnect me to individuals to whom I want to have no connection.

• 206q) The IMH handed my personal belongings to Daniel twice without my consent.

• 206r) The IMH informed Wijnand and Daphne of my 1^st confinement without my consent and against my will.

• 206s) The IMH got Wijnand to call me daily on the ward phone in Jul/Aug 2024.

• 206t) The IMH again informed Wijnand I had been confined in Nov/Dec 2024, again without my consent.

• 206u) In spite of I having communicated to psychiatrist Sun on Dec 11^th 2024 that I forbid the IMH from communicating to Wijnand about me, the IMH again informed various 3^rd parties that I had been confined in Apr/May 2025. I had listed Phyllis as my emergency contact, but in its reports the IMH has stated that it talked behind my back to people I had completely kicked out of my life many many months / years ago.

207) Unsubstantiated, Hurtful, Incorrect, Hateful, and What-not “Medical Reports”

In its reports on me, the IMH has presented almost nothing but unsubstantiated and hurtful opinions on and beliefs pertaining to me. There are almost no facts in these reports, and they contain zero evidence, and zero logical reasoning. Instead, the IMH has stated that its opinions and beliefs are supposedly backed up by third parties who, with the exception of Phyllis in Jul/Aug 2024, range from having little access to relevant information, to having no access to relevant information, to an individual who undeniably hated me, Daniel.

208) Violation of the MHCTA

The MHCTA was broken on April 17^th, when I was transported against my will by two individuals in police uniforms straight to the IMH, and confined without the facts of the case.

209) Article 9 of Singapore’s Constitution or Physical Assault & Abduction

If what was done to me on April 17^th 2025 was arrest, I have to this day not been informed of the grounds of my arrest, which would be in violation of Article 9(3) of Singapore’s Constitution. If it wasn’t arrest, then it can only be viewed as physical assault and abduction.

210) Cheating – Penal Code 415

Daniel broke the law (penal code 415 – Cheating) on November 21^st 2024, when he used lies, deceit, pressure tactics, and emotional manipulation to get me wrongfully confined to the IMH, after having legally promised to do everything in his power to keep me out of the IMH. Not only did Daniel lie about where we were going, he also lied about what we were going to do. It’s clear that his intentions were not to bring me for a health check-up.

211) Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Even though a certificate for the Form 2 LPA had not yet been issued, Daniel had signed my LPA on the portal, which constitutes a legal promise from him to me. By doing everything in his power to get me locked up in the IMH, Daniel not only broke his legal promise, he reversed it.

• If Daniel had stood idly by while others had locked me up, that would’ve been a betrayal.

• If Daniel had assisted others in locking me up, that would’ve been a worse betrayal.

• If Daniel himself had locked me up, and had been honest about his actions as he was taking them, that would’ve been an even worse betrayal.

• Daniel himself locked me up, and he was dishonest, deceitful, and manipulative in the process.

213) Defamation – Penal Code 499

• 213a) Even though the IMH’s reports against me were not shared with any unauthorized individuals, they clearly state the biases and incorrect opinions and beliefs held by the IMH’s employees pertaining to me, a topic they know very little about. These are defamatory in nature, and they were communicated to Phyllis, and others, the IMH spoke to on my behalf as professional opinions, making them incorrectly come across as credible. Hereby, in a way, these reports were shared with unauthorized individuals.

• 213b) The act of locking someone up in an Involuntary Human Alteration Facility is defamatory in nature. Not only did the people in my life look at, and treat me, differently after I had been confined, because I was now officially severely “mentally ill” in the eyes of the general public, the people around Phyllis now also saw the person she was dating differently, which impacted Phyllis’ decisions regarding me.

• 213c) After I had been labeled as “mentally ill”, the IMH was incorrectly regarded as the world’s leading authority on me. As its reports show, the IMH has created a false narrative about me, and has spread this to Phyllis, and others, and even the police. This false narrative has spread so far that, from my perspective, at certain points in time the whole world was infected with an anti-I mind-virus of sorts.

214) Attack of my beliefs – Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution

In its reports, the IMH has attacked a number of my beliefs that cannot be proven to be false as false, labeling them delusions. This is in violation of International Human Rights Laws that protect the Freedom to Believe, and Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution.

215) Sleep Deprivation – International Human Rights Laws (UNCAT & Geneva Conventions)

On July 19^th 2024, July 20^th 2024, July 21^st 2024, July 22^nd 2024, November 26^th 2024, and April 26^th 2025, the IMH’s torture deprived me of sleep, which is in violation of international human rights laws (UNCAT and Geneva Conventions).

216) Torture

• 216a) I was undeniably tortured from July 19^th 2024 to July 22^nd 2024. Again on November 25^th 2024 and November 26^th 2024. And again on the night of April 26^th 2024. I can further argue that every single day of my confinements constitute torture.

• 216b) One could quote various penal codes such as 321, 322, 339, 340, 349, and 351, but what is the point. Anyone who looks at CCTV footage of these acts will immediately understand that they are wrong, especially those on November 25^th and November 26^th 2024. There is no need for penal codes.

• 216c) Although I understand that the nurses were in a way just doing their jobs and following orders, and it may have been hard for them to speak up considering group pressure and the fear of losing their jobs and livelihoods, these crimes NEED to be investigated by the AGC.

• 216d) Albeit not the worst, arguably the most disgusting torture tactic used by the IMH was blocking me from reaching Phyllis via the ward phone from November 25^th to November 27^th, at the exact same time it was physically torturing me to get me to swallow psychiatric drugs. In essence, the IMH cut me off from the only emotional connection I had ever had to get me to swallow its pills.

217) Violation of the law that states that doctors have to do their bests to act in the best interests of their patients.

Although the IMH’s psychiatrists are not doctors, they were considered to be by law, and therefore by law had to do their bests to act in my best interest. The IMH’s psychiatrists never acted in my best interest. The IMH has already admitted to breaking this law in its reports, in which it states that it’s of the opinion that its confinements of me were in Phyllis’ best interest, not in my best interest.

218) Violation of the law that gives patients the right to refuse healthcare.

Although what goes on in the IMH does not constitute healthcare, it is considered to be by law, and so IMH personnel broke the law by violating my right to refuse healthcare. Even though I am a victim, the law considered me to be a patient during my confinements, which gave me the right to refuse “treatment”.

219) Endangerment of Phyllis’ life - Penal Code 336

219a) Although IMH nurses did not have access to the same information as I during the first days of my 3^rd confinement, by ignoring me when I told them about Phyllis’ suicidality and my concerns for her life, they put Phyllis’ life in danger.

219b) The IMH attempts to eliminate “mind diseases”, and it has stated that concern for Phyllis’ life is (part of) a “mind disease”. As such, the IMH has stated that it is attempting to eliminate concern for Phyllis’ life, and it, at a minimum, has admitted to endangering Phyllis’ life, but attempting to eliminate concern for the life of a suicidal person, is really more aptly referred to as attempted murder.

How the IMH’s actions have impacted me

220) Destruction of my relationship with Phyllis

• 220a) The IMH has altered me, and it has interfered in and destroyed my relationship with Phyllis, the only person with whom I’ve ever had an emotional connection, causing our 3+ year relationship to fall apart.

• 220b) I cannot express in words how this has impacted me, nor does compensation for this exist.

• 220c) Offering me all the money in the world as compensation would only be an insult to me, and only serve to enrage me further. It’d prove to me that you are an imbecile incapable of understanding what truly matters in life.

221) Phyllis treats me as though I hate her, and the world no longer makes any sense. I may have been destroyed to the point that I am now incapable of love.

• 221a) I treated Phyllis well for over three years.

• 221b) We had a strong relationship in mid-2024.

• 221c) Phyllis showed this by deciding to confide in me, and me alone, that she had been suicidal for a year and a half on May 17^th 2024.

• 221d) After this, I made Phyllis’ life and well-being my sole focus, and I did my absolute utmost to save her life and be there for her.

• 221e) Although I was not my normal self anymore after I was released from the IMH in August 2024, from my perspective, I did not do anything that caused our relationship to fall apart in August and September 2024.

• 221f) Our relationship then further deteriorated each and every time the IMH confined me and altered me. The worst I did was be affected by the IMH’s actions and be an emotional mess in the aftermath of each confinement.

• 221g) Phyllis is the primary beneficiary of my will, and, as of this writing, she’d get ~SGD20M if I were to die.

• 221h) I transferred Phyllis ~SGD650k throughout 2025. I have more money than I need, and I intend to, over time, transfer her enough money so that she doesn’t have to work anymore.

In spite of the above, Phyllis treats me as though I hate her:

• 221i) On May 5^th 2025, Phyllis, whom I know still cared about me, left my apartment without saying anything, shortly after I had burst down crying louder than I had ever cried before. This makes no sense.

• 221j) Phyllis has blocked me on texting apps, email, and Mobile Legends Bang Bang. Before blocking me on MLBB, she hid her match history from me on Dec 29^th 2025, in response to I transferring her SGD100k. This also makes no sense. This makes it look like I hate Phyllis, at the same time it proved to me that she loves me. If she had hated me, instead of hiding her match history, she’d have played MLBB between 4-7AM more often in an attempt to get more money out of me.

• 221k) The IMH has told the world that our relationship is one-sided. Although this may now be true as a result of the IMH’s actions, it’s wrong about the way in which it is one-sided. Phyllis is the one who loves me, whereas it appears as though I hate Phyllis.

• 221l) I no longer have any way of communicating with Phyllis, not even about administrative matters, such as asking her to get a safety deposit box in which she can keep my will safe, or asking her to tell me more about her financial needs.

• 221m) When I approached Phyllis, on March 12^th 2026 at Mercylight, about she providing evidence for the previous lawsuit, Phyllis immediately said she was going to call the police, and she showed me her phone that had dialed 999.

• 221n) And of course, Phyllis has, over time, chosen to have less and less contact with me, without any identifiable reasons why, other than the IMH having destroyed me, and (thereby?) our relationship.

• 221o) Has the IMH destroyed me to the point that I am no longer capable of love?

Conclusion:

• 221p) Although it’s possible that I have done bad things to Phyllis of which I am unaware, and that I have caused Phyllis to treat me like this, Phyllis’ treatment of me is all-but-certain to be a result of the IMH’s relationship interference and destruction.

• 221q) Phyllis’ mother cutting off financial support and kicking her out of the house in response to finding out about my existence, and Phyllis’ colleagues and others around her being under the delusion that I was severely “mentally ill”, didn’t help either.

Impact on me:

• 221r) Being treated like I hate the person who loves me the most, by the person who loves me the most, makes zero sense, unless I am simply incapable of love, in which case, what is the point of me? Neither the immense pain as a result of all this, nor how this has destroyed me on the inside, can be put into words or compensated for.

222) I was made to commit a crime against Phyllis.

• 222a) After Phyllis had shared about her suicidality with me, and me alone, I did my absolute best to respect her boundaries, and to not share this about her without her consent.

• 222b) I did not share this with Dalilah, nor with any of the people in my life.

• 222c) After the police had started investigating me, and after the IMH had confined and tortured me for three weeks, I was left with no choice but to commit a crime against Phyllis, by violating her boundaries by sharing with others about her suicidality without her consent.

• 222d) This was the only choice I had. There was no other way to explain my actions to others who now believed I was a severely mentally ill criminal.

• 222e) Over time, I’ve been forced to share Phyllis’ deepest secret with more and more others without her consent. Which now includes the general public through this lawsuit.

• 222f) The fact that the world has forced me to betray Phyllis’ trust and violate her unspoken boundary, by forcing me to share with it something that Phyllis entrusted me, and me alone, with, is something I will never forgive the world for.

• 222g) From my perspective, this is the 2^nd worst crime I’m guilty of having committed against Phyllis.

223) Loss of other relationships

• 223a) Other than my relationship with Phyllis, all but one of my other relationships also fell apart between July 2024 and May 2025.

• 223b) Some people, whom I had considered friends, showed their true colors in my time of need, and so I kicked them out of my life.

• 223c) But there were also many good relationships that fell apart. Most of these fell apart as a result of the friends now believing I was very mentally ill as a result of the IMH’s actions, and treating me differently because of it.

• 223d) These friends were either incapable of understanding, or refused to understand, what had been done to me, believing psychiatrists and Involuntary Human Alteration Facilities make people better.

• 223e) Furthermore, I have an incredibly hard time relating to anyone these days, because no human being is capable of understanding any of the things that I’ve been through, only some of which I have put in this SoC, because most of my inexplicable, dare I say supernatural, experiences are too much for others to handle.

• 223f) Because of this, and because of how I’ve been treated, I no longer feel human. COVID, Cancer, and AIDS, all wrapped up into 1 human form, would not have been hated as much as, or treated as poorly as, I have been.

• 223g) Compensation for these does not exist.

224) Severe Suffering

• 224a) To say that I suffered severely during my confinements, while numerous inhumane acts were performed on me, would still be a humongous understatement.

• 224b) If I were to be sent back in time to before each of my IMH confinements with a gun in my pocket, I would blow my brains out without hesitation each and every time.

• 224c) I would rather spend my life in prison than three weeks in the IMH.

• 224d) Furthermore, I would rather nothing exist at all than anything exist that includes even the faintest, remotest possibility of what I experienced the night of April 26^th 2025.

• 224e) Compensation for having had to go through these experiences does not exist. Neither real nor imaginary.

225) Destruction of Person and Life

The person I had spent 35 years working on becoming was murdered. The life I had spent 35 years building was destroyed. Compensations for these do not exist.

226) Time & energy spent and pain endured while healing.

In the wake of every confinement, I had to invest significant time and energy to heal myself to the extent that it was possible, and I endured a lot of pain while I attempted to cope with what had been done to me, and with how my life had been irreparably destroyed. My best guess is that I’ll spend the remainder of my life attempting to heal from what the IMH has done to me. Compensation for this does not exist.

227) Suicidality

The IMH’s actions pushed me to the edge of suicide, almost costing me my life, not to mention the intense suffering and fears associated with suicidal feelings and ideation. Compensation for this does not exist.

228) …..

• 228a) In my eyes, I was confined, tortured, raped, mutilated, and altered as a person, because I did my best to protect the one who loves me the most on July 18th 2024, because I rang someone’s doorbell on November 21st 2024, and because I cried in public on April 17th 2025.

• 228b) If these actions lead to the things that were done to me, for one, what can I still do that is not going to cause the world to confine, torture, rape, mutilate, and alter me? I don’t even feel safe in my own apartment anymore, because if crying in public is a crime, then who’s to say staying in one’s apartment isn’t?

• 228c) In my eyes, the police can break into my apartment at any moment, and lock me up in the IMH again just because. To me it appears that the police and the IMH do not need a valid reason to do so.

• 228d) After all, one third party’s thoughts that Phyllis was in danger, and the police’s seemingly predetermined conclusion that, not only it was true, but that I was the cause of it, was enough to lock me up in jail for a night, and for I to be altered throughout a three week long confinement.

• 228e) And the opinion of one, or a few, individuals wearing police uniforms that I was “of unsound mind” was enough to physically assault me, abduct me, and hold me captive cut off from the outside world for three weeks, during which I was tortured and altered.

• 228f) I will never be able to feel safe anywhere in the world ever again, especially not while mental health laws and Involuntary Human Alteration Facilities continue to exist.

• 228g) These days, the only reason for which I leave my apartment is to attempt to reduce the suffering of others, may of whom I know are suffering daily at the hands of psychiatrists worldwide.

229) A decade of self-work was undone. I can’t feel anything anymore.

I like being able to feel things. I spent a decade (from 2014 to 2024) figuring out how to heal from my severe childhood traumas and how to feel something, anything. The last three years of it, it was essentially my full-time occupation. The IMH has undone all of this. I don’t feel much of anything anymore, except for terrible things when I sit down and focus on myself.

In summary

230) On July 18^th 2024, I was doing my best to care for, and save the life of, Phyllis, who was suicidal. Others came in between us, in spite of having no idea what was going on, and separated us based on outrageous assumptions. The only information the police had in its possession was the single account of a 3^rd party, whom I had informed for a second time the day before that I was worried about Phyllis. After doing my best to save Phyllis’ life, the police began investigating me, and I was locked up in the IMH for three weeks during which I was tortured, and during which my brain was rewired without any evidence, let alone proof, that there was anything wrong it. The IMH has stated that this was done for Phyllis because I was a danger to her, and that this made me less dangerous to Phyllis.

231) After I rang Phyllis’ doorbell in the morning on November 21^st 2024, Daniel decided to reverse a legal promise he had made to me and used lies, deceit, pressure tactics, and emotional manipulation to get me confined to the IMH for a second time. I was again tortured, this time with the clear intent to make me swallow psychiatric drugs. My brain was rewired a 2^nd time without any evidence, let alone proof, that there was anything wrong it. The IMH has stated that this was done primarily for Phyllis because I was a danger to her, and that this made me less dangerous to Phyllis.

232) After crying in public on April 17^th 2025, I was physically assaulted by six individuals, four of whom wore police uniforms. Two of the individuals wearing police uniforms abducted me and brought me to the IMH, where I was locked up for three weeks completely cut off from the outside world. I was again tortured, and my brain was again rewired without any evidence, let alone proof, that there was anything wrong with it. The IMH has stated that this was done primarily for Phyllis because I was a danger to her, and that this made me less dangerous to Phyllis.

An even simpler summary

233) I was confined, tortured, and altered three times, and the person who loves me the most was told to cut me off. And all I’ve been told is that Nisha, a person who maybe was in the same room as me for 15 minutes, says that the reason for all of this was that I was a danger to the person I care most about.

Appendix A – Report #1

Appendix B – Report #2

Appendix C – Letter to the IMH

Not-dear-in-any-way-shape-or-form the IMH,

I don’t know why I’m writing a letter to something that isn’t alive, doesn’t have relationships, and doesn’t have feelings, but I digress.

I have you by your figurative balls.

You made me and my relationships your business, even though we are none of it.

You don’t seem to understand that I have lived and experienced all 300,000+ hours of my own life, whereas you have experienced 0 of them, and that, other than Phyllis, you only have a few irrelevant 3^rd party accounts of individuals whom hate me, and observations of your staff while I was confined and the object of severe human rights violations.

No being, with at least a single brain cell or an ounce of empathy, is going to believe your words over mine when it comes to the topic of me.

THERE IS NO WAY FOR YOU TO “WIN” OR DEFEND YOURSELF IN THIS LAWSUIT. GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK NON-EXISTENT SKULL.

Even when it comes to my relationships, are you really so delusional that you believe Phyllis is going to take the side of an entity that has:

• Tortured the person she referred to as her “#1 source of comfort”.

• Destroyed her relationship with that person.

• Done everything else you to did her directly, as well as indirectly through me.

• Stated that all of this was done for her (protection).

If I want, I can start telling people what you did to me, and ask them whether they were hurt by hearing my story. Anyone who is hurt by my story can join the lawsuit and claim that you hurt them via hurting me. Unless the Supreme Court is going to deny the existence of empathy, in theory every human being can join as a plaintiff and claim monetary compensation for you having hurt them by having hurt me.

Either way, PLEASE, for the love of all that’s holy, STOP CONFINING AND REWIRING THE BRAINS OF SINGAPORE CITIZENS AGAINST THEIR WILLS.

The question here is whether you and your employees are criminals, or whether you and your employees are so unbelievably dumb that you believe that you’re helping people who suffer emotionally, by confining them and altering their brains against their wills, without even a single piece of evidence that there is anything wrong with their brains.

Cease to exist,

Frank

Appendix D – Letter to the MoH’s employees

MoH Employees,

The IMH is harming the health of Singapore citizens behind your backs.

I apologize for dragging your employer, and thereby you, into this lawsuit, but I had to make you aware of this extremely urgent and serious matter relevant to your stated mission:

• Promote good health and reduce illness

• Ensure access to good and affordable healthcare

• Pursue medical excellence

I hope that you can understand that the IMH is working against the MoH’s mission statement. It increases illness, and none of its actions can be referred to as medical excellence, or even anything medical.

The IMH is rewiring the brains of Singapore citizens, without so much as a single piece of evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with their brains. The IMH’s psychiatrists are “playing doctor” on Singapore citizens who are suffering emotionally.

I am not seeking anything from the MoH, other than that you, as its employees, do your bests to protect the health of Singapore citizens, which at this point in time requires you to take appropriate measures to protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry.

Please spread awareness to colleagues whom you believe can make a difference, and whom you believe have the power to take steps that protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry.

Kind regards,

Frank

P.S. If you want the MoH to be removed as a defendant in this lawsuit, all you have to do is email me.

Appendix E – Letter to the AGC’s employees

AGC employees,

As I’ve laid out in this SoC, the IMH is a criminal enterprise in violation of:

• International Human Rights Laws

• Singapore’s Constitution

• Numerous other laws in Singapore

I will continue this civil lawsuit against the IMH until sufficient measures have been taken to protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry, as outlined in “The Truth About Psychiatry”.

However, I believe that the severity of the crimes committed by IMH employees warrant at least an investigation, and likely criminal prosecution. But you, as employees at the AGC, have a far better view of that than I do.

Furthermore, I don’t just believe, but I know that Daniel Rouquette needs to be criminally prosecuted for what he did to me on November 21^st 2024. I’m not an expert on the law, but I’m quite sure he violated Penal Code 340 – Cheating. And if what he did that day (reversing a legal promise to me in a despicable way) were to not come along with negative consequences, there would clearly be something wrong with the world.

Please investigate this matter and take the steps you deem appropriate.

Kind regards,

Frank

P.S. If you want the AGC to be removed as a defendant in this lawsuit, all you have to do is email me.

Appendix F – Letter to Lawrence

Lawrence,

I hope you agree with me that what psychiatry is doing to Singapore citizens through primarily the IMH, but also through private psychiatrists, is the most important issue in Singapore today, and that it needs to urgently be dealt with, in order to protect Singapore citizens from further harm being done to them by psychiatry.

I apologize for forcing you to spend, what I can only imagine, are multiple hours reading through this SoC and “The Truth About Psychiatry”, but I believe this is currently the most important issue to Singapore citizens, and here’s why:

Imagine you are the head a small 5-person family, and you and 3 of them want to use the family car to go to the beach on a sunny Sunday. However, 1 member of your family has cancer and needs to go to the hospital for chemotherapy. Are you going to use the family car to bring your family member with cancer to the hospital, or are you going to take everyone to the beach?

Now imagine you have a 3.66M-person family. All but a thousand of them want you to do one thing, but a thousand of them DESPERATELY NEED you to do another thing. What will you do?

This is a problem present in many aspects of today’s society, including capitalism, but also democracy. The majority should not always rule by default.

I suspect that a large portion of Singapore citizens don’t mind the IMH, or even are in support of the IMH, because many human beings find people who suffer emotionally annoying and would prefer not to be reminded that it’s possible to have a shitty life.

However, the right thing to do is to prioritise the individuals most in need, and so I ask of you to prioritize the Singapore citizens who are suffering the most, which, from my perspective, are the hundreds that are confined to the IMH as you are reading this, and whose brains are going to be rewired tonight, again tomorrow morning, and again every night and morning thereafter until someone puts an end to this madness.

Now that you’ve been made aware of what’s going on, I beg of you to act. If you don’t, I’ll consider suing you for Misconduct in Public Office, or something along those lines, because I believe that that’d be the right thing to do, but if it comes to that, I fear that it won’t go well for me.

If you do act, I thank you.

Kind regards,

Frank

P.S. I don’t know whether you personally care about GDP, but is there any way you can stop the Singapore government from giving a crap about GDP? If you think GDP matters in any way, here are some thoughts for you:

Imagine you, as Minister of Finance, announce a 10:1 currency split tomorrow:

• Every Singapore citizen gets an additional zero added to its bank account.

• New coins and notes go into production with 10x the value of current coins and notes.

• Every current coin and note is now worth 10x, in spite of what the numbers on the coins and notes say.

Prices in Singapore will immediately go up 10x and so will GDP. Singapore has just achieved a 900% increase in GDP overnight. Singapore can do this every month and achieve yearly GDP growth of ~100,000,000,000,000%.

Amazing, right? Nah… all it’d do is confuse the hell out of everyone, and waste resources on designing new coins and notes every month.

Singapore’s GDP is an indicator of things, that in their turns are indicators of more things, that in their turns are indicators of even more things, that hopefully eventually say something about the actual well-being of Singapore citizens.

Appendix G – Letter to Ye Kung

Ye Kung,

I hope that you agree with me that psychiatry is the #1 threat to the health of Singapore citizens.

I apologize to you as well for forcing you to spend hours reading through this lengthy SoC. However, I deem this issue too important to the health of Singapore citizens not to inform you directly of it.

I delivered a letter to the MoH with my “The Truth About Psychiatry” affidavit attached on March 18^th, which I was told by the man in mail room, on the 2^nd floor I think it was, would be delivered to “the registry”, but I have not heard anything back.

I worry that, unless I deliver this to your personally as a defendant in this lawsuit, it might not be brought to your attention.

I think my 41-page affidavit proves, as much as anything can be proven, that psychiatry is an enemy of mankind. If for some reason you disagree, or would like to discuss any part of the affidavit, I’m open to discussing it with you personally.

Having been made aware of what psychiatry really is, as long as you, as leader of the MoH, ensure that steps are taken towards protecting Singapore citizens from it, I will not seek anything from you, and I will drop you as a defendant in this lawsuit once I am satisfied with the measures that have been taken.

If you do not act, I may sue you for Misconduct in Public Office, because, from my perspective, that’d be the right thing to do.

If you do act, I thank you.

Please do your best to protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry.

Kind regards,

Frank

Appendix H – Letter to Lucien

Lucien,

I have no doubt that you understand Singapore’s laws far far better than I do. However, I fear that you are unaware of what’s going on at the IMH.

Google tells me that intent must generally be proven for it to be possible to establish a crime. I do not know how one can prove intent, because in my figurative mind one can always claim to have been incredibly dumb, and claim to not have been aware of the reasons for, and/or the causes of, one’s acts.

For example, a person shooting another person with a gun can claim it wasn’t aware that pulling the trigger would cause a chain reaction, causing a piece of metal to go into the person’s head. And/or the shooter can claim that it thought that a piece of metal in one’s skull would be a pleasant experience. Such a person would objectively be incredibly dumb, but I don’t see how it can be proven that the person is lying. The person could, in theory, be telling the truth.

I see the IMH and many of its employees the same. Some of the IMH’s statements, that were published in its reports, either indicate IMH employees are among the dumbest in the world, or criminals. The worst examples:

• Phyllis being my “love interest”.

• I being a danger to Phyllis.

• The IMH talking to Phyllis about she setting boundaries with me and applying for a restraining order against me.

• Concern for Phyllis’ life being included as essentially a “symptom” in a supposed medical report.

• The IMH’s assessment of me in Apr/May 2025 having been partly based on corroborative accounts from people whom had had zero contact with me for months, and whom had barely had any contact with me for years.

Either IMH employees were so awfully unaware of the meaning of their words, what they imply, and that they had no evidence to support them, that they’re incredibly dumb. Or what I guess is probably more likely is that they put intentionally false statements about me in these “reports”, in order to be able to justify their actions against me in hindsight.

I find the latter, that the IMH employees were aware of what they were doing to me, impossible to believe, but I also believe that I am in denial that human beings are capable of acts as evil as the ones that were done to me. I don’t know which one I believe more. I think I lean towards the latter being more likely.

Either way, I ask that you, as the head of the AGC, make sure that these crimes, and the crimes that are being committed by the IMH against others in Singapore every single day, are at least investigated, and that the individuals responsible for these crimes, if proven guilty, are brought to justice, to the extent that that is possible.

Last but not least, I ask you to make sure that Daniel is also investigated and prosecuted. He is the only individual I’ve ever met whom I know needs to be prosecuted. There is absolutely no way that he can claim to have been so dumb that he didn’t know what he was doing on November 21^st 2024. Daniel knew what he was doing as he was doing it.

I hope that you will consider everything in this SoC and take action.

If you want to be dropped from this lawsuit, all you have to do is send me an email and ask, or file for a strike-out application, which I won’t contest.

I only thought this matter important enough that the head of the AGC should be made aware of it. If you deem that I have wasted your time, I apologize. Send me an email, and I’ll compensate you up to SGD10k for having wasted your time, or alternatively I can send it to the IRAS / the AGC for having wasted Singapore’s Attorney-General’s time, depending on which you determine best.

Kind regards,

Frank

P.S. You may not be the right person to talk to about this, but there is a logical fallacy in Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution. It states:

Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion and to propagate it.

The first half is in conflict with the second half. The first:

Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion

essentially states:

Every person is free to hold, talk about and act in accordance with its own beliefs

The second half:

and to propagate it.

essentially states:

Ever person is free to spread its beliefs

An issue arises when two persons with different beliefs meet. Freedom to spread your beliefs essentially means freedom to make others believe what you belief. This encroaches upon the rights of people to hold onto their own beliefs.

As such, there is a logical fallacy in Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution. A person cannot be free to hold onto its own beliefs at the same time as others are free to make it believe what they believe.

I believe that Article 15 of Singapore’s Constitution should be changed to:

Every person/individual is free to hold whatever beliefs it wants to, and is free to share them within reason.

Appendix I – Letter to Phyllis

Phyllis,

You can do anything you want to do. No matter what you do, you will always love me.

I will always be there for you to the best of my ability. But I think you already know that.

Although you can literally do anything you want to do, within this lawsuit you are required to choose between the following options:

1. Join me as a plaintiff
   You can join me as a plaintiff in this lawsuit and sue the IMH with me. You can very credibly claim that the IMH has hurt you severely. I have no doubt that you could get an amount well in excess of SGD10M, considering the IMH’s actions and words against you.
   However, if you want to join this lawsuit as a plaintiff, I ask you not to sue for money. The things done to us cannot be compensated for with money, and so asking for money would send the wrong signal. It’d tell the world that it’s okay to do these things to human beings, as long as you give them money afterwards. And it’d come out of the pockets of all Singapore citizens, most of whom have not hurt us.
   Furthermore, I know I once told you that you’ll always at least be the second most important person to me. I now know that no one will ever be more important to me than you are. I have more than enough money for the both of us. Even if you choose to have little or no contact with me, I will nonetheless take care of you financially. You’ll never have to worry about money.

2. Stay as a passive defendant
   You can choose to stay as a passive defendant and stay up-to-date with the proceedings. There will be zero consequences for you. I am not seeking for anything from you, other than what you want to give me. But I suggest you choose option #1 or option #3.

3. Become a witness
   You, Phyllis, can easily stop being a defendant in this lawsuit. There are two ways in which you can do so:
   1) Hire a lawyer. The lawyer will file for a strike-out application, removing you as a defendant, which I won’t contest.
   2) Ask me face-to-face to remove you as a defendant. If you ask me to do something face-to-face, there aren’t a lot of things I’m going to say no to, and this certainly isn’t one of those.
   If you choose this path, I please ask that you choose option #2 for me.
   However, whether you will have to provide evidence in this lawsuit is out of your control. I really don’t want to put you on the stand and force you to answer emotionally challenging questions for hours, but if the IMH continues its crimes against Singapore citizens, I will have to. I apologize in advance if it gets to that.
   I hope that the MoH, the AGC, Lawrence, Ye Kung, and/or Lucien step in, but there is a chance that the IMH will decide to drag this out to trial. But I hope that that won’t happen, because it’ll mean thousands more Singapore citizens will suffer directly at the IMH’s hands.
   Furthermore, I also need to know that you understand what has been done to you / us. If you had died in 2024, and I had been told that you had killed yourself, but in reality someone had murdered you, I would’ve wanted to know the truth.

I wish you the best, because you are the best.

Frank

Appendix J – Letter to Charmaine

Charmaine,

Within this lawsuit, you have choices similar to Phyllis’:

1. Join as a plaintiff
   I know that you care about me. That is enough to be a plaintiff in this lawsuit. Someone you care about having been the victim of these horrendous acts is more than enough to be entitled to compensation.
   You probably won’t be able to get anywhere close to as large an amount as Phyllis, but I reckon you could claim tens of thousands, perhaps SGD100k, especially because I all but know that there are connections between what the IMH did to me, and the fact that we no longer talk.
   However, just like Phyllis, I advise you not to send the wrong signal that money can compensate for these evil acts. And, just like Phyllis, I intend to, over time, make it so that you don’t have to work. But if you consent to that, I need your banking details.
   I reckon you’ll probably say that “this is a lot”, because you told me “that’s a lot” when I said I was willing to fly to HK to meet you again, and I think on a few other occasions.
   I get the feeling that you don’t think you deserve love after what the man you met before me did to you, but in my opinion you do. You are amazing.

2. Stay as a passive defendant
   You can choose to stay as a passive defendant as a way to stay up-to-date with proceedings, but I recommend you choose option #1 or option #3.

3. Become a witness
   You can decide to remove yourself as a defendant, but I’ll likely call upon you as a witness to share your perspective with the court, if it goes to trial, because you’re one of only four people I trust to tell the truth about me.
   These are your paths to becoming a witness:
   1) Hire a lawyer to file a strike-out application removing you as a defendant. I will not contest it. If you ask me to reimburse your legal fees, I might miscalculate a little.
   2) Send me a txt or email me. I’ll remove you as a defendant no questions asked.

Frank

Appendix K – Letter to Laura

Laura,

Within this lawsuit, you have almost the same choices as Charmaine, with the footnote that, if it goes to trial, you can easily come to the trial in person at the Singapore Supreme Court as a member of the public:

1. Join as a plaintiff
   You have checked all my Telegram stories since I started posting them in late 2024. You also sent me that text via a colleague of yours in March/April 2025, which gave me a ton of strength during my 3^rd confinement. These are more than enough proof that you care about me, and so you too can claim for monetary compensation. Likely a smaller amount similar to Charmaine in the tens of thousands.
   However, I’ll say the same to you. Asking for money in compensation for these acts would send the wrong signal. And most importantly, you will always have a special place in my heart, and I also intend to, over time, make it so that you don’t have to work anymore.
   I get the sense that you quite enjoy your job, but maybe you could hold your company hostage with your skill set (you selected my resume from, what I suspect was/is, an enormous stack of applications after all ;) ), and demand to be allowed to work lesser hours.

2. Stay as a passive defendant
   You too can stay as a passive defendant to stay up-to-date with the proceedings, because I am not seeking anything from you either, but I recommend you choose option #1 or option #3.

3. Become a witness
   Just like Charmaine, you are one of four individuals I trust to speak truthfully about me, and so I will likely call upon you as a witness to share your perspective, if this case goes to trial.
   If you want to become a witness, here are the ways in which you can do so:
   1) Hire a lawyer to file for a strike-out application, removing you as a defendant. I will not contest it. If you ask me to reimburse your legal fees, be warned that I might add a zero.
   2) Send me a txt or email me. I’ll remove you as a defendant no questions asked.

Frank

Appendix L – Letter to Lynette

Lynette,

Within this lawsuit, your choices are pretty much the same as Charmaine’s and Laura’s:

1. Join as a plaintiff
   I know you care about me a lot. You saved my life after all. You can easily join as a plaintiff in this lawsuit and claim significant compensation from the IMH, likely 6 figures, considering we were a lot closer than Charmaine and I, and Laura and I were. Furthermore, I can only assume that my, at-times negative, vibes, as a result of what the IMH had done to me, directly impacted you during your yoga classes that I attended.
   However, I also ask the same of you, which is to join as a plaintiff-in-spirit if you choose to join as a plaintiff, because asking for monetary compensation would send the wrong signal. I don’t know if your religion has a concept similar to karma, but that’s what I suggest leaving it up to.
   Furthermore, irrespective of you being married, I’d like to, over time, make it so that you also have the option of not working if you don’t want to. If you want to take me up on this offer, I’ll need your banking details though.

2. Stay as a passive defendant
   You also have the option of staying as a passive defendant to stay up-to-date with court proceedings, but I suggest you choose option #1 or option #3.

3. Become a witness
   If this lawsuit progresses to trial, I intend to call upon you as a witness, even more so than I intend to call upon Charmaine and Laura.
   Not only are you one of only four whom I trust to tell the truth about me, you saw me quite frequently as all of this transpired, and so you have a really good perspective of what my emotional state was like throughout all of this. Between August 2024 and May 2025, I saw you more consistently than I saw anyone.
   These are your options to become a witness:
   1) Hire a lawyer to file a strike-out application, removing you as a defendant. I won’t contest it. If you ask me to reimburse your legal fees, I may send a multiple of the sum.
   2) Send me a txt or email me. I’ll remove you as a defendant no questions asked.

At this point in time, I cannot thank you for having saved my life, because I don’t feel any gratitude for being alive. However, I have no doubt that you, Laura, Charmaine, and Phyllis, care about me, and so I believe you yourself, as well as the three of them, are immensely grateful to you for having saved me.

Frank

Appendix M – Letter to All

Look,

I’m a pretty reasonable person. If you treat me nicely, I treat you nicely. If you treat me badly, I return the favor. I’m still objectively treating the IMH MUCH nicer than it has me. I have not confined, tortured, or rewired the brain of, the IMH yet.

I don’t just sue people for no reason, but it’s gotten to a point where no one will even listen to anything I say anymore, because the IMH has told the world that I’m delusional.

Furthermore, the IMH is not reasonable at all. Its lawyers have thus far:

1. Attempted to financially manipulate me.

2. Emotionally abused me.

3. Delayed and slowed things down.

I hope that this SoC makes it very clear that the IMH is beyond unreasonable. Everything under “chronological account of events” I experienced. There is not a single lie, and everything is as true and accurate as I am able to present it.

I personally don’t understand why anyone would ever lie. Just like I can’t fathom why anyone would ever hurt anyone. What’s the fucking point. My soul has been shattered knowing that there are human beings capable of such acts as the ones that I have been the object of.

To anyone who still doubts that changes NEED to be made after having read through this entire Statement of Claim and “The Truth About Psychiatry”: I don’t what’s wrong with you, but there is something very very wrong with you.

Worldwide, almost 10M human beings are confined to Involuntary Human Alteration Facilities each and every year. I don’t know about every single one of them, but most of them have their brains rewired without any evidence, let alone proof, that there is anything wrong with their brains.

Get it through your heads that psychiatrists are not doctors. Just like most people who author a book present themselves as experts on the topic to make money, so do psychiatrists. These people have no fucking clue about any form of well-being. They lock up human beings, restrain them, torture them, and rewire their brains, thereby altering them, which in many cases equates to murdering them on the inside. Such acts don’t help anyone. And it’s hard to believe that psychiatrists are so unaware that they don’t understand what they’re doing to their victims.

I don’t know what else to say other than: STOP THIS NOW!

I’d storm every Involuntary Human Alteration Facility in the world by myself and set the victims free, but if I did that, somehow I’d be seen as the crazy one, even though psychiatrists and individuals that support the existence of these facilities are objectively the crazy ones.

I’ve been posting some on X recently, and it seems to me as though a lot of people fall into one of these three camps:

1. Some people have never really suffered much, and so they have no clue what they’re talking about when they talk about what they refer to as “mental health”.

2. Aware or unaware, a lot of people find human beings who suffer emotionally, and/or are homeless and such, very annoying. It appears as though these people want to live in a bubble and delude themselves that everything is better than ever in the world, so when they see someone for whom things are not okay, on a subconscious level they become aware that not everything is okay, and so they just want these suffering individuals out of their sights. As such, they support locking up people who suffer out of sight.

3. Many people truly want to help and can empathize to some extent, but the world has no clue about emotional well-being and has been deluded by psychiatry, and so these people think they’re helping, but really they’re not, because the way they’ve been taught to help others doesn’t actually help anyone.

I’m not joking when I say that I know that I’ve suffered more and more deeply than any human being ever and that it’s not even remotely close. I’ve experienced things the existence of which would frighten most individuals to the extent that they’d never recover.

So please, at least take my words seriously, especially those in my 41-page affidavit “The Truth About Psychiatry”, and consider them. If you are able to use logic and reasoning to explain to me why I’m wrong, I’ll change my figurative mind in a heartbeat, but if you are unable to, I will keep pushing until adequate measures have been taken to protect human beings from the most evil hoax in the history of mankind that is psychiatry.

Frank

P.S. As much as I’d personally enjoy taking this to trial, and getting the opportunity to ridicule and humiliate a bunch of psychiatrists on the stand, human beings are being made to suffer, human beings are being altered, and human lives are being destroyed. Besides, psychiatrists are (one can only assume) human beings as well.

The IMH has nothing to lose in this lawsuit. As a public institution in Singapore, the IMH’s fundamental obligation is to act in the best interest of Singapore citizens. My goal is to reduce the suffering of Singapore citizens. As such, my and the IMH’s goals should be aligned.

The IMH has hereby been made aware of the fact that its current existence is to the detriment of Singapore citizens. The IMH needs to attempt to change, or choose to cease to exist if its flaws turn out to be fundamental that they cannot be fixed.

Fighting against this lawsuit is fighting to enable the confinement, torture, and alteration of, Singapore citizens.

Appendix N – My 41-page affidavit titled “The Truth About Psychiatry”, outlining how psychiatry is harming human beings, and why it is the most evil hoax in the history of mankind

IN THE GENERAL DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

Writ of Summons

Case No. HC/OC 122/2026

Between

Frank Lee, formerly known as Frank Christiaan Peelen

(FIN No. REDACTED)

Claimant

And

Institute of Mental Health Singapore (IMH for short)

(UEN 201940371M)

Defendant

And

Daniel Pierre Noel Henri Rouquette

(NRIC No. S8787780I)

Defendant

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SUMMONS FOR INJUNCTION AGAINST IMH

I, Frank Lee (Fin No. REDACTED) of REDACTED, affirm and state as follows:

1. I am the Plaintiff in this action.

2. Where the facts set out in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge, they are true. Where they are not within my personal knowledge, they are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

Introduction

Dear Human Being,

I assume that if you are reading this, you are a human being. Possibly one employed by the Singapore Supreme Court who will have the tough job of making a decision on this summons for an injunction, which may be the most complex request for an injunction in the history of the Singapore Supreme Court.

Or perhaps a human being employed by or contracted by the Institute of Mental Health Singapore, or perhaps even someone working for Singapore’s Ministry of Health.

Whoever you are, I understand that what I’ve laid out in this long affidavit goes against the “wisdom of the crowd” and society’s beliefs, but I ask that you please consider my words, logic, and reasoning for their merits, and keep in mind that nothing is more important than the well-being of individual human beings. I promise you that everything in this affidavit is true and accurate to the absolute best of my knowledge and ability.

My core statement, which I’ve articulated over the following almost 40 pages, is that psychiatry is harming human beings. And in the case of Singapore, Singapore citizens.

As for the guidelines laid out in the Practice Directions of the Singapore Supreme Court under Point 73 (1):

1. This application is taken out without notice due to extreme urgency. Every moment that passes, additional Singapore citizens are harmed.

2. Same as a).

3. The factual basis is laid out over the following 39 pages.

4. I believe a reasonable defence does not exist. But this really is not a matter of “attacking” and “defending”.

5. I do not see any issues relating to jurisdiction.

6. Although I do not have enough liquidity to put it in an escrow account, I am willing to personally commit SGD 10M to cover damages if it turns out that I am wrong. Although the “damages” we are talking about here cannot be compensated for with money.

7. The next 39 pages cover all material facts.

I will share a copy of the summons and this supporting affidavit with IMH’s solicitors, but this is really not a legal matter, but rather a matter of (in my opinion as an outsider) Singapore’s national interest, and therefore it’d be better handled directly by people at the Ministry of Health, and arguably even the Prime Minister, Lawrence Wong.

Although this may be unbelievable now, I hope that after reading through everything, you’ll agree with me that, if there’s even a 1% chance that what I’ve laid out in this document is accurate, this document needs to urgently be brought to the attention of Singapore’s Minister of Health, Ye Kung Ong.

This is especially so because this document threatens the livelihoods and senses of self-worth of a lot of IMH’s employees. This is because this document threatens their jobs and careers, and some of them may have to come to terms with having harmed human beings for years, or even decades, instead of having helped them. These are difficult things to come to terms with, and so these individuals may instinctively fight against this document, rather than assess it objectively.

Lastly, if it’d help you to know more about me and what type of person this is coming from, you can find my autobiography here:
https://franklee1111.blogspot.com/2025/05/frank-lee-autobiography.html

(Parts of this may be incredibly hard to read for some individuals. My apologies for this in advance, but these are important topics that need to be discussed.)

Mental illnesses vs mental health vs emotional well-being

What is a mental illness? Google defines it as:

“a health condition causing significant changes in thinking, feeling, mood or behavior, leading to distress and impaired daily functioning in social, work, or family life, ranging from mild issues to severe disorders like depression or anxiety, and can be managed like other medical conditions.”

I can poke holes in that and question why significant changes in thinking, feeling, mood, or behavior are a bad thing. These can be great things. I assume that psychiatrists see it as a great thing when their treatment changes a person’s thinking, feeling, mood, and/or behavior in the way that they envision for their patient. Hence, a change in thinking, feeling, mood, and/or behavior alone means nothing.

I can also ask what exactly falls under distress. Some people are comfortable and even enjoy falling out of an airplane (with a parachute), whereas to others that would mean unimaginable distress (in spite of the parachute). What qualifies as distress is different from person to person.

Daily functioning in social, work, and family life is similar. Different societies have different standards. In some cultures (Japan/Korea), someone going home from work at 7PM is considered an outrage, and others will be of the opinion that this person isn’t functioning well because it is going home so early. There are also companies and cultures in which someone going home at 7PM is considered an amazing hard-working employee. And there are also companies and cultures in which going home at 7PM will make people worry that the individual isn’t functioning well because it goes home so late.

Who is to say what is and isn’t impaired daily functioning? Everyone is allowed to set its own standards. In these examples, if a company doesn’t like the standards an employee has for itself, it can fire that employee, and/or it can improve its hiring practices.

What I really want to do is dive into what mental illnesses really are and compare them to physical illnesses.

Mental illnesses, such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder, are labels that psychiatry has come up with, similar to how modern medicine has come up with labels such as Appendicitis, to refer to an inflammation of the appendix. But whereas “Appendicitis” comes from the Latin and Greek languages, literally translates to inflammation of the appendix, the inflammation of the appendix can be visually confirmed by cutting open the patient’s body and confirming the inflamed appendix, one can dive deeper by considering that an inflammation refers to a red and swollen part of the body often due to an infection, and one can continue to dive and discuss that an infection in this context means an invasion and presence of something unnatural in the human body, such as a bacteria or a virus. One cannot do the same with “Generalized Anxiety Disorder”.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder cannot be proven to exist by cutting open someone’s body or in any other way. And if you consider what it might be, the name indicates that it may be anxiety that’s somehow a disorder. What anxiety actually is is a fear of the future, that can be considered an alarm system for potential threats, as it works in the animal world. What psychiatrists appear to want to do is to say that if someone’s anxiety goes above a certain threshold, it’s a disorder, and they want it to be their job to reduce this anxiety via drugs.

First off, who decides where that threshold lies? Some individuals, like certain professional athletes, are said to thrive under pressure and are very comfortable with high levels of anxiety, whereas other individuals can’t stand even the slightest amount of anxiety. Each individual is in the best position to decide when too much is too much for it, not psychiatrists on its behalf.

Secondly, imagine what would happen if you reduced or eliminated anxiety in an animal species, such as antelopes, so they don’t have to be so scared of lions all the time. That may sound compassionate towards the antelopes, it’s going to cause them all to die and go extinct. You just murdered an entire species.

I’m not saying psychiatrists are murdering humanity, but altering the emotions of individual human beings against their wills, is a REALLY DUMB idea. Humanity is already struggling with declining birthrates.

If you ask a medical doctor to prove to you that you have a broken bone, appendicitis, cancer, or any type of real disease or condition, it can dig down into the fundamentals and backup its diagnosis with evidence. If you ask a psychiatrist to prove to you that you have ADHD or Schizophrenia, it’ll act like it knows better than you, use complicated words, and essentially convince you that because you exhibit certain behaviors, you are ill. But what the psychiatrist is really telling you is that your behavior is unacceptable in its eyes and crossed a line. But what line?

Furthermore, many psychiatrists will not deny that what they do is manage what they see as “symptoms” rather than cure diseases. However, what they see as symptoms are human emotions, behaviors, thinking, and beliefs. These are what make humans human. If your profession is to manage and suppress these “symptoms”, your job is to suppress humans and essentially turn them into emotionless zombies.

Michael B First¹, who is an editor of the DSM-IV and DSM-V (the manual psychiatrists use to diagnose mental illnesses), has stated (in the Book of Woe by Gary Greenberg) that “these categories exist to facilitate clinician communication but have no firm basis in reality”.

I emailed Michael about this, and he responded:

• Confirming this statement.

• Stating that psychiatry has a limited understanding of how the brain works.

• Stating that in his opinion that does not invalidate the DSM.

Al Frances, the lead editor of the DSM-IV has stated something similar²:

"there is no definition of a mental disorder. It's bullshit. I mean, you just can't define it."

So, the ones who create these categories say they have no firm basis in reality, that psychiatry has a limited understanding of how the brain works, that there is no definition of a mental disorder, and that mental illness diagnoses are bullshit, but also that the categories are still valid somehow?

Another psychiatrist who’s spoken out against psychiatry is Thomas Szasz³. Many of his (negative) views on psychiatry can be found on his Wikipedia page. Here are two examples:

“Diagnoses of “mental illness” or “mental disorder” are passed off as scientific but are judgments (of disdain) to support certain uses of power by authorities.”

“Psychiatry is a pseudoscience that parodies medicine by using medical-sounding words and that, supported by various Mental Health Acts, it has become a modern secular state religion.”

Depression used to be believed to be the result of a lack of serotonin, but it has now been proven that there is no scientific evidence for this⁴:

This review suggests that the huge research effort based on the serotonin hypothesis has not produced convincing evidence of a biochemical basis to depression. This is consistent with research on many other biological markers [21]. We suggest it is time to acknowledge that the serotonin theory of depression is not empirically substantiated.

In essence, psychiatry’s theories and beliefs are assumed to be true until disproven, because psychiatrists are presumed to be scientists and doctors. Psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies make money off of these theories and beliefs. This is not how science works, nor how medicine operates. You don’t treat people, especially not against their wills, based on theories and beliefs.

The Guardian, a 200+ year old British newspaper, published an article in May of 2013⁵ questioning whether mental illnesses really exist after the DSM-V stated that shyness in children can be classified as a mental disorder.

And it’s not just shy children that psychiatry has labeled as “mentally ill”. If you’re a woman and you don’t have sexual/erotic thoughts or fantasies, psychiatrists may label you as “mentally ill” with the “Female Sexual Interest Disorder” label, as if it’s a disorder for women to not be interested in sex.

Psychiatry appears to be of the opinion that it’s not okay for women to be uninterested in sex, not okay for them to not be excited during sex, and not okay for them to say no to sexual advances, and psychiatry appears to want psychiatrists to remedy this via drugs. In what world is this considered science and medicine? In our world, unfortunately. And this isn’t some sub-sect of psychiatry, this is straight from the DSM-V-TR, the most-up-to-date manual that psychiatrists worldwide use to diagnose mental illnesses.

Let’s take a moment to ask ourselves who benefits the most from the status quo. It’s psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies. Psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry are profiting off of the suffering of human beings. Emotional suffering is real. However, there is zero scientific backing for the existence of mental illnesses. Zero. Psychiatrists convince people they have a mental illness and convince them they have to take psychiatric drugs to manage it, handing the pharmaceutical industry a new customer for life. This is the most evil hoax in the history of mankind.

If you find this hard to believe, perhaps the fact that psychiatry considers it a mental illness (Antidepressant Discontinuation Syndrome) when a patient stops taking its antidepressants may change your mind.

Where is the scientific evidence that proves that not taking your prescribed antidepressants is a mental illness with a physiological cause that can be remedied via more drugs? Psychiatry is not a science.

Even though the existence of mental illnesses is a belief that has no scientific backing, I am aware that “mental health” is the term society has chosen to refer to something that I don’t disagree exists. However, this term leaves a bad taste in my mouth for two reasons:

1. It suggests that humans have a “mind”, which I personally don’t know I agree with. Many people may, but if two people try to talk to each other about what this human “mind” entails exactly, different people will describe it differently.

2. Mental health still implies that there’s a right and a wrong, that an individual can be mentally sick, and that there can be something wrong with the way someone feels and experiences the world, which is incredibly invalidating.

Personally, I prefer to use the term “emotional well-being”, because emotions are something the existence of which I don’t think you’ll find any disagreement on within human society. I don’t think you’ll find many, if any, people disagreeing that humans experience emotions. And “well-being” is simply a nicer term to use than “health”. “Health” implies there’s a good (healthy) and bad (unhealthy), whereas “well-being” is more vague about this leaving more room for individuals to choose how they want to be, and what “well-being” means to them.

In Summary

Mental illnesses are labels psychiatry has come up with to refer to categories of behaviors, emotions, and beliefs. Neuroscience may have proven the existence of correlations between some brain activities and some emotional states, correlations do not imply causations. Psychiatry’s arbitrary categories cannot be linked to any sort of physiological cause, which is in stark contrast to real physical illnesses.

Mental illness vs Mind disease

When googling “disease vs illness”, Google’s AI says:

“Disease is the objective, medical diagnosis of a pathological abnormality (e.g., cancer, influenza). Illness is the subjective, personal experience of that condition, including feelings of pain, fatigue, and distress. You can have a disease without feeling ill (e.g., early hypertension) or feel ill without a clear disease.”

Although this does not match the etymology of the words, this is how medicine has chosen to use these two words. This then means that illnesses cannot be diagnosed, because they are subjective experiences. And as such, doctors diagnose diseases, not illnesses. Diseases are ailments with clear objective physiological causes, whereas an illness is a subjective experience of an individual, sometimes as a result of a disease.

Cardiologists diagnose cardiovascular diseases, dermatologists diagnose skin diseases, pulmonologists diagnose lung diseases, cancer is a disease that oncologists deal with, etc.

As such, if psychiatrists were doctors, they’d diagnose mind diseases with clear physiological causes, not mental illnesses. “Mental illness” refers to a subjective non-physical experience and cannot be diagnosed.

In Summary

Within the medical community, the word “illness” refers to a subjective experience of an individual, and the word “disease” refers to an objective medical diagnosis.

Psychiatric drugs

When googling “what do psychiatric drug studies show”, Google’s AI provides the following answer:

“Psychiatric drug studies show they can effectively manage severe symptoms like hallucinations or mood swings but often come with significant side effects, including cognitive dulling, emotional blunting, weight changes, and movement disorders, with long-term use sometimes worsening issues or causing dependence. Research highlights mixed results, with some evidence suggesting SSRIs can worsen mood in some, while antipsychotics may impair cognition, and overall, efficacy often depends on individual response, with combining medication with therapy being more effective.”

This in and of itself should make everyone question whether the administration of these drugs is a good thing, especially because pharmaceutical companies are heavily incentivized to influence these studies and undoubtedly do so. The sugar, tobacco, and alcohol industries did (or still do?) the exact same thing, namely, fund research that downplays negative health effects and promotes potential benefits.

Furthermore, the biggest problem with conducting studies on psychiatric drugs is figuring out what the right parameters for success are, because they are objectively subjective. Different people have different goals in life, and different people desire different lives. Some people don’t mind a tough and challenging life and make choices that lead to one. Others enjoy simple lives as farmers or baristas. These lives all come with vastly different challenges, experiences, and emotional states. How can the ones conducting research into psychiatric drugs say that some emotional states are inherently better than others? They cannot. And therefore, it’s impossible to set objectively positive targets for studies on psychiatric drugs, putting into question every single study ever done on psychiatric drugs.

But let’s for a second assume that all the skeptics of psychiatric drugs are wrong. Let’s assume that all drugs that alter brain chemistry are bad, such as cocaine and heroine, but that psychiatric drugs are the exception and that a correlation between taking them and something seen as objectively positive by all of society can be established. Even then, without any logic that would help us understand this correlation, this would still be unscientific. Reason being that a correlation between two things does not prove that one thing causes the other.

A great example to illustrate this is a basketball game. There is a strong correlation between having scored a large number of 3-pointers in a basketball game and being the winner of that basketball game. But is that because won basketball games often come along with a lot of 3-pointers made, or because a focus on making 3-pointers wins basketball games? If basketball teams solely focused on hitting as many 3-pointers as possible because data shows there is a correlation between hitting 3-pointers and winning basketball games, they would field less tall players sacrificing their ability to rebound, they would forget about playing proper defense, and a whole host of other things. They would certainly win less basketball games.

The bottom line is that a correlation does not imply a causation, and that without logic and understanding you cannot call something scientific. Science starts with logic and understanding, from which it theorizes and tests hypotheses. Psychiatry does not do any of this and therefore cannot be called a science. Psychiatric drugs are drugs that alter brain chemistry. This puts them in the same category as other drugs that do this, such as cocaine, heroine, LSD, alcohol, marijuana, ketamine, and the like. You cannot say that psychiatric drugs alter things like serotonin and dopamine, conduct studies showing a correlation between taking them and some outcomes thought to be positive by most of society, and then call it scientific proof that these drugs help people.

Sex also alters things like serotonin and dopamine, in a much more natural way than psychiatric drugs do, and I don’t think we need studies to show that sex generally leads to positive outcomes. That doesn’t mean it’s okay for psychiatrists to prescribe sex, or for psychiatrists to lock people up and force them to have sex. I assume there would be public outrage. So why isn’t there public outrage about what’s currently going on in places like IMH? Because a lot of the public isn’t aware of it, and most of the ones who are don’t understand what is actually being done to human beings inside these facilities.

Let’s also take a look at what psychiatric drugs do at a fundamental level. To understand this, first let’s dive into how the human brain works. The human brain consists of almost 100B neurons⁶, each of which is (on avg) connected to almost 10,000 other neurons⁷. In between neurons there exists space referred to as synaptic clefts that facilitate communication between neurons. There exist ~500 trillion such synaptic clefts in each human brain, or in other words the human brain contains ~500 trillion connections between neurons⁷.

The way one neuron communicates with another through one of these ~500 trillion connections is as follows. Neuron A activates and creates an electrical signal. When this electrical signal reaches the edge of the neuron, the neuron secretes chemicals into the synaptic cleft. The chemicals in this synaptic cleft then influence neuron B on the other side. Via this mechanism, neuron A is able to communicate with and influence neuron B.

There are more things we know about synapses (synapse = synaptic cleft + 1 membrane on each side), such as that the sending neuron can recycle chemicals via “reuptake”, and that there are over 100 different chemicals⁸ and over 1000 different proteins⁹ present in synapses. But to say that we understand what goes on in synapses would be a lie. To say that we understand how these 100+ chemicals, 1000+ proteins, and yet-to-be-identified elements work together in order to facilitate communication between neurons in ~500 trillion connections present in the human brain would be a lie. To say that we know how the chemical compositions of synapses affect the emotional well-being of individual human beings would be a lie.

Pharmaceutical companies have created drugs that alter the chemical compositions of synaptic clefts just like other drugs (cocaine, heroin, LSD, etc.) do. Pharmaceutical companies do not care about anyone’s well-being, their only objective is to make money, just like every other company. Some of the people who work for them may care, the companies that employ these people do not, nor does the vast majority of shareholders. These companies are entities who’s sole focus is increasing profits, and selling more psychiatric drugs increases profits. They do not care one bit about whether psychiatric drugs actually help individuals, although it helps them if society believes psychiatric drugs do.

As such, pharmaceutical companies and psychiatry are a match made in hell. Psychiatry has invented “mental illnesses” that it claims in many cases require lifetime treatment/management via psychiatric drugs. But what is really going on is that psychiatrists make their “patients” take drugs that affect the chemical compositions of ~500 trillion synapses in their brains, without any proof that there is anything wrong with these chemical compositions, based on studies that, in spite of being influenced by pharmaceutical companies to make these drugs look better than they are, still highlight mixed results.

I’ll say it again. Psychiatry and pharmaceutical companies are profiting off of the suffering of human beings. Emotional suffering is real. However, there is zero scientific backing for the existence of mind diseases, nor for psychiatric drugs improving emotional well-being. Zero. Psychiatrists convince people they have a mind disease and convince them they have to take psychiatric drugs to manage it, handing the pharmaceutical industry a new customer for life. This is the most evil hoax in the history of mankind.

In summary:

The desirabilities of emotional states are objectively subjective. As such, no objectively positive targets can be set for psychiatric drug studies.

Psychiatrists tell people they have a mind disease that requires (often times lifelong) consumption of psychiatric drugs to manage, thereby altering the chemical compositions of ~500 trillion synapses in the brains of their “patients”, in spite of not having an understanding of what this does to an individual. These drugs rewire human brains, and thereby alter human beings.

Making someone feel or behave a certain way via the involuntary administration of these drugs needs to be a crime.

Mutilation

An individual that captures, restrains, sedates, and performs involuntary cosmetic surgery on another individual, thereby changing the way that individual looks, is charged with physical mutilation.

It’s widely believed that what’s on the inside (character, values, heart, etc.) is more important than what’s on the outside (appearance, possessions, etc.).

Therefore, if an individual were to capture, restrain, sedate, and involuntarily alter the brain chemistry of another individual, thereby changing who that individual is on the inside, that is also a form of mutilation, and a worse one than physical mutilation.

Even though lobotomies have been banned, “mental health hospitals” still mutilate their “patients” via involuntary injections and the forced taking of psychiatric drugs.

In summary:

The act of changing who an individual is on the inside against the individual’s will is mutilation, just like changing what an individual looks like on the outside against the individual’s will is mutilation. This needs to be recognized as a crime.

Rape

(My apologies in advance for the graphic examples in this section, but they help illustrate a relevant and important point that needs to be made.)

Rape has to be defined as any non-consensual violation of the boundary of an individual’s body by another individual, in order to clearly draw a line as to what is and what isn’t legal. Otherwise, criminals can use loopholes to skirt around the law. I’ll illustrate this in the following paragraphs with a number of examples.

If a man were to strap a woman to a bed in a room, undress both of them, penetrate her vagina with his penis and ejaculate inside of her, the consequence to her (in addition to presumably severe emotional trauma) is that the semen will most likely drip out of her, or she gets pregnant and has the option to abort the pregnancy. A court of law considers this rape.

If, instead of penetrating her vagina with his penis, the man had masturbated and ejaculated in front of the woman, then put his semen into a custom-made ejaculating dildo in the shape of his penis, penetrated the woman’s vagina with his dildo, and pressed the dildo’s button, thereby injecting his semen into the woman, I can only hope that a court of law would still consider that rape, in spite of the man’s penis not having penetrated the woman’s vagina.

If, instead of using this ejaculating dildo to penetrate and insert his semen into her, the man had masturbated in front of the woman and used a syringe to penetrate the woman’s vagina and insert his semen into her, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of masturbating in front of her, the man had used the syringe to inject semen he had collected a few days earlier into the woman, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of his semen from a few days ago, the man had injected a mixture of 99% his semen and 1% psychiatric drugs, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of that mixture, the man had injected a mixture of 50% his semen and 50% psychiatric drugs, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead, the man had injected a mixture of 1% his semen and 99% psychiatric drugs, would a court of law still consider that rape? If no, where does the threshold lie?

If the man had masturbated in front of the woman, and injected his semen into her via a syringe, but instead of injecting them into her vagina, like the previous examples, had barely missed her vagina and injected them into her tissues or bloodstream near her vagina, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape, in spite of the semen having been injected into the woman through a newly created hole, instead of having been injected through an already existing hole.

If the man had masturbated in an adjacent room or had injected semen from a previous day into the woman’s tissues or bloodstream, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of pure semen, the man had injected 99% his semen and 1% psychiatric drugs into the woman’s tissues or bloodstream, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of that mixture, the man had injected 1% his semen and 99% psychiatric drugs into the woman’s tissues or bloodstream, I don’t think a court of law would consider that rape anymore. If this is true, where does the threshold lie?

If, instead of that mixture, the man had injected 100% psychiatric drugs into the woman’s tissues or bloodstream, I’m very confident a court of law would no longer consider that rape.

If the man had masturbated in front of the woman, sprayed his semen all over her, and then injected his urine into her vagina via a syringe, I hope that a court of law would consider that rape.

If, instead of injecting his urine into the woman’s vagina, after ejaculating on top of her the man had injected his urine into her tissues or bloodstream, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of ejaculating on top of the woman, the man had ejaculated next to her and injected his urine into her tissues or bloodstream, I hope that a court of law would still consider that rape.

If, instead of masturbating next to her, the man had masturbated and ejaculated in an adjacent bathroom, had told the woman about this, and had then injected his urine into her tissues or bloodstream, I suspect a court of law would no longer consider that rape. Which begs the question, in this example, how far away from the woman does the man have to ejaculate for his acts to no longer be considered rape by a court of law?

If any of the men in these examples had been psychiatrists in an otherwise empty “mental health hospital”, and the women had been involuntarily confined there, would that change the judgment of a court of law on whether any of these acts constitute rape?

I am not saying context and details do not matter, or that punishments for these varying acts should be the same. However, if the law is not more clearly defined, people can skirt the lines. Rape has to be defined as any non-consensual violation of the boundary of an individual’s body by another individual. And yes, rape can be non-sexual in nature. Otherwise you have to ask yourself where the boundary lies in respect to:

• What objects may and what objects may not be used to penetrate an individual against its will.

• What parts of an individual’s body may and what parts may not be penetrated against its will.

• What fluids may and what fluids may not be injected into an individual against its will.

• What acts a court of law will and what acts a court of law will not consider sexual in nature.

In “mental health hospitals”, psychiatrists instruct their nurses to bring fluids into the room the “patient” is in along with a syringe. The nurses then inject the “patient”, who is usually strapped to a bed and whose consent is deemed irrelevant, but instead of putting the fluids into a natural hole like a vagina or an asshole from which the fluids can drip out, new holes are created and the syringe penetrates the physical boundaries of the patient’s body, and the fluids end up in its tissues, from where they find their way to the brain via the bloodstream and alter that person's brain chemistry and life. On top of most likely emotional trauma of course. Although this act may not be sexual in nature, that does not change the fact that it is rape.

Putting aside the emotional trauma of being raped, which is different in each and every situation, in every other way the rape going on in “mental health hospitals” is worse than sexual rape, because the physical consequences (a rewired brain) are more severe and long-lasting.

Should rape be legal under some circumstances? It currently is. Is all rape equal? No, of course not. But what is done to human beings in mental health hospitals undeniably constitutes rape. They are strapped to beds and have fluids injected into them against their wills. If that isn’t rape, then strapping a woman to a bed and injecting her with things like urine, spit, blood, acid, and whatever other depraved fluids you can think of isn’t rape either, as long as semen are not injected, or as long as the semen are adequately diluted with “socially accepted” fluids.

Or in other words, rape shouldn’t be defined as a penis penetrating a vagina without consent. Rape needs to be defined as penetrating an individual’s body without consent, especially when fluids are also injected into the body without the individual’s consent. Punishments, as always, should depend on details, circumstances, and context. And a separate category for sexual rape can still exist, although it’s hard to define what is and what isn’t sexual, because that is subjective and different for each individual.

In summary:

The law needs to define rape more clearly as any non-consensual violation of the boundary of an individual’s body by another individual, in order to prevent criminals from skirting around the boundaries of the law.

This does not mean all rape is equal, nor that all rape has to be punished equally.

Suicide prevention is the worst crime

Murder is generally considered to be the worst crime in human society, but this is based on the assumption that life is a good thing and provably wrong via simple logic.

First, let’s talk about the assumption that life is a good thing. Although it is fortunate that most people see life as a good thing, this isn’t always the case. One sign of this is the existence of antinatalism¹⁰, the belief that it’s unethical to bring sentient beings into this world. Regardless of whether life as a whole is a good thing or a bad thing, the existence of antinatalism proves that at least for some individuals life is not a good thing.

Furthermore, there are children who die in infancy. Some young girls are raped and murdered. Some children grow up in war and die before the war ends. And Joseph Murphy (nicknamed Pyro Joe from “I Am A Killer” S02E06) is a man who, as a 6-yr old, was whored out to men for beer money by his father, and lit on fire by his parents, among other things. He committed murder at the age of 21 and is currently spending his life in prison. Although only these individuals themselves can determine whether their lives are a good and desirable thing, looking at these lives from the outside, it’s hard to imagine them being desirable.

But the irrefutable proof that life for some individuals is undesirable are these facts¹¹:

• Almost 1.5% of all deaths are by suicide. It is a leading cause of death.

• More than 700,000 people end their own lives each year.

• Suicide is the third leading cause of death among 15-29 year olds.

(These are in spite of negative stigma around suicide in the form of societal pressures and religious beliefs telling people not to end their own lives. If not for those, suicide rates would be much higher than they are.)

Suicide is frightening. If you’ve never been suicidal, you can try to imagine what it’d take for you to kill yourself. If you can’t imagine what that’d take, all you can do is understand that you cannot understand.

People who end their lives being dumb and not understanding the mistake they’re making is not what’s going on here. That’s projecting your personal experience that life is desirable onto others. There are reasons why people choose to end their lives, and not being able to understand them as an outsider, doesn’t make people who commit suicide dumb or irrational.

Would some people who commit suicide, if they had chosen to endure and not end their lives prematurely, at the end of their not-prematurely-ended lives have been happy they chose not to end them prematurely? Quite possibly. Sometimes people make mistakes. However, to say that every individual that ends its life prematurely makes a mistake it would’ve regretted had it not made it is beyond delusional and shows an inability to understand and empathize.

Finally, let’s look at why logic dictates that suicide prevention is the worst crime. In order to do this, one has to analyze and look at what murder and suicide prevention are at a fundamental level.

Murder, assuming that the victim wanted to continue its life and was enjoying its life, and assuming that the murder was quick and painless, denies an individual something positive that it wants. It’s like taking away candy or pizza from a child.

Suicide prevention, assuming the victim wants to end its life and is not enjoying its life, forces an individual to experience something horrible that it doesn’t want to experience, and that it deems worse than suicide. It’s like forcing a child to eat shit.

Circumstances always matter, and so just as murder is legal under some circumstances (death penalty, war, euthanasia, etc.), suicide prevention can also be legal under some circumstances. But it cannot be legal to indefinitely prevent individuals from ending their own lives under the assumption that they’ll be happier off alive. Fundamentally, suicide prevention is the worst crime known to mankind, and so it needs to be treated as such and used with extreme caution, because suicide prevention can sentence individuals to a fate far worse than death.

In Summary

Fundamentally, murder takes away life (something good) from an individual, whereas suicide prevention forces an individual to experience a fate worse than death (something bad). Experiencing something bad is worse than not experiencing something good, and as such suicide prevention is logically a worse crime than murder, with the asterisk that suicide prevention can be temporary and murder is final.

Involuntary Human Alteration Facilities

I’ve already explained why in my opinion the term emotional well-being is a better term to use than “mental health”. Now I will explain why the term “mental health hospital” is inaccurate and propose a more accurate term.

The term “mental health hospital” implies that individuals go to a place when they are mentally ill, and leave cured, or at a minimum improved, in the majority of cases. One could also assume that doctors and/or nurses in these places provide care and treatment based on diagnoses, and that that care and treatment are the reasons why the “patients” leave cured.

I’ve already explained why the existence of mind diseases is a belief, not a scientific fact, and why their diagnoses are based on opinions and beliefs rather than scientific evidence. Now, let’s look at what goes on in these places and whether the care and treatment from the psychiatrists and nurses are likely to improve or worsen the emotional well-being of the individuals that end up there.

First, let’s look at perhaps the biggest difference between hospitals and mental health hospitals, the way in which individuals end up there. Most individuals that end up in hospitals go there out of their own volition. Out of the individuals who are brought to hospitals without their consent because they aren’t able to speak due to being unconscious, you’ll be extremely hard-pressed to find individuals who aren’t grateful that they were brought there. I don’t know that anyone ends up at a hospital against its will.

In mental health hospitals, on the other hand, you’ll find mostly people who are there involuntarily. During my three involuntary confinements, I did not come across a single person who was there voluntarily, although it’s possible that this is due to the specific wards I was held in. I wonder how many people go to these facilities entirely out of their own volition with neither a referral from a psychiatrist nor pressure from a person close to them. Rarely do people have to be told to go to a hospital, especially in acute cases. Generally, when someone needs to go to a hospital, they want to go to a hospital. The same cannot be said for mental health hospitals, which most people do their bests to stay out of, especially people who’ve been there before, and which in many ways are more akin to prisons than hospitals. Next, let’s take a look as to what may be the causes of these differences.

After, in most cases involuntarily, having been brought to a mental health hospital against your will, you are confined to a ward with, based on my experience, 30-50 other individuals who are deemed to have a mind disease. Common sense would dictate that a person suffering emotionally would do well to spend time with loved ones who can provide support. It’s not beneficial for individuals who are suffering emotionally to be locked up with 30-50 others who are also suffering emotionally, none of which know each other, and none of which are in a place from which they can provide support to others, because they need to be there for themselves.

The nursing staff, from my experience, mostly does a decent job. There are a few outstanding nurses, but also a few who shouldn’t be anywhere near individuals that are suffering emotionally, but variance in quality is to be expected. But these are just my personal experiences.

What I can state factually is that the nurses do not have the time or resources to provide any real care. I saw a few nurses try their best. One made its phone available for brief periods for some music, another hosted a picture drawing session on a quiet Sunday, and things like that. However, these are few and far between. Most days the nurses spend every single hour managing the day-to-day, which consists of opening the showers, serving food, moving patients in and out of sections of the ward, taking vitals (even though none of the patients are physically ill), writing down notes for the psychiatrists, etc. Most days, the only interactions with nurses are along the lines of asking questions such as “when is lunchtime”, and being told to do something such as “take a shower”. These do not qualify as care.

Psychiatrists have even less interaction with the individuals that they refer to as their patients. A session with the psychiatrists lasts around 15 minutes, and if you’re lucky you have two of those a week, but most of the time there’s only one per week, and I talked to one individual who told me he hadn’t seen a psychiatrist for multiple weeks.

As for the “sessions” with the psychiatrists, I only know about my own experiences, which were extremely frustrating. In sessions with a psychologist or counselor, which I’ve had hundreds of over the years, it’s all about the client and the client has the space to talk about the things the client wants to talk about. During my sessions with psychiatrists at IMH, it was never about me. It was all about what the psychiatrists wanted to talk to me about, and when I tried to talk about the things that I wanted to talk about that I deemed important, such as why I was being held against my will, I got shut down.

Then there are the drugs that you are forced to take in mental health hospitals. If a psychiatrist in charge of you at a mental health hospital wants you to take drugs, there is nothing you can say or do to not take drugs, and if you refuse to take them, you are tortured into obedience until you do, and in the meantime the drugs are injected into you anyway. No matter how bad the drugs make you feel, no matter your personal beliefs or desires, no matter what you know to be best for you, the psychiatrists will put the drugs (that rewire your brain) into your system one way or another.

There are also drugs in the food. The labels on the meals at IMH clearly have “thin therapeutic fluids” written on them. And based on my personal experience and talking to others, I know there are “vitamins” in the milo, most likely to be some sort of light stimulant. The milo is served after drugs are distributed in the evening to make the patients feel artificially happy after they take the drugs, thereby manipulating them and helping them build an addiction to psychiatric drugs. Ironically, some people actually come to mental health hospitals to cure their addictions to substances such as alcohol and tobacco, but some of these individuals merely end up replacing their addictions with addictions to a different substance, psychiatric drugs.

If you ever find yourself in a mental health hospital, I strongly suggest you do your best to hide your emotions and not act up in any way, and act like you are a totally average person not suffering emotionally, even if you are suffering emotionally. The reason for this is that mental health hospitals will torture and rape you in the form of restraining you and sedating you if you act up too much or don’t do as the staff say. It’s somewhat understandable to punish, perhaps even to the point of restraining, an individual who physically assaults others, especially during periods during which the nurses have their hands full, such as lunchtime. However, I am proof that the threshold for this is extremely low, as I was punished for attempting to go through a door that was half open, for being scared, and even for simply sleeping. I was also undeniably tortured for not willingly taking psychiatric drugs orally.

Furthermore, the individuals that are locked up in mental health hospitals are suffering emotionally. If you punish them for things such as suffering emotionally, for showing you they are suffering emotionally (which can be looked at as an indirect way of asking for help), and for showing you their emotions, in essence what you are teaching them is that it’s not okay to suffer emotionally, that it’s not okay to show you they need help, and that it’s not okay for them to show you their emotions. Unless you’ve experienced this treatment first-hand, I don’t think you can understand the damage this does to an individual. To be punished for being you, and in essence to be told by the world that it’s not okay to be you.

All-in-all, it’s impossible to make a credible case that the treatment in mental health hospitals helps the individuals on the receiving end of it. There would have to be some real magic going on somewhere in order to not only outweigh the negative impact of the treatment and lack of care I’ve listed out, but also to provide any sort of positive impact. Yes, pharmaceutical drugs alter mood, but so does cocaine. Who’s to say whether changes in behavior and emotions are positive? Psychiatrists? The desirabilities of emotional states are objectively subjective, and psychiatrists generally attempt to reduce emotions and behavior, which as I illustrated with the Antelopes example, is a terrible idea. I’ll add that it’s extremely odd that society does not accept people drugging away their own problems via things like alcohol, but that society does accept psychiatrists drugging away the problems of people they barely know, in many cases against their wills, via psychiatric drugs.

Considering all of this, I think it’s clear that the term “mental health hospital” is not an accurate way to refer to places such as IMH. Personally, the term Involuntary Human Alteration Facility is one of the more neutral and accurate terms I can come up with*, because in essence individuals are brought there involuntarily when they are deemed to be out of line, and they are altered against their wills via methods such as torture, rape, mutilation, and forced taking of psychiatric drugs that have no scientific backing.

*Church of Psychiatry, Institute of Mind-Rape, and Rape House are less neutral terms I’ve used in private.

Henceforth, I will refer to the individuals that go through involuntary human alteration facilities as victims rather than patients, because based on my personal experiences, based on talking to others within these places, and based on looking at a basic fundamental level at what is done to individuals in these places, referring to them as anything other than victims is denying reality. One other victim told me he wouldn’t wish IMH on his worst enemies.

In summary:

Looking at what is done to “patients” in “mental health hospitals” at a fundamental level, which includes involuntary confinement, restraint, torture, rape, and mutilation, it is impossible to argue that these facilities help the individuals that are involuntarily confined to them. Even if psychiatric drugs were proven to help people feel better, it’s hard to imagine those wonder-drugs offsetting all of these horrendous acts.

Involuntary human alteration facilities need to be banned by law, unless society wants it to be legal to lock up, torture, rape, and mutilate the individuals that are suffering the most. Sadly, this is currently legal.

Mental Health Laws

Mental health laws allow the involuntary confinement and treatment of individuals that are deemed to be a danger to themselves or to others. The latter part of this law (danger to others) is not only morally wrong, it is straight up illegal. Let’s discuss the moral aspect first.

Let’s imagine a scenario in which science is able to find correlations between an unborn baby’s DNA and a high likelihood, let’s say 90%, that this individual will commit a crime in its lifetime. In this scenario, would it be morally okay to lock this baby up in a “DNA Alteration Facility” for the first month of its life, so that the part of its DNA that correlates to crime can be altered?

As a society it may be tempting to do this in order to protect yourself from these likely-to-commit-crimes babies, but you’re essentially saying that these babies are guilty before they’ve done anything wrong, let alone entered a courtroom. And what about the 10% that won’t commit a crime in their lifetimes that you’re altering for no reason?

I hope that this scenario would face severe backlash if it were to be implemented, even though it’s a very strong proven correlation between something that can be proven to exist (DNA) and crime. Then how come there is no backlash against mental health laws that essentially do the same but to adults? But instead of being based on a strong scientifically proven correlation, it’s done based on theories based on the existence of diseases of a mind, which cannot be proven to exist. DNA can be proven to exist, a mystical human mind cannot be proven to exist.

Individuals are locked up and altered in involuntary human alteration facilities via mental health laws, because psychiatrists theorize/believe that the behaviors of these individuals are a result of diseases of a mind that psychiatrists believe exists, and because psychiatrists believe that these mind diseases will lead to crimes.

As insane as this is, the much bigger issue with locking up individuals who are believed to be a danger to others is that this is done in the best interest of ‘the others’, not in the best interest of the individuals. As a result, you are not acting in the best interest of the individuals, and thereby as soon as you lock these individuals up you are in violation of the law that dictates you have to act in the best interest of these individuals.

This is equivalent to a lawyer taking on a client because it’s in the best interest of the opposing party that is also a client at the same firm, but then doing its best to act in the best interest of that client. It’s logically impossible, and it’d be in the client’s best interest if that client-lawyer relationship was severed, just like it’s in the best interest of anyone locked up in an involuntary human alteration facility for the deemed protection of others to be released.

As such, mental health laws and involuntary human alteration facilities are an illegal combination. It can in theory be legal to lock an individual up for its own presumed/theorized protection and still act in its best interest (although in my opinion this needs to be illegal as well). However, it is logically impossible to lock up an individual for the presumed/theorized protection of others and still act in its best interest, because the involuntary confinement is in the best interest of others. Therefore, it is illegal to lock someone up in an involuntary human alteration facility for the protection of others.

In summary

Using mental health laws to lock an individual up for the protection of others is illegal, because you are acting in the best interests of others and thereby are breaking the law that dictates you have to act in the individual’s best interest.

Paranoid Delusions

A term psychiatrists use. Google AI says:

“Paranoid delusions are fixed, false beliefs that others are trying to harm, persecute, or plot against you, even without evidence.”

Definition of belief per the Oxford Dictionary:

“An acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.”

As such, according to the Oxford Dictionary, a lack or absence of evidence is what makes something a belief in the first place.

Therefore, the fact that psychiatrists use the term “paranoid delusions” is proof that psychiatry is either completely unscientific and doesn’t even understand the definition of a basic word like “belief”, or it’s intentionally trying to eradicate specific human beliefs.

Freedom of belief is a fundamental human right protected by international laws like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as Article 15 of Singapore’s constitution. Psychiatry is violating these laws by using terms such as “paranoid delusions”.

In summary:

Psychiatry selectively attacks beliefs stating they are delusions without any proof that these beliefs are false. Hereby, psychiatry is in direct violation of the international human rights law that states that freedom of belief is a fundamental human right, as well as article 15 of Singapore’s constitution.

Who is in the best position to judge whether one individual loves or hates another individual?

Let’s begin exploring this question by looking at a love-bombing physically abusive male and his female partner. This is an example that is unfortunately not that uncommon in human society. A woman with usually low self-esteem, and perhaps parents who didn’t love her, is desperately looking for someone, almost anyone, who loves her. She finds a male who is interested in her, they date, and over time they connect and move in together.

The male frequently tells the woman that he loves her, and he treats her well on some days. However, perhaps due to his own childhood or alcohol problems, there are also many days on which he is physically abusive and beats her to a pulp. Many women in situations like these stay for a long time, because they believe their men are in the best position to judge whether their men love them, or perhaps because to them love is verbally being told they are loved. Who are we to judge. However, most women in situations like these eventually become aware that their men’s physically abusive behaviors make them feel bad about themselves, and end up leaving, realising that they are in a better position to judge who loves them than their partners.

Another example to drive home the point that the individual on the receiving end of love/hate/feelings is in the best position to judge whether they are loved, is to consider that everyone has different preferences. If a girl bakes cookies for 100 different men, some of them will be ecstatic, feel loved, and say that the girl loves them. Others may say the girl hates them because they baked a type of cookies they don’t like, or because the girl forgot that they’re allergic to gluten.

Now let’s look at whether 3^rd parties may potentially have a better view than the individual on the receiving end. To do that, let’s consider the following scenario. A woman has been dating a man for a few months. Over lunch with 10 of her girlfriends, she shares stories and asks for their opinions on how the man feels about her. She’s getting older and wants to get married soon, so she wants to make a decision on whether to invest more time into this relationship or not. Her girlfriends end up being split 50-50 on whether this man loves her or not. Although this woman is perfectly within her right to outsource this important life decision, and even have lunch with another 10 friends to ask for their opinions, who do you think is ultimately in the best position to make this life-altering decision and decide whether this man loves her or hates her, and whether to potentially get married to this man? I think it’s hard to argue against she herself being in the best position to do so and to make this decision.

At the end of the day, the person on the receiving end of feelings, behavior, and treatment is the best judge of whether others love or hate it.

In summary:

The individual on the receiving end of feelings is the best judge on whether another individual loves or hates it.

Who is in the best position to judge whether one individual is a danger to another individual?

First, let’s get a better understanding of the word “danger”, which the Oxford Languages Dictionary defines as the possibility of suffering harm or injury. Injury is pretty easy to understand. Harm is a little bit more vague, but then further defined as “physical injury or damage to health”. Physical injury is clear, whereas “damage to health” is a very subjective term. Some individuals say their health is damaged when they eat a burger or a tub of ice cream, whereas others have different standards and say even a flesh wound is no big deal, will heal over time, and doesn’t really impact their health.

So who is in the best position to judge whether one individual is a danger to another? On one hand, there’s the individual who is the best judge of what constitutes injury and an impact on its health, which is clearly the one on the receiving end. Everyone is allowed to set its own boundaries. However, on the other hand the individual who is most in control of an individual’s future actions is the individual taking those actions. Granted, some individuals lie for personal gain, and individuals don’t always have the same amount of control over their actions (e.g. an intoxicated person). A person might ring your doorbell saying it is there to fix your AC, but after you let the person inside, the person could potentially assault you and steal your belongings. Then again, an individual can also lie and say someone is a danger to it. Think of someone claiming they were threatened, stalked, or even assaulted, to get back at an ex they absolutely hate. These situations are rare, but they’re not impossible.

What about 3^rd parties? Could psychiatrists be in the best position to judge whether one individual is a danger to another? Let’s assume for a moment that this is the case. If it were, that would mean that psychiatrists should be in charge of restraining orders and perhaps even interpersonal relationships. If a psychiatrist were to be able to gauge better than, for example couples, whether they are a danger to each other, by reasoning it would be best if psychiatrists interviewed every couple before it got married, and vetoed marriages in which they deem that one of the two is a danger to the other.

You can also ask yourself what a judgment, which is all that it is, of whether one individual may be a danger to another is based on. Knowledge of what kind of person the individual is, knowledge of how the individual feels towards the other individual, knowledge of how both individuals have treated each other in the past, and many other factors are important considerations in such a judgment call. Who has access to most such information and the most accurate access? Certainly not a 3^rd party, but the individuals themselves. I think it’s best to let each individual have the final judgement on who is and isn’t a danger to it, because otherwise no one would be able to get a restraining order, because the one who the restraining order is being filed against would be able to claim to know better and overrule the request.

In summary:

Every individual should have the final say in who is and who isn’t a danger to it.

Who is in the best position to decide what’s best for an individual?

Personally, I don’t understand how anyone could possibly disagree with the obvious answer to this question, which is that each and every individual is in the best position to decide what’s best for itself. But let me illustrate why this is undeniably so.

What sorts of factors and information are most important to decide what is best for an individual? I’d list things such as desires, goals, past experiences, present circumstances, impact of choices on loved ones, etc. But really, every single moment of an individual’s life history goes into making decisions at any given point in time. Who knows the most about all of this? Obviously the individual itself.

Perhaps the best way to understand this is by considering that different people have different preferences when it comes to just about everything. Some people love thrills and skydiving, others don’t. Some people love chill afternoons and reading books, others can’t stand it. So when someone has to decide whether to go skydiving that afternoon or read a book, who is in the best position to decide which to go for? The individual. Dating preferences are the same. Different individuals will treat and make you feel very differently. Who is in the best position to choose whom to date? The individual. Whether to spend time at an involuntary human alteration facility and whether to take psychiatric drugs are no different.

Ultimately, the one in the best position to decide what’s best for an individual is the individual itself. Do some individuals have temporary lapses in judgment, such as when they are intoxicated? Of course. But they made the choice to become intoxicated, and as such will have to live with the consequences of their actions while they’re drunk, like if they drunk call someone.

Can it sometimes be more difficult for someone under severe stress and pressure to make the correct decisions, such as a suicidal person? It can be, and so temporarily preventing someone from making what could be an irreversible mistake can be acceptable, but ultimately the individual remains in the best position to make its own decisions. And so if the individual remains suicidal even after a long period of restraint and best-efforts to help it, the individual should be allowed to end its life. Euthanasia and assisted dying/suicide exist for a reason.

Ask yourself why some people are allowed to choose death and others aren’t. Why is it legal to die in some situations and illegal in others? Who decides this, and why isn’t it always the individual who is allowed to make this choice? Because most people can’t fathom that it’s possible to suffer to such an extent that death is preferred, and so they believe they are stopping someone from making a mistake.

Euthanasia is legal in some countries in some situations. Refusing treatment for diseases such as cancer is also legal, which in most cases is equal to choosing death. But people who suffer severely emotionally in ways that no one is able to understand other than that individual are not allowed to choose death, and are instead locked up, tortured, raped, mutilated, and altered? And in some cases turned into near-vegetables for the remaining decades that their physical bodies hold out? Can you imagine the amount of suffering you are causing that individual who already wanted to die, and is now locked up for decades, tortured, raped, and has to live out its remaining years in an involuntary human alteration facility? No one can imagine such suffering, and society is doing this to them. Saying society is helping them by keeping them alive is just deluding oneself.

Involuntary human alteration facilities could be of the opinion that locking individuals up, torturing them, raping them, mutilating them, and forcing them to take psychiatric drugs that they in many cases end up dependent on, is best for someone or something other than the individual. They could be of the opinion that this is best for society, so that society doesn’t have to bother with or take care of the ones who are suffering severely emotionally. But if so, they need to clearly communicate this to the general public instead of deceiving it. So that everyone understands what these places really are, and can make informed decisions on whether to support them.

Lastly, I’ll finish off with the following. It's not considered okay for one person to claim to know what is best for a country and be solely in charge of a country against that country's will. We refer to this as a dictatorship and I don't know of anyone who wants to live in a dictatorship. However, it is considered okay for one person to claim to know what is best for a human being and be solely (or with a group of others, making the power imbalance even more severe) in charge of a human being against its will, when the former is a psychiatrist and the latter a victim locked up in an involuntary human alteration facility.

The fact that involuntary human alteration facilities exist the way they do should make everyone appalled.

In summary:

Every individual knows what’s best for it.

Psychiatry’s origin

The word psychiatry originates from the greek words “psukhē” meaning soul and “iatreia” meaning healing. Thousands of years ago, extreme behaviors in certain individuals were thought to be supernatural in origin¹², and for a long time psychiatry attempted to “heal” these behaviors by healing the “soul”. It was only a few hundred years ago that psychiatry pivoted to healing the “mind”.

As such, the origin of psychiatry is the observation of behaviors, emotions, and beliefs that are deemed extreme and poorly understood. Thousands of years ago these behaviors were explained by a belief in the supernatural, but over time that has morphed into an attempt to explain these behaviors, emotions, and beliefs via a belief in the existence of a “mind” (which is technically still a belief in something supernatural) that psychiatry has attempted to link to the human brain.

The way in which psychiatry has done so, is by first grouping behaviors, emotions, and beliefs, that it sees as symptoms, into categories, such as ADHD, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, etc. These groups were created by either single psychiatrists (Eugen Bleuler in 1908 – Schizophrenia¹³), or groups of psychiatrists (Group of US clinicians in mid-1970s – Major Depressive Disorder¹⁴).

Since creating these groups with objectively subjective criteria, psychiatry has done its best to link them to physiological causes, such as genes and biomarkers. Thus far, psychiatry has only been able to prove the existence of correlations, which do not imply causations, but the existences of these correlations are unsurprising, just like it’d be unsurprising to find that women with large breasts have genes and biomarkers in common and to find that men with a low body fat % have genes and biomarkers in common.

In essence, what psychiatry is is a group of human beings, who refer to themselves as psychiatrists, who have decided that certain behaviors, emotions, and beliefs are undesirable on behalf of others. And in order to try and eliminate these behaviors, emotions, and beliefs, psychiatry is attempting to find the root causes of them and is searching for ways to eliminate them. Which can be viewed as psychiatry attempting to eliminate certain types of human beings. It can even be seen as psychiatry attempting to disprove the existence of free will, because if behaviors, emotions, and beliefs could all be perfectly explained by things such as genes and biomarkers, that’d disprove the existence of free will.

If psychiatry truly wanted to help people via eliminating undesired behaviors, emotions, and beliefs, it’d approach things differently:

1. Talk to individuals and ask them if they have undesired behaviors, emotions, and/or beliefs.

2. Note down which behaviors, emotions, and/or beliefs the individuals find undesirable, which is objectively subjective and 100% up to the individuals. Outsiders, such as psychiatrists, have zero say in this, and different people will list different things as desirable and undesirable.

3. Attempt to discover the actual root causes of these undesired behaviors, emotions, and/or beliefs via the scientific method, without any biases towards the outcome, and with a willingness to admit that one can’t find the answer. (Which is what I personally expect the outcome will be, because the answers to some questions, such as “why am I the way I am?”, can only be found within by individuals themselves.)

This is in stark contrast to what psychiatry is currently doing, which is grasping at correlations that the general public will belief are causes for the behaviors, emotions, and beliefs psychiatry has deemed undesirable on behalf of the individuals exhibiting these behaviors, emotions, and beliefs.

Psychiatry is neither objective nor attempting to help human beings, because psychiatry’s very existence is in danger. If it were to be proven that psychiatry does not know the root causes of the behaviors, emotions, and beliefs it’s deemed undesirable on behalf of others, psychiatry would collapse. If society were to understand that the desirabilities of the behaviors, emotions, and beliefs (that psychiatry has deemed to be undesirable on behalf of others) are objectively subjective, psychiatry would cease to exist.

Psychiatry, just like human beings do, is doing its best to survive. But the only way for psychiatry to survive is to deceive humanity into believing it has the answers to emotional suffering, even though it doesn’t. This is why psychiatry is a hoax.

In Summary

Psychiatry is the pursuit of eradicating specific human behaviors, emotions, and beliefs that one finds undesirable in others, while deluding oneself (and the world) that the ones you’re eradicating them from also find them undesirable, and that you’re doing this to help the individuals you’re eradicating these traits from.

The Most Evil Hoax in the History of Mankind

Let’s compare psychiatry to other atrocities in the history of mankind. Human society has not always been right in the past, nor has the law. Two great examples of this are the holocaust and slavery. Within Nazi German society, jews were seen as inferior beings. And the law used to state that specific human beings (in the Americas generally those with darker skin colors) were livestock.

Today, most people agree that Nazi German society was wrong about jews, and that the laws that used to state that some humans are livestock were also wrong. These are real historical examples of how both the law and society can be wrong. Today, both the law and society are wrong about psychiatry, because it is a hoax and it is deceiving humanity.

In order to look at how bad psychiatry is, let’s compare it to slavery and the holocaust and let’s look at three factors:

Scale

• Slavery dates back at least 6,000 years¹⁵ to Sumer, the earliest known civilization. At least 100s of millions of distinct individuals in human history have been slaves.

• Nazi Germany directly murdered 6 million jews¹⁶, but the 3.5 million European jews who survived were also affected, and one could argue that jews outside of Europe were indirectly affected as well. As such, at least ~10 million jews were affected.

• As of today, almost 10 million people¹⁷ are locked up in involuntary human alteration facilities each year, and 100s of millions of people¹⁸ take psychiatric drugs each day. Furthermore, involuntary human alteration facilities date back to the 9^th century, when they were initially constructed throughout Arab countries¹⁹.

Targeting

• Although slavery in the Americas by far and large specifically targeted people with darker skin colors, throughout history that was not the case, and it was generally people with power taking advantage of people with less power.

• The holocaust specifically targeted jews based on their religious beliefs.

• Psychiatry specifically targets the individuals that are emotionally suffering the most.

Crimes

• Living a life in slavery is (presumably) a horrible experience, but other than during the transatlantic voyage, suicide rates among slaves were low²⁰. This means that, although there were notable exceptions, and although it’s hard to imagine the suffering that comes along with living a life in slavery, slaves generally did not suffer to the extent that death was preferred.

• I will not attempt to put the atrocities committed against the jews during the holocaust into words. But one can read up on what it was like to die in a concentration camp.

• Some of psychiatry’s crimes aren’t that bad, because even though none of psychiatry’s victims are able to give informed consent for “treatment” due to psychiatry’s deceits, most are only deceived and not physically coerced.
  However, the worst of psychiatry’s crimes are undeniably worse than any of the atrocities committed by slavery or the holocaust. Psychiatry inflicts a fate worse than death upon some of its victims. To be suicidal and to be on the verge of choosing a horrible lonely death by suicide means that continuing to live one’s life is only barely better than this terrible lonely death. Psychiatry cuts actively suicidal individuals off from their least bad option (lonely suicide) via suicide prevention, and then makes the already horrible lives of these individuals even worse via involuntary confinement, restraint, torture, rape, and mutilation.
  In the worst cases, people who already had lives so bad they wanted to die, are forced to live even worse lives in captivity, essentially as vegetables, in some cases for decades. A lot of people can to some extent imagine dying in a concentration camp to be extremely bad, no one but these individuals themselves can claim to have any idea of how bad of a fate psychiatry bestows upon them.

In Summary

Psychiatry is the most evil hoax in the history of mankind.

Psychiatry is a religion posing as a science, not a science, nor a form of medicine or healthcare

Psychiatry is neither a science nor a form of medicine, due to its lack of any underlying science. “Correlation does not imply causation” is a fundamental scientific principle. All psychiatry does is violate this principle. If psychiatry abided by this fundamental scientific principle, nothing would be left of it.

Psychiatry hasn’t proven a single thing other than the existence of correlations between the use of psychiatric drugs and certain outcomes, but those studies are influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and objectively positive targets cannot be set. The existence of correlations between some brain activities and some human emotions and behaviors hasn’t even been proven by psychiatry but by neuroscience. And of course, correlations do not imply causations.

What psychiatry really boils down to is the belief that humans have a “mind”. If you ask a dermatologist what it’s a doctor of, and to prove to you it exists, it’ll answer the skin and point to its skin and to your skin. If you ask the same of a cardiologist, it may invite you to an operating room or a morgue, so you can see the human heart during surgery or autopsy. If you ask the same of an oncologist, it can invite you to its lab and show you the difference between healthy cells and cancerous cells.

If you ask a physicist what it’s scientifically researching, it can jump up and you can both observe it come back down. It can also roll a ball across the floor and you can both observe the ball coming to a halt. If you ask the same of a chemist, it can invite you to its lab where you can observe molecules through a microscope. If you ask the same of a biologist, it can invite you to its lab and you can observe things like DNA and bacteria through a microscope.

If you ask the same of a psychiatrist, it’ll say “the mind”, but it’ll be unable to prove “the mind’s” existence to you. Psychiatrists are like children playing doctor on dolls when they imagine the dolls are ill. The difference is that psychiatrists are playing doctor based on their beliefs and imaginations on real human beings who are suffering emotionally, without informed consent, and often times even against the will of those real human beings. And psychiatry is deceiving society by telling it that its beliefs and imaginations are real scientific facts, and society is not smart enough to understand that psychiatry’s beliefs are not scientific facts.

Psychiatrists are treating human “minds” that they believe exist by altering the real brains of human beings via the administration of psychiatric drugs. Psychiatrists are treating things they imagine/theorize/belief exist, by altering the real brains of human beings, that psychiatry has zero jurisdiction over, because neurologists are the world’s foremost experts on fixing things that are wrong with human brains. Altering brains via psychiatric drugs in the hopes that it’ll cure minds is equivalent to altering bodies via chemotherapy in the hopes that it’ll cleanse souls.

Psychiatrists rewire the brains of their victims in spite of a total absence of evidence that there is anything wrong with their brains. Psychiatrists diagnose their victims based on them exhibiting similar behaviors, emotions, and/or beliefs as others. Psychiatrists diagnose by analogy. And because some (heavily influenced) studies show that psychiatric drugs can reduce some of these behaviors/emotions/beliefs that psychiatry’s handbook (the DSM) has stated are undesirable on behalf of human society, psychiatrists prescribe their victims, force their victims to take, and even inject into their victims, psychiatric drugs that alter the chemical compositions of 500 trillion synapses in their brains, thereby rewiring their brains and altering them.

Psychiatry is not a science. Psychiatry is not a form of medicine or healthcare. What psychiatry really is is a religion, because all it is is a system of beliefs built upon correlations, a few examples of which are:

• The belief that all humans have a mystical mind. No proof for its existence exists.

• The belief that mind diseases exist. Before one can proof that something can be affected by a disease, one first has to be able to proof that it exists.

• The belief that the things that make us human (emotions, behaviors, beliefs, etc.) are symptoms that need to be managed.

• The belief that psychiatric drugs improve life outcomes, in spite of research being divided and proving nothing.

• The belief (but really delusion) that certain emotional states, behaviors, and life outcomes are objectively better than others.

• The belief (but really delusion) that involuntary human alteration facilities help its victims via treatment in the form of involuntary confinement, torture, rape, mutilation, and alteration.

• The belief (but really delusion) that psychiatrists, especially those in involuntary human alteration facilities, know better than their victims what’s best for them. A real doctor would never treat a patient against the patient’s wish. The right to refuse healthcare is a fundamental patient right in healthcare that psychiatrists violate.

• The delusion that it’s okay to attack other people’s beliefs by leveraging what are thought of as professional opinions to state that they are delusions, in spite of a total absence of evidence to support that the belief is false. This is in direct violation of international human rights laws.

In summary

Psychiatry is not a science because the existence of that which it claims to conduct scientific research into (the “mind”) cannot be proven.

Psychiatry is also not a form of medicine, because something has to be scientific before it can be a form of medicine. Furthermore, psychiatry diagnoses by analogy rather than examination, and it rewires its victims’ brains (which is the area of neuroscience not psychiatry) in spite of a total absence of evidence that there is anything wrong with their brains.

Psychiatry is also not a form of healthcare, because it violates a fundamental rule in healthcare, the patient’s right to refuse treatment.

Psychiatry is a system of beliefs, a number of which are delusional. This makes psychiatry a religion.

The only other way to view psychiatry

The only way to view psychiatry other than as a religion is as follows. Let’s first look at the concept of the “economy” as a comparison for the concept of the “mind”.

The “economy” is a concept that humanity has come up with. The economy consists of many things, some examples of which are:

• Money

• Trade

• Companies

• Consumers

• Material Goods

The existence of these things can all be confirmed:

• Money exists in physical form in the form of paper and coins, as well as in digital form as numbers in bank accounts.

• Trade can be observed to exist by going to a physical store and watching a consumer buy something in exchange for money.

• Companies are complex entities consisting of many moving parts just like the economy, but the existence of companies can be confirmed by visiting one’s offices or factories.

• Consumers can be seen going in and out of stores, restaurants, etc.

• Material goods can be found in many places, including stores and restaurants.

The human “mind” can be viewed similarly to the economy. One could say the human “mind” is a concept consisting of:

• Thoughts

• Beliefs

• Memories

• Opinions

• Perhaps also emotions

However, different people have different opinions on exactly what is and what isn’t part of this “mind”. And in stark contrast to the things that make up the “economy”, the existence of the things that make up this “mind” cannot be confirmed:

• A “thought” is a concept in and of itself that humans appear to use to describe when they hear their own voice in their head. No individual can prove that any other individual experiences “thoughts”, and anyone claiming to know that others experience “thoughts” is claiming to be a mind-reader/psychic. Not to mention, people without an “internal monologue” exist²¹.

• A “belief” is also a concept, that just like “thoughts” cannot be proven to exist. Many people say they have all sorts of beliefs, but no one can prove that their beliefs exist within themselves. People can believe that other people have beliefs if they trust those persons’ words, but that’s it.

• “Memories” are quite likely to exist, given the fact that most people can remember things that happened in the past. However, that is only circumstantial evidence and insufficient to prove memories exist in any one person.

• An “opinion” is also a concept. People may share what they refer to as opinions with one another, but people could be lying. There is no proof that any one individual has any opinions.

• “Emotions”, if included in the concept of a “mind”, is the only one that is a little different due to empathy and the ability to sense the emotions of others. One can also observe things in others (body language, crying, vocal tonality, etc.) from which one can infer that others are likely experiencing emotions. However, none of these are irrefutable proof that any one individual experiences emotions.

Now, psychiatry wants to say that this mind can be ill or sick and require treatment. Just like it’s impossible to be physically ill while every part of one’s body is healthy, it’s not possible to say someone is “mentally ill” without stating that part of that person’s “mind” is sick. Let’s look at what it implies when psychiatrists say someone has a “mental illness”:

• The notion that “thoughts” can be sick or ill is a strange one. Thoughts are thoughts. How can thoughts possibly be sick or ill and be made better via treatment or drugs? One can be of the opinion that another person’s thoughts (when shared verbally) are stupid and maybe refer to them as “sick” or “ill”, but thoughts cannot be “sick” or “ill”.

• The notion that “beliefs” can be sick or ill is an illegal one. Freedom of belief and freedom of religion are widely recognized fundamental human rights.

• The notion that “memories” can be sick or ill sounds like the use of incorrect vocabulary. Can someone suffer from memory loss/amnesia or recollect things incorrectly? Sure, but that would be more aptly referred to as faulty memory, perhaps as a result of a sick brain.

• Stating that someone’s verbally shared “opinions” are sick or ill is expressing your opinion that you don’t like and/or disagree with that person’s opinions. Opinions cannot be sick or ill like parts of a human’s body can be, and the notion that sick “opinions” can be “treated” away is an evil one, most likely coming from people who want to control the world.

• In my personal opinion, the worst of all is stating that “emotions” can be ill or sick. If you punch an individual in the gut, and then when that individual (naturally) gets angry at you state that its emotions are ill or sick, that is incredibly evil. Similarly, if an individual is afraid of elevators, stating that its emotions are ill/sick/wrong is worse than invalidating its emotions, and equal to hatred.

The bottom line here is that the only one who knows what thoughts, beliefs, memories, opinions, and emotions an individual is experiencing, if any, is that individual itself. Outsiders can only guess. Furthermore, as discussed, the desirabilities of different emotional states are objectively subjective, and that also holds true for the desirabilities of different thoughts, beliefs, memories, and opinions.

To state on an individual’s behalf that a certain thought, a certain belief, a certain memory, a certain opinion, or a certain emotion is wrong/sick/ill is incredibly evil, because everyone is allowed to decide these things for themselves.

As such, looked at from this angle, psychiatry is an evil branch of philosophy dealing with the philosophical concept of a “mind” and illnesses of that “mind”. Stating that “mental illnesses” exist is indirectly stating that the thoughts, beliefs, memories, opinions, and emotions of individuals can be ill/sick, which is not only evil but in the case of beliefs even illegal. As such, one could say that psychiatry and the concept of “mental illnesses” are evil and illegal and in violation of fundamental human rights laws.

In summary

If not seen as a religion, psychiatry is a branch of philosophy dealing with the philosophical concept of a human “mind”. However, considering what this “mind” consists of, stating that it can be ill/sick equals to indirectly stating a number of things, which range from evil to illegal.

The World We Live In

As it stands, the few dozen individuals in the US who create the DSM are in charge of determining what does and what doesn’t constitute a “mental illness”/mind disease. (Imagine a few dozen dermatologists being in charge of what is and isn’t a skin disease…). Their decisions are evidently not based on science. What are they based on? Only they know, but looking at some of the things that are being labeled as mind diseases, which include Female Sexual (dis)Interest Disorder, Antidepressant Discontinuation Syndrome, Homosexuality until 1974²², recently Shyness in Children, and even Voyeurism²³, it appears as if this select group of individuals is attempting to police human behaviors and emotions.

If this ended at the creation of the DSM, that would be one thing, but psychiatry is deceiving humanity into believing that psychiatry is a science and that psychiatrists know what are and what aren’t mind diseases. The world believes this is a science, but it’s actually a religion²⁴ because all it is is a system of beliefs.

Worst of all is the fact that with the existence of mental health laws, psychiatry is physically able to police these behaviors. The law is the law, and if an individual’s actions violate the law, punishments and consequences come along with that violation as outlined in the law.

However, on top of the law exists psychiatry. Which through the use of mental health laws is able to involuntarily lock individuals up and perform all sorts of horrifying acts on them, and even straight up change these individuals via mutilation and the drugs of its partner-in-crime, the pharmaceutical industry.

In today’s world, if a psychiatrist doesn’t like your behavior, emotions, or beliefs, it’s not hard for it to make up some reason why you are a danger to yourself or others. A woman isn’t excited by sex? That’s dangerous for the world, because birthrates are declining and it might lead to population collapse. A man stopped taking his antidepressants? He might become depressed again and hurt himself, and as such he’s a danger to himself. A theory does not equate proof. It isn’t legal to lock up and alter human beings based on theories, but yet it is.

The threshold to lock an individual up in an involuntary human alteration facility and perform unspeakable acts on it is incredibly low, especially in Singapore. All it takes is the belief of a police officer that a person could be a danger to itself or others, (which as I am proof of can apparently just be crying in public), and the opinion of a psychiatrist that it should be treated. Individual police officers are neither trained nor qualified to make this inherently subjective judgment, and a psychiatrist can come up with a million reasons why someone should be treated. I challenge you to look through the DSM and declare yourself not “mentally ill” based on psychiatry’s standards. It’s nearly impossible.

Furthermore, psychiatrists don’t even need evidence or a reason to do these things to an individual, not even when medical reports are issued, as evidenced by the medical reports (if you can even call them that) that were issued on me. A single psychiatrist’s opinion is enough to label an individual as “mentally ill”, lock it up, torture it, rape it, mutilate it, and alter it, all against its will.

All of this makes it possible for psychiatry and psychiatrists to police human behaviors that fall well within the law, beliefs that are protected by international human rights laws, and emotions that should never EVER be policed. Psychiatry is an invisible, arbitrary law on top of the real law. This invisible law is written by a few dozen individuals and is called the DSM, and it is policed by the beliefs and opinions of individual psychiatrists. And if behaviors, emotions, and beliefs are what make humans human, psychiatry is policing humans themselves.

In summary

Psychiatry is policing humanity and altering humans who don’t follow its laws as outlined in the DSM. If it were honest and forthcoming about what it is, that would be one thing, but it is deceiving us all by disguising itself as a form of medicine grounded in scientific principles.

Urgent Plea to Singapore Supreme Court

Psychiatry is harming Singapore citizens through primarily IMH, but also private psychiatrists. Here is a summarized list of the reasons why:

• Psychiatry is deceiving Singapore citizens by lying to them that it’s a legitimate science and form of medicine and healthcare.

• Psychiatry is leveraging its reputable public opinion gained through deceit to make Singapore citizens belief their emotional suffering is a result of diseases of some “mind” that cannot be proven to exist.

• Psychiatry is offering its “services” and the drugs of its partner-in-crime, the pharmaceutical industry, as the solution to the emotional suffering of Singapore citizens, in exchange for their money.

• Psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry are rewiring the brains of Singapore citizens, thereby altering them, in spite of not having any jurisdiction over human brains, and in spite of a complete absence of evidence to support that there is anything wrong with the brains of these Singapore citizens.

• Psychiatry, through IMH with the help of the MHCTA, is involuntarily confining Singapore citizens who are suffering emotionally to a facility with others who are suffering emotionally, separating them from their homes and loved ones.

• Psychiatry, through IMH, is restraining Singapore citizens to beds against their wills.

• Psychiatry, through IMH, is (pharmaceutically) raping Singapore citizens via involuntary injections of psychiatric drugs.

• Unless my experiences are an isolated incident, psychiatry, through IMH, is torturing Singapore citizens into obeying the orders of psychiatrists to consume psychiatric drugs.

• Psychiatry, through IMH, is mutilating Singapore citizens via forced injections and coerced consumption of psychiatric drugs.

• Psychiatry, through IMH and private psychiatrists, is harming Singapore citizens.

I urge the Singapore Supreme Court to, at a minimum, urgently order IMH to immediately cease the involuntary confinement and “treatment” of individuals in Singapore, unless there is clear and concise evidence that an individual is likely to end its life in the near future, in order to reduce the amount of harm psychiatry is causing Singapore citizens.

I believe the right thing to do would be to order IMH to cease all operations pending trial, but I believe that such a request would be unlikely to succeed. I suspect that the Singapore Supreme Court would be hesitant to order such measures be taken, in the fear of being wrong. The Singapore Supreme Court is a lot less likely to be blamed/scrutinized for wrong inactions, than it is for wrong actions, which makes it hard to do the right thing, in the fear of being wrong.

In Summary

Psychiatry is harming Singapore citizens. Urgent measures need to be taken to prevent further harm from being done to Singapore citizens.

Long-term solutions to protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry

The following three are solutions that, in my opinion, naturally follow from the truth. I, however, of course acknowledge that I have zero say in Singapore’s policies. I am merely including these in this document, so as to provide alternatives to the status quo.

1) Replace IMH with a Human Preservation Center

I agree that the world is a less bad (or better, depending on one’s perspective) place when there exists a place where individuals that are suffering severely emotionally can go for help. Today, the world sees involuntary human alteration facilities as “mental health hospitals” and the places these individuals can go to, or be brought to, for help. However, as this document has outlined, these facilities, that are based on psychiatric principles, don’t help but harm people.

I propose a human preservation center, that helps individuals who are suffering severely emotionally who are suicidal as follows:

1. On day 1, the individual is allowed to design its own death. It is allowed to state its ideal last 24 hours alive and its preferred method of ending its life. This is recorded.

2. Staff then promises the individual that, if they are unable to help the individual over the following three months, it will be helped to end its life according to point #1.

3. The individual is then shown to its own private room where it can sleep.

4. Over the following three months, the staff works with the individual to improve its life. Fundamentally, suicidality is a result of one’s life being so terrible that death is preferred. Logically, the way to “cure” suicidality is to empower the suicidal individual to make its life less unbearable, and perhaps eventually even turn it into something it desires.

5. To this end, the staff works with the individual to learn how they can help. This can be done via asking questions and listening to the answers. Questions such as: “What do you need?”, “How can we help?”, “What can we do to change your mind about ending your life?”, “What’s the biggest problem in your life?”, etc. The staff then does whatever is in its power to help make a difference.

6. Various other things can be helpful, such as rage rooms allowing individuals to unleash pent-up emotions via destroying (cheap) objects. Such as sedatives and brief medically induced comas for individuals who desire rest and are unable to sleep naturally. And yes, even drugs and even “psychiatric” drugs for individuals who desperately want a temporary form of relief.

The fundamental goal of such a facility should be to help people. Things that’ll logically help people are:

• Respecting the boundaries of individuals.

• Respecting the autonomy of individuals.

• Empowering individuals to be whoever they want to be, even if that ultimately ends up being a deceased person.

Note that this is the exact opposite of how involuntary human alteration facilities operate. Involuntary human alteration facilities put boundaries on people in the form of restraints and confinement. They violate the autonomy of individuals by disregarding the need for consent. And the psychiatrists in charge of those facilities make individuals behave like the psychiatrists want them to.

Putting boundaries on others, violating the boundaries of others, violating the autonomy of others, and turning others into what you want them to be, are all forms of hatred. Respecting the boundaries and autonomy of individuals, and empowering individuals to be whoever they want to be are forms of love. And yes, allowing someone to die and be at peace can be a form of love.

2) Ban psychiatrists (and psychologists) from having offices in hospitals

Neither of these fields belong in a hospital, because neither is a form of medicine/healthcare. Allowing psychiatrists (and psychologists) to have offices in hospitals is deceiving the general public. People should be able to safely assume that anyone who has an office in a hospital is a real, reliable, trustworthy doctor. Being able to prove the existence of that of which one is a doctor needs to be a bare minimum requirement for being a doctor and for being allowed to have an office in a hospital.

3) Psychiatric drugs

Psychiatrists need to be banned from prescribing brain-altering drugs. Partly, because psychiatrists aren’t doctors, and partly because only neurologists should be allowed to prescribe brain-altering drugs.

If psychiatric drugs are allowed to be sold in drugs stores, the labels need to clearly state action and effect. Namely, the action of altering the chemical compositions of all ~500 trillion synapses in one’s brain, thereby rewiring it. And both the positive and negative effects observed in independent studies. Example:

Action: This drug alters the chemical compositions of all ~500 trillion synapses in your brain, thereby rewiring your brain.
Effect: 70% of test subjects report reduced anxiety, 60% report reduced depressive feelings, 25% report weight gain, 15% report reduced sexual libido, 7.5% report suicidal thoughts.

Then, every individual can make its own informed choices on whether to take such drugs or not.

In Summary

Replacing involuntary human alteration facilities with “human preservation centers”, banning psychiatrists (and psychologists) from having offices in hospitals, and changing the laws on psychiatric drugs is a better alternative to the status quo, that would protect Singapore citizens from psychiatry and offer individuals who suffer severely emotionally a more loving environment in which they can heal.

Footnotes (links / sources)

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_First

2. https://www.wired.com/2010/12/ff-dsmv/

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Szasz

4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-022-01661-0

5. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/12/medicine-dsm5-row-does-mental-illness-exist

6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_brain

7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuron

8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/mathematics/synaptic-cleft

9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620336768

10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism

11. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide

12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_psychiatry

13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3339235/

14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_depressive_disorder

15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery

16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust

17. https://unitedgmh.org/newsroom/new-report-reveals-8-million-admitted-to-mental-hospitals-annually/

18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4960429/

19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_psychiatry

20. https://scholarworks.montana.edu/items/641db98c-7874-4b6b-9ed7-12cee0c10c47

21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u69YSh-cFXY

22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM

23. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/paraphilias-and-paraphilic-disorders/voyeuristic-disorder

24. https://www.madintheuk.com/2023/02/leading-psychiatrists-unwittingly-acknowledge-psychiatry-is-a-religion-not-a-science/